by nahert

North Korea's economy is in dire straits, while it's people die of hunger and lack of basic amenities, it's government is still bent on apportioning much of the country's wealth on it's nuclear weapons programme. What would North Korea have to protect when it's most precious resource, the people, are all dead? On America and it's much hated foreign policy, we have to look back in history where the world much needed America's wealth immediately after World War Two. America provided then, with the added responsibility of being a 'global policeman'. This requires it to constantly regulate what it perceives as international threats, making it unpopular to almost everyone in the world today. Yes, America might be using a wrong approach and also creating the image of a nation out to weaken everyone else in the world, we have to ask ourselves, what are we to do when this country whom we all want to disappear (off the face of this earth) really does? Would life really be better if America washes it's hands off international matters like it did? Would terrorism in the Middle East and Southeast Asia cease? Would North Korea really stop it's Nuclear programme with America no longer a threat? Would the economy get better without the USD? Would drug dealing in South America stop? Would MS-13 and other gangs dissolve? Would the 'Indian elephant' and 'Chinese dragon' continue to rise to economic power? Would the Swine flu pandemic slow down? Would hunger in Africa be solved? Racism? Animal Extinction? Whaling? There are so many problems in the world, instead of cursing at one country who's trying to do something about it, why not direct them at those who aren't. Just a thought


Are you sure you want to report this comment as offensive?