Donald Trump’s “Big Con”

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
 
 
 
In 1973, Robert Redford and the late Paul Newman starred in the Academy Award winning movie, “The Sting.”  It was a story about how two professional grifters conned a mob boss – an exploit they referred to as their “big – or long - con.” You might remember “The Sting” because Marvin Hamlisch revived Scott Joplin’s ragtime classic, “the Entertainer” as its theme song.
 
But the movie also offered great insight into the modus operandi of our new President, Donald Trump – and his own “big con.”
 
A con man picks out a “mark” – in Trump’s case, ordinary working people who have not seen their incomes go up in decades.  
 
Then he “plays” the mark.  He wins the “mark’s” confidence – hence the name “con man.”  He creates a plausible scenario to get the mark to willingly part with his money – and in Trump’s case – their votes and then their money.
 
The “sting” itself refers to the moment when the con is successful.  And if he has done it well, “the mark” does not realize he’s been conned until the con men are long gone.
 
Great con men operate like magicians. 
 
Magicians generally employ several distinct phases of activity to create their illusions.
 
First, the magician tells you what he is going to do – so you begin to expect to see what will actually be an illusion.
 
Second, the magician creates an elaborate preparation for the illusion – one that begins to convince your subconscious mind that it just may be plausible.
 
Finally, the magician directs your attention away from the site of the actual trick -- usually with something you can’t ignore.  The dove flies out of the hat. Or the magician uses comedy because, it turns out, recent neuroscience has found that humor suppresses attention.  Or maybe he separates the actual trick from the illusion in time, by completing the trick during the apparent preparation.
 
Then the magician – or the con man – presents you with an illusion that you believe.
 
We pay to see magicians because we want to be deceived and made to believe.   A magician convinces you that her assistant has been made to disappear – and you can’t prove it isn’t true until you see her walk out of the stage door after the performance – and you love it.
 
The con man is a different matter – with the con man, you’re furious to learn, often well after the fact, that you have been defrauded and scammed.
 
I’ll give him this: by winning the Presidency, Donald Trump showed himself to be one of the greatest con men of all time.  He conned many ordinary Americans into electing him President of the United States because they became convinced that he is on their side, when nothing could be further from the truth.
 
The good news is that, as President Obama said in his farewell address, reality has a way of catching up with you. 
 
Of course, winning the White House was not Donald Trump’s first con.  Like Henry Gondorff, Paul Newman’s character in “the Sting”, there were many and varied dotting his career.  Perhaps the most notorious was “Trump University” – a scheme so transparently fraudulent that he was forced to settle a lawsuit by paying victimized “students” $25 million before he assumed the Presidency. While he was busy trying to convince working people that he was on their side, he made his ties, his shirts, his perfume, his cuff links, his furniture and many of his other goods in low wage countries like Bangladesh, China, and Honduras.  And his hotels were using every tactic in the book to resist allowing his workers to unionize and negotiate over their wages and working conditions.
 
The ordinary working people who were conned by Trump in the big “presidential con” will not realize they were conned simply because people like me tell them they were duped.  Nobody wants to believe they were conned and telling them so will not be convincing.
 
But many of them will come to believe it on their own as they watch what he does rather than what he says in the months ahead.
 
In his dark inaugural address, Trump said that his administration would transfer power from the “elites” back to the American people.
 
But between that speech and the inaugural balls, Trump was busy signing an executive order aimed at beginning the process of taking health care away from what the Congressional Budget Office says would be 32 million ordinary Americans.
 
And he signed another order that would raise the cost of mortgage insurance by $500 per year for many first-time middle and lower income home-buyers.  Now Donald, that doesn’t sound much like standing up for ordinary Americans on the very first day of your presidency.
 
Meanwhile, Trump has appointed the most billionaire-laden cabinet in memory.  After promising to be a champion for ordinary people as an outsider, he has appointed the most insider cabinet imaginable -- what Senator Claire McCaskill referred to as a “three G Cabinet” – “Goldman (Sachs), Generals and Gazillionaires”.   And it includes many nominees who want to destroy the missions of their Departments – from environmental programs, to public education – all to benefit big corporations and the wealthy. Really?  That’s looking out for ordinary people?
 
