Odd couple share Cliburn gold

by Michael Johnson Michael Johnson worked as a reporter and editor in New York, Moscow, Paris and London over his journalism career. He is now based in Bordeaux, France, where he writes for the International Herald-Tribune and other publications. He covered European technology for Business Week for five years, and served nine years as chief editor of International Management magazine. In 1990 he was appointed chief editor of the French technology weekly 01 Informatique where he worked as Editorial Director for two years. He also spent four years as Moscow correspondent of The Associated Press. He is the author of four books and recently edited “24/7 Innovation” for an Accenture consultant and “Nokia: The Inside Story”, written by historian Martti Haikio, for the Nokia Corporation. A fluent French speaker, he also speaks Russian. 10.06.2009
Keywords: Cliburn Piano Competition

The Van Cliburn International Piano Competition in Fort Worth, Texas, ended Sunday on a somewhat sour note, with some critics and former winners wondering how the jury could award the top prize jointly to the two young winners - one a Chinese teenager, the other a blind, autistic Japanese boy who memorizes music from CDs.

South Korean Yeol Eum Son, 23, won the silver medal. No "crystal" award, or third prize, was given. This was the first time the Cliburn has awarded the top three prizes to Asians.

Italian finalist Mariangela Vacatello, 27, won the first audience award, determined by webcast viewers. As a tribute to her outstanding performance, she was besieged on her way out of the hall by fans and autograph-seekers. Some critics felt she had been undervalued by the jury.

Jury discretionary awards went to Lukas Vondracek, 22, of the Czech Republic, Alessandro Deljavan, 22, of Italy, and Eduard Kunz, 28, of Russia. Deljavan was also touted early on as a possible gold medal winner.

Haochen Zhang, the Chinese gold winner, who turned 19 during the competition, was noticed throughout the two-week eliminations as a player with strong technique but sometimes superficial grasp of the music. This is a common complaint about Asians now flooding U.S. and European conservatories and competitions.

The Japanese pianist sharing the gold was Nobuyuki Tsujii, 20, blind from birth and mentally handicapped, who offered undistinguished performances but was the object of sympathy from jurors, the public and some of the press. One blogger called him the "Susan Boyle of the piano", referring to the British amateur singer who recently created a stir on a television talent show with her combination of a clear voice but limited social skills.

One critic said in his internet blog: "The trouble (with Tsujii) popped up in … Beethoven's Hammerklavier Sonata. It sounded entirely too much like everything else he's played. There's too little variability in his frequently shallow tone … The structure was all over the place, too. Simply, he doesn't understand the music."

The critic wrote that if Tsujii made the finals, which he did, the jury "will be ignoring his performances and voting for the blind guy. And this undeveloped but talented musician deserves more consideration than that."

Said another critic: "He's not quite there yet. He went right past the music in the famous (Chopin) third etude, because he couldn't wait to get to the thirds. His Debussy sounded exactly like the Chopin, too,"

"Nobu", as he became known to his fans, said virtually nothing during the competition, allowing his mother, father and translator to do the talking. From my Bordeaux study, I watched a webcast of one of his rehearsals for a Chopin Piano Concerto. His keyboard touch was uncertain but the conductor seemed to be giving him the benefit of the doubt. As his translator relayed the conductor's suggestions to him, his head rolled about on his shoulders and he said nothing.

The only comment from him relayed by the media in Fort Worth concerned his admiration for another blind pianist. "I listen to jazz a lot," he said through his translator, "and I like Stevie Wonder. Meeting him was the happiest moment of my life."

Other than that comment, it emerged in an interview with his father that Nobu likes cowboys and he likes Texas. "Many people in Texas were very kind. And Texas is very wide," his father said.

Others at the competition noticed that Nobu was surrounded by an entourage of assistants who protected him from contact with others. Too much socializing was said to risk interfering with his musical skills.

