Obama’s Electoral Mandate and Where it Leaves Republicans

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
Sunday’s morning shows featured some astoundingly stupid comments from Republicans who claim to believe that on Election Day voters gave them a “mandate” to continue their attempts to obstruct President Obama’s agenda.
 
Apparently some Republican pundits are still living in the same parallel universe that allowed them to convince themselves that by now, President-elect Mitt Romney would be organizing his transition.
 
It really is mind-boggling. Notwithstanding all of the available evidence, they still believe that the American people want them to stand in the way of increases in taxes for the wealthiest two percent and to cut Medicare and Social Security benefits for future retirees.
 
Who got a mandate for his policies on Election Day?

The Presidential campaign focused like a laser on the question of whether tax rates should be increased for the top two percent of Americans or whether we should adopt Romney’s proposal to lower tax rates for the wealthy by another $5 trillion, and inevitably increase taxes on the middle class. 
 
The campaign centered on the Ryan-Romney budget that would have slashed spending on critical services for the poor and middle class, reduce funding for education, do away with Medicare and replace it with a voucher program that would increase out of pocket costs for seniors by $6,500 per year.
 
And it was clear throughout, that the Republicans continued to favor privatizing Social Security.
 
·      The Republican Presidential ticket lost by 332 electoral votes to 206 electoral votes.
·      Obama got 50.6% of the popular vote and Romney got 47.6% of the popular vote.
·      Democrats took two additional seats in the Senate and now hold a 55-45 edge.
·      The Senate Democratic caucus now includes more Progressive members and fewer Conservative members.
·      Democrats picked up at least 7 and probably 8 seats in the House, and nationwide got over a half a million more votes for their House candidates than did the Republicans – even though the Republicans continued to control the chamber.
 
And the verdict that was rendered at the ballot box could be seen in virtually every national opinion survey.
 
The election was a battle over the future of the middle class, and Obama won that battle.
 
A Greenberg-Quinlan Research poll found that by 51 to 42 percent the voters said Obama would do better restoring the middle class.
 
They found that by almost two-thirds, voters believed Social Security and Medicare should not be cut as part of a deficit reduction deal.
 
A November 15, 2012 Hart Research poll for Americans for Tax Fairness found that:
 
·      By a strong 17-point margin, voters favor ending the Bush tax cuts on incomes over $250,000 (56%) rather than extending the tax cuts for all taxpayers (39%).
·      President Obama now holds a commanding position in the debate over tax policy. When voters hear President Obama’s position on the Bush tax cuts – that he will sign a bill continuing them for 98% of Americans but will veto a bill continuing them for incomes over $250,000 – fully 61% agree with this stance.  By contrast, when voters are read congressional Republicans’ position – that they will pass a bill continuing the cuts for all income levels, but will block any bill ending the cuts for those making over $250,000 – only 42% agree while a 53% majority rejects its plan.
 
NBCNews.com’s First Read, November 15, 2012 - more autopsy 2012 – additional analysis of exit polls in battleground states:
 
·      Support for raising taxes for $250K+ earners or everyone – Nevada 64%, Wisconsin 64%, Virginia 63%, Iowa 63%, New Hampshire 61%, Ohio 57%, Florida 57% -- national average 60%.
 
Greenberg-Quinlan found in a November poll that Americans reject austerity in favor of investment that creates jobs.  They were asked to choose between two statements:
 
We should avoid immediate drastic cuts in spending, and instead, we need serious investments that create jobs and make us more prosperous in the long term that will reduce our debt, too.
 
      Or…
 
The only way to restore prosperity and market confidence is to dramatically reduce government spending and our long-term deficits.
 
The statement favoring investments was chosen by 51% compared to 42% for the statement favoring cuts.
 
In fact there is little question that voters understand better than many commentators and pundits that the budget battle in Washington is not mainly about ratios of revenue to cuts, or “reining in entitlements” – it is about who pays. 
 
Will the wealthy, who have siphoned off all of the economic growth of the last fifteen years, be asked to pay to fix the deficit that resulted from the Bush Tax cuts, and two unpaid-for Wars?   Or will the middle class – whose income has been stagnant or declining – be asked once again to foot the bill?
 
Voters get it.  Time for DC pundits to get it as well.
 
Voters did send a mandate to Republicans on November 6th – a mandate to wake up and smell the coffee.
 