And speaking of benefiting big corporations and the wealthy, Trump has actually proposed a gigantic tax cut for big corporations and wealthy people -- like his family.  That includes eliminating the inheritance tax that only applies to the sons and daughters of multi-millionaires like his kids.  Of course we don’t know how much they would actually benefit, since – because he won’t release his tax returns – we have no idea what he is actually worth.
 
But none of that will stop his populist rhetoric – or his fake stories about bringing jobs back to this city or that.  Like the con man that he is, he wants us to be distracted by shiny objects like the “wall” on the Mexican border, not the money he takes from the pockets of ordinary people.
 
In his inaugural address, Trump said, “The wealth of our middle class has been ripped from their homes and then redistributed across the entire world.”
 
Another con.  America’s trade policies often have not benefited the middle class.  But it isn’t because they so massively advantaged other countries.  It’s because they enhanced the power of huge corporations, CEO’s and the wealthy, relative to ordinary workers, in the U.S. and around the world.
 
In fact, America is wealthier today than it is ever been – wealthier than any other country on earth. America’s gross domestic product per person has increased 48% over the last 30 years.  That means all of us should be 48% better off than we were 30 years ago.  But ordinary people’s incomes have stagnated.  That’s not because all that money has flowed to foreign corporations.  It's because it has mainly been siphoned off by America’s billionaire class – people like Donald Trump.
 
Oxfam recently released a study showing that eight men control as much wealth as half of the world’s population combined.  Six of these are Americans. 
 
An Oxfam study also found that one percent of the world’s population now controls as much wealth as all of the other 99% combined.
 
The famous bank robber Willy Sutton said he robbed banks because, “that’s where the money is.”  When you want to know the reason that ordinary people’s incomes have stagnated, look at who got the money.
 
It wasn’t immigrants, or poor people, or people who don’t look like the belong in a Norman Rockwell painting who got all of that money.  Those Trump targets are nothing more than " shiny objects" intended to district us from what is really going on in Trump’s big con. Trump wants us to pay attention to them, while he and his billionaire pals that now run the government make off with all the loot.
 
Luckily, it isn’t taking long for people to begin to figure this out.
 
In the 45 years I have been working in progressive politics, I have never seen such a massive popular mobilization as the ones we have begun to see since the Trump election.  There were major mobilizations in the Civil Rights movement, against the wars in Viet Nam and Iraq, but never the kind of spontaneous energy that has exploded over the last several months.
 
A week and a half ago, it was a massive outpouring at rallies across the country demanding that Congress prevent Trump from taking way their health care coverage that has been made available by the Affordable Care Act.
 
This last weekend it was the astonishing mobilization of millions of women and their male supporters at the Women’s March in Washington, D. C, all around the country – and all over the world.
 
I attended the massive 250,000 person march in Chicago.  My wife, Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky joined the half million marchers in Washington.
 
Among the slogans on the thousands of homemade signs were:
 
“Never underestimate the power of extremely pissed-off women.”
 
“ I no longer accept the things I cannot change – I’m changing the things I cannot accept.”
 
“GOP: If you kill the ACA – you will all have hell to pay.”
 
“ My kitchen cabinet is more qualified than your presidential cabinet.”
 
“Fight like a girl.”
 
Respetar mi existencia o esperar mi resistencia” (Respect my existence or expect my resistance).
 
"Love not hate makes America great.”
 
“ Grab them by the emoluments – resist Trump”
 
“Nyet Trump”
 
“Yes We Can.”
 
From the Statue of Liberty: “Give me your tired, your poor – I lift my lamp before our golden door.”
 
And my favorite – was a mutation of failed GOP Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater’s famous 1964 slogan, “In Your Heart You Know He’s Right.”: 
 
“In Your Gut You Know He’s Nuts.”
 
But of course Trump isn’t nuts at all.  He’s crazy like a fox – like a great con man who has just made the sting of a lifetime.
 
There is of course one thing.  Most great con men are cool as a cucumber.  Trump’s Achilles heel is that he can’t let any slight pass.  He is a pathological narcissist.  That may be one of the reasons why Trump’s “marks” wake up to the fact that he intends to empty their pockets well before he and his billionaire friends have finished the job.