One leading pianist compared Tsujii to sufferers of the "idiot savant" syndrome as described by neurologist Oliver Sacks in his recent book "Musicophilia". Sacks recalls the case of American black pianist "Blind Tom", who in the 1860s displayed "prodigious musical powers" but little else and became a national curiosity. Many other odd musical prodigies have since been identified.

The syndrome, wrote Dr. Sacks, allows "prodigious development (of music skills) in a mind that may otherwise be underdeveloped in verbal and abstract thought."

Conductor James Conlon, who led the Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra through the finalists' concertos, said Tsujii was his first encounter with a blind pianist. "I don't think he should be viewed as some sort of circus act," Conlon said. "Obviously he's an extraordinarily musical person, an extraordinary pianist. And I think he will do very well on the absolute objective scale of his talent."

The competition's integrity was further undermined by what some critics saw as a bias against Russian applicants, and jury members openly voting for their own students.

Others complained that a disproportionate number of students from the Juilliard School of Music in New York made it into the semifinals. Mme. Yoheved "Veda" Kaplinsky, head of piano at Juilliard, was on the pre-selection committee that identified the 29 competitors, then also on the jury. Most competitions, including the London International Piano Competition, prohibit such conflicts of interest.

Of the 12 Cliburn semifinalists, six were Asian, and of the six finalists, four were Asian.

Complained one critic: "What does that say about the judges' preferences? Or more broadly, what does it say about where classical music is headed in the next decade?"

International piano competitions, ever more numerous in Europe and the United States, have become somewhat tainted by the closed community of jurors and participants, many of whom are part of a circle that moves from venue to venue. Integrity will suffer further if criteria other than the quality of performance are allowed to weigh on the results.


Below video clips of performances by the top four. Your views on the competition, or music competitions in general, would be much appreciated. Please write your comments below.


Haochen Zhang, Gold Medalist, Final Recital:


Nobuyuki Tsujii, Gold medalist, Semifinal Recital:


Yeol Eum Son, Silver Medalist, Semifinal Recital:


Mariangela Vacatello, First Audience Award, Final Recital:



Your views on the competition would be much appreciated. Please write your comments below.

Should you wish to publish your own article on the Facts & Arts website, please contact us at

Editor


Rate this article

Click the stars to rate

Share with:

| More

Comments (32)

Nobu Tsujii

by Beethoven connoisseur
Nobu Tsujii is the best Beethoven and best Chopiin player at this competition. His best performances: Chopin E minor piano concerto, Beethoven Appassionata sonata. I also like his Hammerklavier to some degree, and of course, I admire his Chopin Etudes Op. 10. He is OK with Rachmaninoff and Liszt.

I suspect that being the best Beethoven and Chopin player can gain disproportionally more points from the jury than being 2nd bests.

Haochen Zhang is the all-around guy who plays everything at a very high level. I consider him to be the 2nd best Chopin player at this competition, after Tsujii. He is probably the best all-around pianist at the competition.
Report offensive post

Nobu

by PianoGirl
I think it was about his disability more than his playing. Son had much more personality in her playing than the two winners. She was near perfect on top of it. The 19 year old was tehcnically good, but clueless. I'm disappointed in the competition this time. They need to reevaluate their purpose.
Report offensive post

Son

by PianoGirl
They also programmed Son disadvantageously. She had to play three days in a row. Others only had to play every two days. She excelled despite the handicap. Her achievement was much greater for that reason alone, but she played better on top of it.
Report offensive post

by Theowne
Um....Tsujii isn't "mentally handicapped".
Report offensive post

Music critic?

by Zeus
I wonder what it takes to become a piano competition critic? A technology reporter? Does a technology reporter "understand" music more than a pianist?

Sounds like pretty much an article full of sour grapes.