Here are a few of the mandates the voters gave Republicans:
 
·      Bad idea to be viewed as a party who mainly represents the interests of the 1% and has candidates that were born on third base and think they hit a triple.
·      Bad idea to insult almost half of the voters with comments about the 47% who can’t be convinced to “take responsibility for their lives.”  
·      Bad idea to insult the fastest growing ethnic group in America with your plans for “self deportation” and vetoing the Dream Act.
·      Bad idea to patronize American women – who incidentally represent about 52% of the electorate – by telling them that government must intervene in the reproductive choices that should be left entirely to them and their doctors.
·      Bad idea to believe you can any longer win national races in America by insulting and alienating people of color.
·      Bad idea to ignore the persistent march of demographic changes that are transforming the American electorate.  In addition to the growing proportion of people of color, the millennial generation – the most consistently progressive generation in recent American history – is becoming a larger portion of the overall electorate with every passing day.
 
Finally, the voters sent a loud and clear message that it is a bad idea for the GOP to continue to be the party that opposes traditional progressive American values.
 
They voted to confirm their view that they want a society where we have each others’ backs – where we’re all in this together, not all in this alone.  They voted for a society where everyone does his or her fair share, gets a fair shake and plays by the same rules.  They want a society that is hopeful and vibrant and celebrates its diversity – a society where it doesn’t matter whether you are a man or woman, gay or straight – a society where it doesn’t matter where you were born, or how much money your parents had when you grew up. 
 
In short the voters showed once again that they want the kind of a society that Barack Obama described in his first major national speech – to the Democratic Convention in 2004 – a society where there are no blue states or red states – just the United States.
 
Now it’s time for the Republicans to lead, follow or get out of the way.
 

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Added 12.07.2018
The cabinet members who resigned this week apparently feared that politics is taking May toward a “soft Brexit,” their worst of all possible worlds........“soft Brexit,” maintains the status quo, more or less, letting Europeans freely circulate into British labor markets and allowing European firms to operate easily in the UK. The problem with “soft Brexit” is that it raises questions about why the UK is leaving at all, since it will still have the same obligations to Europe as before, it just won’t have a voice when the remaining 27 members of the European Union meet to make decisions.
Added 12.07.2018
One study on the 2010 World Cup found that there was a 37.5% rise in admission rates across 15 accident and emergency departments on England match days........Examining reports of domestic abuse in Lancashire (a county of approximately 1.5m people in Northern England), across the 2002, 2006 and 2010 World Cup tournaments, we discovered a 26% increase in reports of domestic abuse when England won or drew, and a 38% increase when England lost. Reports were also more frequent on weekends, and reached their peak when England exited the tournament.
Added 10.07.2018
If, back in the 1980s and 1990s, the US government, rather than arguing for Chinese economic opening, had prohibited any US company from investing there, China’s rise would have been significantly delayed, though not permanently prevented. Because that did not happen, China’s rise is now self-sustaining. A huge and increasingly affluent domestic market will make exports less vital to growth.
Added 10.07.2018
Comparing today’s demagogues with Adolf Hitler is almost always unwise. Such alarmism tends to trivialize the actual horrors of the Nazi regime, and distracts attention from our own political problems. But if alarmism is counterproductive, the question remains: At what point are democracies truly in danger? What was unimaginable only a few years ago – a US president insulting democratic allies and praising dictators, or calling the free press “enemies of the people,” or locking up refugees and taking away their children – has become almost normal now. When will it be too late to sound the alarm?
Added 09.07.2018
In view of such actions, expectations for Trump’s behavior at the upcoming summit have gone from prickly to dangerous. The sense of foreboding has been heightened by the announcement that, just four days after the summit ends, Trump will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, in Helsinki. The nightmare scenario is easy to imagine: Trump lays bare NATO’s fractures, including by questioning mutual defense, before selling his allies down the river by publicly embracing Putin. But this does not need to be the outcome.
Added 09.07.2018
After 2027 (or maybe even 2025, only 7 years from now), the number of EVs will rapidly accelerate, as virtually all new vehicles bought will be electric (an effect of rapidly falling battery and other component costs and of the fuel for electric cars being essentially free; you can power one off your rooftop solar array).
Added 03.07.2018
Most pundits interpret Trump’s outbursts as playing to his political base, or preening for the cameras, or blustering for the sake of striking future deals. We take a different view. In line with many of America’s renowned mental-health experts, we believe that Trump suffers from several psychological pathologies that render him a clear and present danger to the world.
Added 03.07.2018
In the United Kingdom, Brexit looms large, with everyone from government ministers to tabloid newspapers frothing daily about the deal that will be struck with the European Union and the effects that it will have. But the EU faces too many pressing challenges to be obsessing about Britain. The UK’s concern is understandable: evidence is mounting of the likely damage a departure from the single market and customs union will do to the UK economy. According to new research from the Centre for European Reform, the UK economy is already 2.1% smaller than it would have been had voters chosen to remain. The hit to public finances totals £440 million ($579 million) per week.
Added 26.06.2018
Nowadays, Britain’s words and actions on the world stage are so at odds with its values that one must wonder what has happened to the country. Since the June 2016 Brexit referendum, British foreign policy seems to have all but collapsed – and even to have disowned its past and its governing ideas. Worse, this has coincided with the emergence of US President Donald Trump’s erratic administration, which is pursuing goals that are completely detached from those of Britain – and of Europe generally. 
Added 26.06.2018
With each passing day, it becomes increasingly evident that US President Donald Trump’s administration cares less about economics and more about the aggressive exercise of political power. This is obviously a source of enormous frustration for those of us who practice the art and science of economics. But by now, the verdict is self-evident: Trump and his team continue to flaunt virtually every principle of conventional economics.
Added 26.06.2018
The sights and sounds of Central American children being ripped from their parents by US Border Patrol officers have, by now, spread across the globe. The experience has been traumatizing to its victims and deeply painful to watch. It has also done incalculable damage to the very idea of America. This is June when we are supposed to be celebrating "Immigrant Heritage Month". Each year, I have taken this opportunity to recall my family's immigrant story - the opportunity and freedom they sought, the hardships they endured, and the remarkable progress they made in just one generation. 
Added 24.06.2018
State terrorism comes in many forms, but one of its most cruel and revolting expressions is when it is aimed at children. Even though U.S. President Donald Trump backed down in the face of a scathing political and public outcry and ended his administration’s policy of separating migrant children from their parents, make no mistake: His actions were and remain a form of terrorism.
Added 22.06.2018
It is now clear that the twenty-first century is ushering in a new world order. As uncertainty and instability associated with that process spread around the globe, the West has responded with either timidity or nostalgia for older forms of nationalism that failed in the past and certainly will not work now. Even to the most inveterate optimist, the G7 summit in Quebec earlier this month was proof that the geopolitical West is breaking up and losing its global significance, and that the great destroyer of that American-created and American-led order is none other than the US president. To be sure, Donald Trump is more a symptom than a cause of the West’s disintegration. But he is accelerating the process dramatically.
Added 20.06.2018
Sessions quoted a line written by the apostle Paul to a small community of Christians living in Rome around 55AD to defend the Department of Justice’s approach. He said: "I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order." Sessions used the Bible because one of the most vocal opponents of the crackdown on asylum cases has been the Catholic Church. It’s no surprise that Sessions appealed to Romans chapter 13 verse 1 in response: not only did he hope to undermine Catholic authority by using the Bible against them, he cited a statement so broad that one might use it to defend anything a government does, good or bad. Picture below St Paul writing his epistles, by Valentin de Boulogne, via Wikimedia Commons.
Added 19.06.2018
 