 
Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the book:  Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available on Amazon.com. He is a partner in Democracy Partners and a Senior Strategist for Americans United for Change. Follow him on Twitter @rbcreamer.

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Added 12.07.2018
The cabinet members who resigned this week apparently feared that politics is taking May toward a “soft Brexit,” their worst of all possible worlds........“soft Brexit,” maintains the status quo, more or less, letting Europeans freely circulate into British labor markets and allowing European firms to operate easily in the UK. The problem with “soft Brexit” is that it raises questions about why the UK is leaving at all, since it will still have the same obligations to Europe as before, it just won’t have a voice when the remaining 27 members of the European Union meet to make decisions.
Added 12.07.2018
One study on the 2010 World Cup found that there was a 37.5% rise in admission rates across 15 accident and emergency departments on England match days........Examining reports of domestic abuse in Lancashire (a county of approximately 1.5m people in Northern England), across the 2002, 2006 and 2010 World Cup tournaments, we discovered a 26% increase in reports of domestic abuse when England won or drew, and a 38% increase when England lost. Reports were also more frequent on weekends, and reached their peak when England exited the tournament.
Added 10.07.2018
If, back in the 1980s and 1990s, the US government, rather than arguing for Chinese economic opening, had prohibited any US company from investing there, China’s rise would have been significantly delayed, though not permanently prevented. Because that did not happen, China’s rise is now self-sustaining. A huge and increasingly affluent domestic market will make exports less vital to growth.
Added 10.07.2018
Comparing today’s demagogues with Adolf Hitler is almost always unwise. Such alarmism tends to trivialize the actual horrors of the Nazi regime, and distracts attention from our own political problems. But if alarmism is counterproductive, the question remains: At what point are democracies truly in danger? What was unimaginable only a few years ago – a US president insulting democratic allies and praising dictators, or calling the free press “enemies of the people,” or locking up refugees and taking away their children – has become almost normal now. When will it be too late to sound the alarm?
Added 09.07.2018
In view of such actions, expectations for Trump’s behavior at the upcoming summit have gone from prickly to dangerous. The sense of foreboding has been heightened by the announcement that, just four days after the summit ends, Trump will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, in Helsinki. The nightmare scenario is easy to imagine: Trump lays bare NATO’s fractures, including by questioning mutual defense, before selling his allies down the river by publicly embracing Putin. But this does not need to be the outcome.
Added 09.07.2018
After 2027 (or maybe even 2025, only 7 years from now), the number of EVs will rapidly accelerate, as virtually all new vehicles bought will be electric (an effect of rapidly falling battery and other component costs and of the fuel for electric cars being essentially free; you can power one off your rooftop solar array).
Added 03.07.2018
Most pundits interpret Trump’s outbursts as playing to his political base, or preening for the cameras, or blustering for the sake of striking future deals. We take a different view. In line with many of America’s renowned mental-health experts, we believe that Trump suffers from several psychological pathologies that render him a clear and present danger to the world.
Added 03.07.2018
In the United Kingdom, Brexit looms large, with everyone from government ministers to tabloid newspapers frothing daily about the deal that will be struck with the European Union and the effects that it will have. But the EU faces too many pressing challenges to be obsessing about Britain. The UK’s concern is understandable: evidence is mounting of the likely damage a departure from the single market and customs union will do to the UK economy. According to new research from the Centre for European Reform, the UK economy is already 2.1% smaller than it would have been had voters chosen to remain. The hit to public finances totals £440 million ($579 million) per week.
Added 26.06.2018
Nowadays, Britain’s words and actions on the world stage are so at odds with its values that one must wonder what has happened to the country. Since the June 2016 Brexit referendum, British foreign policy seems to have all but collapsed – and even to have disowned its past and its governing ideas. Worse, this has coincided with the emergence of US President Donald Trump’s erratic administration, which is pursuing goals that are completely detached from those of Britain – and of Europe generally. 
Added 26.06.2018
With each passing day, it becomes increasingly evident that US President Donald Trump’s administration cares less about economics and more about the aggressive exercise of political power. This is obviously a source of enormous frustration for those of us who practice the art and science of economics. But by now, the verdict is self-evident: Trump and his team continue to flaunt virtually every principle of conventional economics.
Added 26.06.2018
The sights and sounds of Central American children being ripped from their parents by US Border Patrol officers have, by now, spread across the globe. The experience has been traumatizing to its victims and deeply painful to watch. It has also done incalculable damage to the very idea of America. This is June when we are supposed to be celebrating "Immigrant Heritage Month". Each year, I have taken this opportunity to recall my family's immigrant story - the opportunity and freedom they sought, the hardships they endured, and the remarkable progress they made in just one generation. 
Added 24.06.2018
State terrorism comes in many forms, but one of its most cruel and revolting expressions is when it is aimed at children. Even though U.S. President Donald Trump backed down in the face of a scathing political and public outcry and ended his administration’s policy of separating migrant children from their parents, make no mistake: His actions were and remain a form of terrorism.
Added 22.06.2018
It is now clear that the twenty-first century is ushering in a new world order. As uncertainty and instability associated with that process spread around the globe, the West has responded with either timidity or nostalgia for older forms of nationalism that failed in the past and certainly will not work now. Even to the most inveterate optimist, the G7 summit in Quebec earlier this month was proof that the geopolitical West is breaking up and losing its global significance, and that the great destroyer of that American-created and American-led order is none other than the US president. To be sure, Donald Trump is more a symptom than a cause of the West’s disintegration. But he is accelerating the process dramatically.
Added 20.06.2018
Sessions quoted a line written by the apostle Paul to a small community of Christians living in Rome around 55AD to defend the Department of Justice’s approach. He said: "I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order." Sessions used the Bible because one of the most vocal opponents of the crackdown on asylum cases has been the Catholic Church. It’s no surprise that Sessions appealed to Romans chapter 13 verse 1 in response: not only did he hope to undermine Catholic authority by using the Bible against them, he cited a statement so broad that one might use it to defend anything a government does, good or bad. Picture below St Paul writing his epistles, by Valentin de Boulogne, via Wikimedia Commons.
Added 19.06.2018
 