By the way, deaf is not the same as mentally handicapped.
Report offensive post

by prasanth11
Uh...try doing some basic research next time before writing your articles. Mr. Journalist. Tsujii isn't "mentally handicapped", he's blind and that's it. Shyness, deferential behavior, or physical habits due to blindness does not make someone "autistic" or an "idiot savant". I have no idea where you got this from since no newspaper makes this false claim, so I assume you heard someone tell this to you, and so included it in your report without bothering to do any research first. Hooray for journalism!
Report offensive post

Journalism?

by Matthew S
If there was an equivalence for the Van Cliburn of journalism, I assure you, this article would not have made it past the auditions. Clearly a simple case of sour grapes, and poorly researched information with no supportive evidence to justify the assertion. Nobu is blind. It does not mean he's a savant, it does not mean he's mentally disabled, it does mean that he has a mental disorder, it means he cannot see - that's IT.

The fact that you cannot appreciate the result, or the (albeit coincidental) number of Asian pianists who qualified in the finals, displays another reason why you are nothing more than an arm-chair juror who is also a journalist. I have no doubts about the former, but the latter I am beginning to question.
Report offensive post

Nobu

by Mayumi
I was utterly surprised that you actually post this article without any evidence and further information about Nobuyuki Tsuji. He is blind but he is not mentally disabled, not "autistic" or "idiot savant." Your description of Tsujii simply shows how much you were disgusted by the results and you are attacking Tsujii's physical appearance.

I am Japanese, and I do NOT think that Nobu should have proceeded to the final(or even semi-final,) but I have great respect for his efforts on piano. Nobu speaks fine (in Japanese), answers fine in interviews, just like sighted people do.
He composes music, too, for your reference.
Report offensive post

Asian pianists

by Beethoven connoisseur
Asian pianists are excellent pianists in general, because they all trained at the world's best conservatoires. Just take a visit to Juilliard, Curtis, Manhattan School of Music, Mannes School of Music, Moscow Tchaikovsky, Paris Conservatoire, Hanover Music School in Germany, USC, Indiana, Cleveland Institute, New England Conservatory, Yale School of Music ... etc ... and you can see a large percentage of students are Asians. These schools are competing with each other for talented students, just so you know.

And then look at the history of the world's top competitions: Cliburn, Tchaihovsky, Chopin, Queen Elisabeth, Leeds, Liszt ... Asian winners and laureates are the rule, not the exception. By the way, they all have different juries, so there is some independence there too.

Yo-Yo Ma is considered the best cellist for the last 20 yrs. Midori and Sarah Chang are considered among the very best violinists in the world for at least the last 15 yrs. Don't forget violinists Akiko Suwanai and Jennifer Koh who are also world-class in their own right.

This has been going on since the 1980s.
Report offensive post

by Ignaz Krasovsky
Dear Mr. Asian pianist . Problem is the people you mentioned above are not competition winners - Midori or Yo Yo Ma . They are really amazing but problem( is in comparison with the past juries in 30's 40's years of XX century) people who are sitting in jury are just normal craftsmans , not artist. Just to mention in the past history of Chopin Competition people like Maurice Ravel , M.Long ,Arthur Rubinstein and so on were sitting in jury. The awarded people had really some great personalities. Now the are a lot of competitions , lot of great craftsmans and lack of personalities and people who win competition have no job because people from concert halls are completely not interested in next Mr. Li or Park
Best regards
Ignaz
Report offensive post

blind, deaf or autistic

by Lyn
These are all quite different...the reporting seems rather biased!
Report offensive post

