New cheap power source heading for independent tests

by Michael Johnson Michael Johnson worked as a reporter and editor in New York, Moscow, Paris and London over his journalism career. He is now based in Bordeaux, France, where he writes for the International Herald-Tribune and other publications. He covered European technology for Business Week for five years, and served nine years as chief editor of International Management magazine. In 1990 he was appointed chief editor of the French technology weekly 01 Informatique where he worked as Editorial Director for two years. He also spent four years as Moscow correspondent of The Associated Press. He is the author of four books and recently edited “24/7 Innovation” for an Accenture consultant and “Nokia: The Inside Story”, written by historian Martti Haikio, for the Nokia Corporation. A fluent French speaker, he also speaks Russian. 30.07.2008
Keywords: Energy Oil CO2 Global Warming

As Middle East oil climbs to record highs, research into alternative energy sources is attracting a wave of new science, much of it still experimental and untested. One of the most advanced concepts, scheduled to go live about a year from now, is being watched with optimism in some scientific quarters and scepticism in others.

Within about 14 months, the technology of BlackLight Power, Inc. is expected to go live on a larger scale, and the debate over its value will soon be closed.

Randell Mills, a medical doctor trained at Harvard University, founder of BlackLight, claims to have developed a working fuel cell based on hydrogen, one of the world's most abundant substances. He sees it as both eco-friendly and highly economical.

Mills seems determined to avoid the fate of the many failed schemes over the centuries - ranging from medieval perpetual motion machines to Cold Fusion -- that have tried to bend the laws of physics to attain a source of free energy.

Sceptics from the scientific community are divided on his prospects for success but he is undaunted. "We are scaling up our first prototype now," a spokesperson for Blacklight Power told me last week. "We will have pilot plants generating electricity in the fall of 2009 and we plan to announce the validators (the first utility companies to test the system) in late August or early September."

Mills says he and his team of scientists now have a fuel cell that can generate a chemical reaction that modifies hydrogen atoms and releases extreme heat. The heat can be used to produce steam and turn electricity-generating turbines - the same mechanical principle used by nuclear power plants.

The company calls its process a "paradigm-shifting new primary energy source" derived from a new field of hydrogen chemistry. A recent press release says the firm is developing "computational chemical design technology based on The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUT-CP), a revolutionary approach to solving atomic and molecular structures".

A journalist who recently visited his laboratory in Cranbury, New Jersey, on the U.S. east coast, witnessed units already generating 50 kilowatts of thermal power. These test units are being built on a larger scale to be installed in several electric power plants for rigorous independent testing

"This is no longer an academic argument," Mills said. "It's proven technology, and we're going to commercialize it as quickly as possible."

BlackLight calculates its technology will be able to produce electricity costing under 2 U.S. cents per kilowatt-hour, compared to a U.S. average of 8.9 cents

Mills developed the reaction - from solid fuel made of hydrogen and catalyzed with sodium hydride -- only a year ago, following 18 years of experimentation on the idea.

The process, the company says, depends on the release of latent energy of the hydrogen atom, a reaction it calls the BlackLight Process. "In this process, the electron in an ordinary hydrogen atom is induced to move closer to the proton, below the prior-known ground state, to form more stable hydrogen atoms called hydrinos. The large energy released exceeds that required to extract hydrogen from water, such that water may serve as the hydrogen fuel source for the process."

Mills has complained that establishment scientists have attempted to discredit him in polemical postings on the internet, but in response he has adopted a transparent information policy, even making his patented procedure public on his company's website, www.blacklightpower.com".

He predicts that his company will grow from a group of 11 scientists to a payroll of 500 to 1,000 employees within about two years and that his technology could satisfy a majority of the world's power needs. "The demand is going to be huge," he has said.

BlackLight has been careful not to inflate its claims prematurely, and no effort has been made to woo the media. But now it seems ready to start talking. It has engaged Hill & Knowlton, a leading public relations firm in New York, to handle an expected rise in press interest.

The company has about $60 million in development funds and a board of directors of heavyweight investors and energy executives. The board includes Michael Jordan, former CEO of both Electronic Data Systems and Westinghouse; Neil Moskowitz, CFO of Credit Suisse First Boston; and Shelby Brewer, former CEO of ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power.