I find it exceptionally irritating when I hear liberals worry about whether Israel will be able to remain a "Jewish and Democratic State" if it retains control of occupied Palestinian lands.

Added 18.06.2018
Daniel Wagner: "My prediction Korean War will be formally ended, the peninsula will be denuclearised, and a lasting peace will be the result."
Added 14.06.2018
Extract: PiS [ the ruling Law and Justice party] has established the most significant addition to the Polish social safety net since 1989: the Family 500+ program. Launched in 2016, Family 500+ embodies the nationalism, traditional family values, and social consciousness that the PiS seeks to promote. The program pays families 500 złoty ($144) per month to provide care for a second or subsequent child...........The program has been enormously popular. Some 2.4 million families took advantage of it in the first two years. The benefit, equivalent to 40% of the minimum wage, has almost wiped out extreme poverty for children in Poland, reducing it by an estimated 70-80%........... Liberal pro-European politicians and policymakers are not convinced. They complain that such a generous family benefit will weaken work incentives and blow up the government budget. But initial evidence suggests that Family 500+ has actually increased economic activity. It has also reversed the post-communist decline in fertility, increased wages (particularly for women), and enabled families to buy school materials, take vacations, buy more clothes for their kids, and rely less on high-priced credit for basic household needs. And, thanks to rapid economic growth, the government deficit has steadily fallen, not grown.
Added 12.06.2018
The depths of hypocrisy of the Republican Party in supporting Trump’s meeting with the North Korean dictator in Singapore are hard to plumb. This is a party whose leading members adopted the Ostrich Foreign Policy Principle for decades. If you don’t like a country’s government or political and economic system, pretend it does not exist.
Added 12.06.2018
US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has spoken out against China’s strategy of “intimidation and coercion” in the South China Sea, including the deployment of anti-ship missiles, surface-to-air missiles, and electronic jammers, and, more recently, the landing of nuclear-capable bomber aircraft at Woody Island. There are, Mattis warned, “consequences to China ignoring the international community.” But what consequences?
Added 12.06.2018
With a general election approaching in September, Swedish voters are being warned that now it’s their turn to be targeted by Russian interference in the democratic process. According to Sweden’s Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), which is leading the country’s efforts to counter foreign-influence operations, such interference is very likely, and citizens should be on the lookout for disinformation and fake news.