Professor of Piano and Artist-in- University of Cincinnati, College Conservatory of Music

by Eugene Pridonoff
This is one of the best articles I have read concerning the problems with competitions. I did not hear this competition in any manner and do not wish to comment on the quality of performances. But the references of teachers voting for their own students and the closed circuit of judges and performances will ultimately cannibalize the integrity of these competitions. As it is, we can barely remember who has won these competitions after a few years, and true artistry has little to do with the results of these events. Judging should be anonymous at all stages and the playing judged on an absolute sense without knowledge of age, teachers, and previous competitions experience. During the competition, the judges should be separated from each other by curtains so that any conversation, body language, and all possible forms of subtle persuasion are eliminated. Voting on a point schedule should be immediate as in the Olympics and displayed on a screen within a short interval following the performance and publicly displayed on a large computerized screen so that everyone can see each vote of each judge. This will not necessarily assure a foolproof system, but it can minimize improper and inappropriate influences that are plaguing many of the worlds' music competitions.
Report offensive post

Contents

by Marina Panfilova
Really the best article it is! I am so glad that Mr. Michael Johbson wrote so openly and honestly about the things many of musicians are afraid to declare. But the price we pay for the silence is too high: going this way we might find 'the language of soul' (as classical music distined to be) turned into some kind of sophisticated tricks.

Trying to meet the eyes of some mumbers of the jury of the competitions in Italy (Val Tidone, Barletta), in Germany (Ettlingen) I hoped to find there a glimpse of dissatisfaction with their work - but I failed; they simply hid thier eyes, So respectable musicians, experiensed, highly educated - why did not they look at me openly, bravely. Wasn't is because they saw in me the very audience they were deceiving by giving them mediocrity instead of real art, this very audience that need not sophisticated pattern on the surface, but contents unnder the perfectness of the form.

Dear Mr. Johnson, the problem. as I see it, is very difficult, because we have no 'convincing proofs' and many 'profassionals' will hurry to declare that we have no right to judge. But do we have 'convinsing proofs that there is reason in our life? And aren/t we going to lose any hope of its existance if we afford losing sense in such divine sphere as Music is?
Report offensive post

Ignorant

by joe
Your article is full of ignorance. In 100% of international music competitions, the judges are required to abstain from voting for their own students. Asian musicians are taking over the western classical music scene. Thank God they are. Asians in China, Japan and Korea appreciate good music and their governments and public are going all out to promote it. Look at our own educational system here. Funding cuts in school music classes. Funding cuts in just about all cultural organizations. The commercial promotion of pop music has just about degraded our good music culture entirely. As far as those sour grapes who say Asian musicians are only good technically, just take a good look at all the major orchestras in the world and talk to the music directors and they can tell you why they hire so many Asian musicians. Because they are good, that's why. As far as that Chinese teenager who won the gold medal in this year's Van Cliburn Competition, I can tell you that he is darn good both technically and musically and he deserved the gold medal hands down. Ask any professional pianist who listened to him in person and on the web, he or she will tell you the same.
Report offensive post

Zhang

by Shirley S.
When I attended the Cliburn this year, I heard none of the finalists, unfortunately. But heard almost all performances of the finalists on radio. Sight unseen, Zhang was in a class by himself throughout the competition....obviously a remarkable prodigy. (I' studied piano from age 6, through two college degrees and master classes in New York.)
Report offensive post

A partially silly result

by Tim G
I listened to a great deal of the competition via its webcasts. I was surprised that certain players in the early rounds did not make the finals, as well as surprised at the choice of others who did. I listened to all of the finalists performances and I have to say that from the first, to my ear anyway, Haochen Zhang stood out as the clear winner by his flawless execution but also for the musicality of his readings - particularly in the Mozart K. 466. Sad to say, I really cannot understand how a jury of professional musicians could have considered Nobuyuki Tsujii the equal of Mr. Zhang in any way. His blindness prevents any real ensemble playing and he had nothing much to say in solo repertoire either. In my opinion he shouldn't have been accepted to the competition in the first place. Being awarded a co-First Prize simply devalues the prize and the competition and is, I think, terribly unjust to Mr. Zhang who, if merit were the only consideration, should have won First Prize on his own.
Report offensive post