Established scientists believe Mills' thinking violates quantum mechanics, a body of knowledge accepted by most of the scientific community as a fundamental set of principles.

Andreas Rathke of the European Space Agency, among many others has published criticism of Mills' technology. But Jan Naudts, a physicist at the University of Antwerp, acknowledges that some investigators immediately found errors in Mills' process but he adds, "That's quite common with new theories. And his hasn't been investigated on a large scale."


From the Editor:

Click here for a diagram of the Black Light Power process.

If you wish to comment on this article, you can do so on-line.

Should you wish to publish your own article on the Facts & Arts website, please contact us at . Please note that Facts & Arts shares its advertising revenue with those who have contributed material and have signed an agreement with us.

Watch below Randell Mills giving a speech o June 4, 2008 about BLP invention:

Rate this article

Click the stars to rate

Share with:

| More

Comments (15)

consulting metallurgical engineer

by hydrogen man
Blacklight Power appears to capture the unlimited source of power; e.g. the use
of hydrogen to produce useable electrical power. I have stated for years that
fossile fuels will be history by year 2050. Blacklight Power is a step in that
direction. I have supported the mass production of hydrogen by nuclear reactors.
However, this technique requires a relilable means to handle massive amoun ts of
high level nuclear waste - Blacklight Power sidesteps this requirement.

Much success!

Alex Holland
Report offensive post

Venture Capitalist

by Tom Swartsbally
Hmmm, sound like BS to me. Where is a small working model? Just come up with a 1kw generator and power a 1kw fan in front of Google's headquarter for a month 24/7 then you will get some credibility. Bet you can't.
Report offensive post

me

by me
hydrinos ??? new qantum tate ??? noy before i will saw it working. nd even if it is working i guess there is something different under it.
Report offensive post

Dr

by Chas
We already have working fuel cells and masses of research thanks initially to the 'space race' under our belts. This 'blacklight' is I presume some EMR that is just not in the visible spectrum... again nothing new or 'paradigm shifting..." No I agree with Venture capitalist on this version of a 'Nigerian scam'... If it is that good just go ahead and do it rather than spread a load of unsubstantiated hype which takes advantage of peoples ignorance and fear when it comes to oil based power provision.
Report offensive post

Dr

by chemist
Modifies hydrogen atoms???... what??... talks of 'a new inert form of hydrogen!!...do they mean tritium or deuterium? ... These guys really do need a basic chemistry lesson.... Then a mention of solid hydrogen??... reacting with sodium hydride.... ?... Their website says:
"The lower-energy atomic hydrogen products can be used to form novel hydrino hydride compounds (HHCs), and constitute a vast class of new chemistry with broad commercial applications.".... shouldn't that be CHH recognisable instantly as 'carbohydrens'...???... Well I have news for them there already is a vast class of compounds there with commercial application called the 'petrochemical industry'. The diagram 'explaining' the new energy source on their site is totally unreadable and obviously garbage. Is it an April 1st joke??
Report offensive post

Ian

by Jackson
Im a high school kid and we talked about this site in our science lesson. Not one kid in my class was fooled.
totally awesome joke tho guys
How does the scam work? is it the book sales or sofware that obviously uses some other kind of science to what we have here on earth or maybe it works using faith.
Report offensive post

Black light hope

by Robin Hood
The first reasonable thing ,was to post in the webb the recipe of this new energie devise ., in order to protect themself against big brother
The second should be to make an experimental model , working in a public view to prouve the veracity of the claim with scientific withnesses .
The change of energie will also be the change of weathy tycons, ready to do anything to keep their antisocial monopoly .
Is time for an oil change and tycons to !!
Report offensive post

BSEE

by hgdorsey
Scientist that deny Randol Millls Blacklight process are not using the scientific process!
Science is an ever changing theroetical process where models are proposed and then verified by experiment. THE EXPERIMENT IS THE FINAL JUDGE OF OF THE CORRECTNESS
OF A THEORY. Obvoiusly, The Mills process has been experimentally verified. So it follows that the present theories need to be corrected. End of debate!
Report offensive post

