Science requires discussion
by Samantha Harpole
Isn't it interesting that there seem to be two viewpoints in the responses to this article. The first says the debate is over, and the second gives information and facts. Even though I have a college degree, my basic understanding of science theory goes back to my high school science teacher. No science is ever totally settled. No matter what the consensus is, real science allows disenter opinons and research that is contrary to generally held beliefs. If someone demands that scientific discussion be shut down, then they are demanding that science be shut down. Only to be replaced with some sort of religion where basic scientific principles are considered to be sins. I only have room in my life for one religion. The cult of Al Gore is pure insanity, no to mention an affront to science.
Are you sure you want to report this comment as offensive?
by Samantha Harpole
Isn't it interesting that there seem to be two viewpoints in the responses to this article. The first says the debate is over, and the second gives information and facts. Even though I have a college degree, my basic understanding of science theory goes back to my high school science teacher. No science is ever totally settled. No matter what the consensus is, real science allows disenter opinons and research that is contrary to generally held beliefs. If someone demands that scientific discussion be shut down, then they are demanding that science be shut down. Only to be replaced with some sort of religion where basic scientific principles are considered to be sins. I only have room in my life for one religion. The cult of Al Gore is pure insanity, no to mention an affront to science.
Are you sure you want to report this comment as offensive?