Music lover

by George Bournoutian
This was not a good competition. The winners were blah. Vacatello deserved better. Why should they have 3 Israeli-Americans on a jury of 10? Are there no other American pianists? The Clibrun, unlike the Chopin, Leeds, or Queen Elizabeth has mediocre jurors--few are major pianists. If they vote for their own students--shame--As to the Asians taking over--no one complained when Jewish or Russian pianists played everywhere. The problem was not the Asian winners, but winners who played without conviction, color, or tone.
Report offensive post

nonsense

by Tim Harris
I am one of Tsuji's teachers at Ueno Gakuen in Japan, and I was appalled by your irresponsible description of him. He is a highly intelligent young man. I think you need to make a public retraction and apology.
Report offensive post

Lets at least get the facts straight...

by Clovis Borney
Cliburn Competition jurors are not allowed to vote for their present or past students. Period. This information can be easily found and to my knowledge has *never* been challenged with any valid facts. Yet here, you present this as being an actual fact - just as you appear to have chosen some of the worst critics' comments around to try to validate some vague sense of injustice, ignoring the others that didn't feel that way. What was leveled at Tsujii's Hammerklavier sonata could easily be leveled at Zhang's bland rendition of Brahm's Handel Variations, where very few of the composer's intentions as written on the score came through in the performance, let alone any sense of structure. There were critics, including the Dallas paper, that raved about Bolzhanov's Chopin concerto - a performance which was nothing short of a disaster by any standards. It should be clear by now that the level of music criticism in the USA (and also in the rest of the world) has fallen considerably from what it used to be - as the critics are, in general, much more biased and less knowledgeable than professional musicians - and normally do not catch totally objective facts such as fistfuls of wrong notes, wrong rhythm, bad stylistic choices and overpedaling. There are always several sides to the subjective evaluation "divide" in the arts - you make it appear as though most serious critics and musicians didn't agree with these results. I was there, know most of them, and that is simply not the case. Almost every professional musician I know thought Tsujii's rendition of Chopin's first concerto to be one of the greatest performances in the competition, for its subtle beauty, poetry and depth. It depends on who *you* choose to quote. And choosing to do so apparently only to enhance your story's message is, to me, very irresponsible journalism indeed.
Report offensive post

Fantastically Misguided... and Offensive

by Grazzidad
I cannot believe I'm reading something in the 21st century that says "Of the 12 Cliburn semifinalists, six were Asian, and of the six finalists, four were Asian. Complained one critic: "What does that say about the judges' preferences? Or more broadly, what does it say about where classical music is headed in the next decade?""

You know, all those Asians also had dark eyes! What does THAT say about "the judges' preferences"? Answer: nothing. It's their JOB to judge the pianists as humans, based on their talent. It's utterly racist to lump a Korean-American woman, a Japanese man trained in Japan and a naturalized Chinese man into one group based on their region of ethnic origin.

The remarks about Nobu are similarly ridiculous: he is not mentally handicapped. He is blind and socially-backward. That is all. Some of his playing was top drawer, like the Hammerklavier. Haochen Zhang gave an utterly stupendous rendition of Petrouchka, one to rival even Pollini.

And there was one genius in the competition who wasn't mentioned at all: Evgeny Bozhanov. He 'broke' under the pressure of the finals, but his early round performances were miraculous, and BY FAR the best playing by anyone in the competition. He was also leading on all internet polls until he splattered wrong notes in the Chopin Em concerto.

Two other pianists deserve mention: Andrea Lam, whose Schumann is in the Cortot / Fischer league, and Zhang Zuo, a highly imaginative and technically volatile pianist who whaled the tar out of the Liszt sonata.

Or at least those are my perceptions.
Report offensive post

Comments in Particular

by Milpen
Grazzidad said: "I cannot believe I'm reading something in the 21st century that says "Of the 12 Cliburn semifinalists, six were Asian, and of the six finalists, four were Asian. Complained one critic: "What does that say about the judges' preferences? Or more broadly, what does it say about where classical music is headed in the next decade?""