I find it exceptionally irritating when I hear liberals worry about whether Israel will be able to remain a "Jewish and Democratic State" if it retains control of occupied Palestinian lands.

Added 18.06.2018
Daniel Wagner: "My prediction Korean War will be formally ended, the peninsula will be denuclearised, and a lasting peace will be the result."
Added 14.06.2018
Extract: PiS [ the ruling Law and Justice party] has established the most significant addition to the Polish social safety net since 1989: the Family 500+ program. Launched in 2016, Family 500+ embodies the nationalism, traditional family values, and social consciousness that the PiS seeks to promote. The program pays families 500 złoty ($144) per month to provide care for a second or subsequent child...........The program has been enormously popular. Some 2.4 million families took advantage of it in the first two years. The benefit, equivalent to 40% of the minimum wage, has almost wiped out extreme poverty for children in Poland, reducing it by an estimated 70-80%........... Liberal pro-European politicians and policymakers are not convinced. They complain that such a generous family benefit will weaken work incentives and blow up the government budget. But initial evidence suggests that Family 500+ has actually increased economic activity. It has also reversed the post-communist decline in fertility, increased wages (particularly for women), and enabled families to buy school materials, take vacations, buy more clothes for their kids, and rely less on high-priced credit for basic household needs. And, thanks to rapid economic growth, the government deficit has steadily fallen, not grown.
Added 12.06.2018
The depths of hypocrisy of the Republican Party in supporting Trump’s meeting with the North Korean dictator in Singapore are hard to plumb. This is a party whose leading members adopted the Ostrich Foreign Policy Principle for decades. If you don’t like a country’s government or political and economic system, pretend it does not exist.
Added 12.06.2018
US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has spoken out against China’s strategy of “intimidation and coercion” in the South China Sea, including the deployment of anti-ship missiles, surface-to-air missiles, and electronic jammers, and, more recently, the landing of nuclear-capable bomber aircraft at Woody Island. There are, Mattis warned, “consequences to China ignoring the international community.” But what consequences?
Added 12.06.2018
With a general election approaching in September, Swedish voters are being warned that now it’s their turn to be targeted by Russian interference in the democratic process. According to Sweden’s Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), which is leading the country’s efforts to counter foreign-influence operations, such interference is very likely, and citizens should be on the lookout for disinformation and fake news.