What rubbish BSEE

by GHA
Present Scientific theories need correcting?... You mean in physics the 'law of conservation of energy'... and in chemistry the law of conservation of mass??... suddenly these scientific 'theories' by which every practical energy transformation and interchange is today and for the past hundred years, has been calculated with perfect accuracy are suddenly totally wrong??... Suddenly unprecedented energy exists where none existed before??... If the Mills process did suddenly produce masses of energy it would have to come from somewhere!!... the process discribed is not nuclear so it must be chemical, unless metaphysics comes in somehow and God is making it from nothing... Get real BSEE, do the maths and simply calculate the energy output of say two hydrogen atoms forming a water molecule with an oxygen atom and it is soon obvious that you'd need to produce a massive amount of water to provide anything near base load electricity. End of debate!
Report offensive post

How it works

by FireAnt
You have to read in some depth to understand what it is he is claiming. Firstly he says all physics, the macro and micro world can be understood purely by the laws of classical physics. He works up a classical model of the electron and explains classicly why it does and doesn't radiate both as a free particle and when bound to the H-atom. When it is stable such as in the ground state it cannot radiate energy and move closer to the proton but according to his theory you can remove energy using non-radiative but common processes (ie such as resonant energy processes) in which energy is transferred without photon emission between the H atom and an atom or ion with ionisation energies capable of absorbing interger multiples of 27.2ev. Not exactly sure why the potential energy of hydrogen or multiples thereof is the key! When the ground state loses this energy it destabilises the classical forces balancing the H atom and it shrinks further into a below ground radius with the emission of photons in the UV range until it again reaches a stable sub-ground or hydrino state. Hence the name Blacklight Power. There are claimed multiple below ground states: H1/2 is one half the radius of the H ground state, H1/3 is a third of the ground state radius etc up to a maximum of 1/137. The claimed viability as an almost limitless energy source is that atomic H can be extracted from water for a fraction of the energy produced when hydrogen collapses into these sub-ground states. For example you need 2.5ev to split H2 and O and a further 4.5ev to split H2 into two separate hydrogen atoms. If it were possible to collapse both of those H atoms to an H(1/5), his theory claims you get a total energy release of 326ev each H atom, ie it cost you 7ev to generate 652ev of energy. Does it work? Whether you like the theory or not and the insinuation that we somehow got it all horribly wrong, you can read his reports on experimental results, the NMR scans of the claimed created hydrino compounds and the alleged energy produced in his cells and make up your own mind. Or wait to see if he can retrofit an existing powerplant with his claimed new solid fuel reaction (involving NaH???) by the end of 2009. His business plan envisages a license where Blacklight is paid per reactor on a percentage of the reduced fuel costs. It means we might have to sell our shares in coal mining companies tho :)
Report offensive post

hydrino ?

by attoparsec
why nobody detected the hydrino state of H before ?
the process is producing lots of hydrino. what we gonna do with it ?
GUT-CP ? LOL.
Report offensive post

Rename

by Ian Johnson
You should rename this site Craps and Farts ... then the rubbish posted on it would be put into a proper context!!
Report offensive post

Where do you get the Hydrogen?

by Cpt Jim
OK, so let's skip all the alleged science for the moment ... we know there are other types of Hydrogen cells being developed for the Auto industry. The biggest problem (assuming the science works out) is the supply of Hydrogen. It doesn't matter how efficient the final fuel cell is -- you have to add in the cost of the supplies as well. Where do you get the Hydrogen? From water? How much power will that take to separate the Hydrogen and Oxygen? And at what cost? Even if the technology works, there are no sources of hydrogen by itself.
Report offensive post

Just wait.

by TWamm
Mills has been working on his new science for over 20 years, full time, with hired help, plus outside collaborators. It's not trivial and it cannot be effectively summarized for quick understanding. At minimum you need 10 hours to scratch the surface. No one will catch up with Mills' understanding of the new physics until long after he is dead. Whether his work is truthful or not, outsiders' best course of action is to just stay out of the way, and wait for results. Mills might be onto something good for all of us, so don't slow him down by getting in his way or making derogatory noises based on zero understanding.
Report offensive post

Re:

by Marcella34BRYAN
I took 1 st loan when I was 32 and that helped my relatives a lot. Nevertheless, I need the auto loan once more time.
Report offensive post

Comment this article

Fill in all fields