For one thing, the writer of the last quote should be HAPPY that CM has someplace as fertile to 'head' as the musicians of Asia have proved, and are proving.

Everyone who watched the VCC felt horrible about the breakdown of Boshanov in his Concerto performances, which revealed passages of some peculiar musical fetishes in addition to an unexpected panoply of wrong notes.



Report offensive post

Petition against teachers and schools, foundations and non-profit organizations (competitions)

by Value of originality and loneliness/ piano is a companion

Piano methods have become "political" (ie. "party-mentality" as ). Devotion to "party" (teachers, schools) - is a quality of winners and composers' "heir"- teachers.

The Industry of "aggressive perfectionism" is a machine with no way out of the system. Aggression, as an antipode of fear, is a tool of judgment, punishment and guilt, to imprison every note in the right "audio-forms" (like filling food in a hungry stomach). Composers become an intellectual fetish as their funeral masks smile back at each urtext for inheritors.

And in a world where people, places, cultures and music are getting more and more homogenized, uniqueness is to be protected, encouraged, and even exalted.

...but money didn't really go to performers, they go to other businesses for organizers. Organizers from competitions are getting sponsors because people who donate them money can get a tax deduction.

So in that case the government needs to resolve the situation and allow a tax deduction for individual sponsoring of artists whom the country will be proud to represent all around the world, allow to put money in the concert tours with good orchestras, solo recitals, or appearance at the festivals.

So my point is that the finances should be switched from businesses toward the artists...atleast there needs to be an established law so this can happen.
Report offensive post

About subjectivity and objectivity

by pianists as individual artists
It has to be brought to world attention as to the governments that should be allowed to support pianists as individual artists without the establishment of foundations. For now, only foundations can sponsor individual artists. There is difficult competition with career grants. On the other hand, so many wealthy philanthropists would love to get involved in the management of their favorite artist's career. They would love to have a subjective relationship. And they don't need to weigh objective conditions which are on scales, always under pressure (for example, who is more talented? a person who plays all the right notes or a person who as a human being just talks to the public from his heart, and actually the public wouldn't care about his wrong notes or his fantastic spontaneous improvisations). From hand to hand as it was, for example, with von Meck and Tchaikovsky, and not too many examples we even know...they're private
Report offensive post

Ratings for good or bad competitions (judges and winners)/contestants' network of complaints

by
Ratings for good or bad competitions (judges and winners)/contestants' network of complaints
Somehow somebody has to take care of all complaints in the competitions and mark competitions with bad reputations. There should be published scales of competitions' reputations every year. Like they publish Alink and World Federation booklets...booklets should have marks from 1-10 about honesty, or it could be a separate booklet, and also the same scale can apply to famous judges of competitions. So, I mean, that it could be a collection agency of complaints - it could be an organization. Somebody should take responsibility for it. Sometimes you see that judges aren't allowed to have students and even they try to follow it, but, for example, ... the organization would cover it up with lies which is a lie under the rule tha t"no judges have any students in the competition". And they lie because they have to represent to sponsors their best. The network of judges is not only scales and not only students in the competitions but it's even gamblers' winks at the casino cardtable.
This agency should collect all suspicious facts. Even follow which contestants and which judges were together in competitions and how many times. And if the same couple appear with first prize it should be recorded. Especially if the same contestant plays the same pieces, and especially concertos in the last round. Actually it's all really easy to find out. Another thing is a moral issue: sexual affairs which are very stylish for some judges and contestants. It would be okay and private if they wouldn't get prizes for it as it was an art.
Report offensive post

"Who do you prefer not to see on juries ...?"

by A new questionaire

A new questionaire has been launched on the internet which probes into the delicate matter of relations between jury members and contestants.

One of the questions is quite daring: "Who do you prefer not to see on juries ...?"

This leads immediately to another question which, however, is to be answered by the initiators of this questionaire: What to do with the answers ... ?

Those who are interested to see the questionaire can find it here: www.surveygizmo.com
/s/118892/transparency-in-
music-competitions-who-do-
we-not-want-to-see-on-juries

who are interested to see the questionaire can find it here: www.surveygizmo.com
/s/118892/transparency-in-
music-competitions-who-do-
we-not-want-to-see-on-juries
Report offensive post

the results of music competitions can be quite surprising

by It is well-known among all musicians
It is well-known among all musicians that the results of music competitions can be quite surprising. Even jury members and the organisers themselves sometimes do not understand the outcomes ...

For the audience and the contestants, it is easy to talk about the results, but organisers and jury members must be careful to express their opinions, especially during the competition. That's understandable.

Therefore, it was highly remarkable that at the recent Geza Anda Competition in Zurich, Mrs. Hortense Anda-Buehrle came on stage at the conclusion of the first round, and made a special statement. Before the results of the first round were handed out to the contestants, she wanted to make clear that she (and the Board of the Geza Anda Foundation) did not agree with the decisions by the jury !

She added that the Concours Geza Anda was created to award pianists who perform in the style of her late husband, but not to encourage loud and quick piano playing.

Obviously, she was very disappointed with the decisions by the jury, but it is the task of the jury to make these decisions and she therefore had to respect them.

Although some people thought that Mrs. Anda should not have made such statement, Gustav would like to praise her for being so honest and for speaking out in public about her opinion about her preferred style of piano performance (a feeling which probably many other true musicians share).
Report offensive post

"market place" behaviour of renowned pedagouges in the jurys of music competitionsof most competitions

by protest against the "under the table" voting systems of most competitions
I greatly approve of this initiative. Since competing has- maybe unfortunately- become an inevidable aspect of the professional music world it is deffinately time to publicly protest against the "under the table" voting systems of most competitions, and I even dare say "market place" behaviour of renowned pedagouges in the jurys of music competitions.

Report offensive post

/transparency-in-international-music-competitions.html

by Published by Olga Monakh on Nov 06, 2008
http://gopetition.com/petitions/transparency-in-international-music-competitions.html
Report offensive post

Capitalism Kills Classical Music

by somebody’s got to give more
Classical music like everything else in today's hyper-capitalist world is thoroughly controlled by the business class


".With the Government giving less to art and education,somebody’s got to give more. And that somebody is Asian-American’s corporations." [1] http://www.newleftreview.org/?page=article&view=1957#_edn1

Chin-tao Wu in New Left Review 230
Embracing the Enterprise Culture: Art Institution since the 1980s
Review of "Who Killed Classical Music" by Norman Lebrecht.
Report offensive post

the star system in classical music,

by A new questionaire
You are right about the malignant effects of the star system in classical music, but how is it any different than what has happened in sports and the rest of the entertainment world? A few performers but a Jury/ Mme. Yoheved "Veda" Kaplinsky/ of competitions are able to leverage a king's ransom in wages from the capitalists, as the rest sink into poverty (pianist who have no choice). The apologists wring their hands, but the system appears helpless to stop the trend.
Report offensive post

The Mean-spiritedness

by Fan Z
The mean-spiritedness of the author is blatant. I came to this site becasue I was puzzled by what this Michael Johnson was trying to say in the August 7th New York Times opinion piece (The Dark Side of Piano Competitions). He seems to be implying in that article that "Asians is a disease that infected piano competitions" and "Asians won the competitions by bribing the juries" and "Asians will never understand our European music", but the language is a lot less direct there. After all, that is the New York Times that requires higher brain-washing skills. I must say he is much more honest here. I really like his tactics of using the Texas quote to discredit the Japanese player's intelligence. Not very subtle, but honest.
Report offensive post

just FYI

by a stranger
Nobu's father was in Japan during the competition. This kind of simple mistake show what kind of journalist the writer is.
Report offensive post

Comment this article

Fill in all fields