Mar 1st 2015

Darkness in Moscow

by Charles J. Reid

Charles J. Reid, Jr. was born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, where he majored in Latin, Classics, and History, and also did substantial coursework in classical Greek and modern European languages. It was during his undergraduate days that he developed an interest in canon law, doing a year of directed research in Roman and canon law under the supervision of James Brundage. Reid then attended the Catholic University of America, where he earned J.D. and J.C.L. (license in canon law) degrees. During his time at Catholic University, he organized a series of symposia on the bishops' pastoral letter on nuclear arms. The proceedings of these symposia were published under Reid's editorship as "Peace in a Nuclear Age: The Bishops' Pastoral Letter in Perspective" (Catholic University of America Press, 1986). This book was called by the New York Times "among the most scholarly and unsettling of responses" to the pastoral letter (December 28, 1986).Reid then attended Cornell University, where he earned a Ph.D. in the history of medieval law under the supervision of Brian Tierney. His thesis at Cornell was on the Christian, medieval origins of the western concept of individual rights. Over the last ten years, he has published a number of articles on the history of western rights thought, and is currently completing work on a book manuscript addressing this question.In 1991, Reid was appointed research associate in law and history at the Emory University School of Law, where he has worked closely with Harold Berman on the history of western law. He collaborated with Professor Berman on articles on the Lutheran legal science of the sixteenth century, the English legal science of the seventeenth century, and the flawed premises of Max Weber's legal historiography.While at Emory, Reid has also pursued a research agenda involving scholarship on the history of western notions of individual rights; the history of liberty of conscience in America; and the natural-law foundations of the jurisprudence of Judge John Noonan. He has also published articles on various aspects of the history of the English common law. He has had the chance to apply legal history in a forensic setting, serving as an expert witness in litigation involving the religious significance of Christian burial. Additionally, Reid has taught a seminar on the contribution of medieval canon law to the shaping of western constitutionalism.  Recently, Reid has become a featured blogger at the Huffington Post on current issues where religion, law and politics intersect.
The targeted, theatrically-staged murder of Boris Nemtsov represents both a culmination and  a turning point.  A culmination because it is impossible not to see it as a kind of horrific, grisly completion of a line of political murders perpetrated during Vlaidimir Putin’s tenure in office stretching back in time over a decade.  There was Sergei Yushchenkov (1950-2004), long-time liberal Russian parliamentarian who was murdered the day he registered his Liberal Russia Party for forthcoming elections.  Doubts continue to surround those who were ultimately convicted of his murder.  Then there was Anna Politkovskaya (1958-2006), the fearless investigative journalist and human-rights campaigner, shot dead outside her apartment in Moscow.  Some street criminals were found guilty eight years later, but who ordered the assassination?  That remains a mystery.  And then there is Alexander Litvinenko (1962-2006) poisoned to death in London by a polonium isotope.  My list is selective and abbreviated.  To resist Vladimir Putin is to court death.
 
But if the Nemtsov assassination is the latest, most dramatic link in a chain of murders running the length of Putin’s time in office, it also gives every indication of being a turning point.  For Nemtsov was a figure known and admired by the entire international community.  A trained and gifted physicist, he emerged as an important voice for reform in the Soviet Union’s last days and he was a principal figure in the Boris Yeltsin administration.  He rose in rank as high as deputy prime minister and appeared for much of the second half of the 1990s as a plausible successor to President Yeltsin himself.
 
The student of Russian and Soviet history will know that there are parallels to the Nemtsov murder and the one that comes most to mind is the killing of Sergei Kirov (1886-1934).  Kirov was a promising and energetic party leader from Azerbaijan.  At the Party Congress of 1934 he was elected to the Communist Party Central Committee with fewer negative votes than Joseph Stalin.  Thus he became Stalin’s rival.  And he was murdered inside Leningrad Party headquarters in December 1934.  Who ordered the assassination, it goes without saying, has never been determined.
 
The Kirov assassination opened the door to the instability of the middle and late 1930s.   Stalin’s old Bolshevik allies – men like Lev Kamenev and Grigory Zinoviev – were tried and executed.  The Great Purges commended with their show trials and mass killings.  Stalin’s tentacles finally reached even into the Western Hemisphere with the murder, in August 1940, of Leon Trotsky in Mexico City.
 
If the Nemtsov assassination is a turning point like the Kirov murder, what larger lessons can we draw from it?
 
First,  The murder represents not Vladimir Putin’s strength but his political weakness.  One does not tolerate or condone the murder of one’s opponents if one is dealing from a position of strength.  Nemtsov was among the principal organizers of  protests against the Ukrainian war scheduled for this weekend.  Protests might get out of hand.  Protests in places like Georgia (2003), Kyrgyzstan (2005), and Ukraine (2014) led ultimately to regime change in those places.  We are entitled to ask:  Were there fears that a protest in Moscow this might set off a similar chain reaction?
 
It is also said that Nemtsov was prepared to release evidence definitively linking Russia to the Ukrainian War.  No less a figure than Petro Poroshenko, the President of Ukraine, had made this charge.  If this is true and Nemtsov’s murder is an effort to conceal evidence of military involvement, then  the evidence must be truly damning.  We do not know how weak the Putin regime is internally, but chances are that this assassination will weaken it still further especially if it is trying to suppress incriminating evidence.
 
Second, the assassination is reflective of a certain reckless disregard.  This is so even if the Putin regime is finally determined not to be directly implicated in Nemtsov’s killing.  A political climate where such killings are tolerated, where they go unsolved, where they are brusquely and cavalierly dismissed by the authorities says to the world:  “we don’t care.  We don’t care what you think of our means and our methods.  Life in Moscow is a Hobbesian world, nasty, brutish, and short, especially for those who dare to question we autocrats who are running the show.”  And, of course, should it turn out that the Putin regime was involved in the murder, the recklessness it signifies is truly frightening.
 
Third, as with the killing of Kirov eighty years ago, we can expect that Nemtsov’s murder is the opening act to much greater instability.  Putin has enemies, both real and imaginary.  They could be anywhere, hiding around any corner.  In the military, in his general staff, in the Parliament, in the press, in the private sector, among the oligarchs, in the academy.  The paranoia that this killing will unleash will extend across the fabric of elite Russian society and have everybody looking over their shoulders.  After all, you don’t have to be an enemy to be on an enemy’s list.
 
Fourth, we in the West must realize that we are living in a time of maximum danger.  Vladimir Putin has spoken recklessly for many months about his reliance on and readiness to use nuclear weapons.  We must take him at his word.  Indeed, Michael Fallon, the UK Defense Minister, has warned of the possibility that Putin’s regime has “lowered the threshold” on the use of nuclear weapons.  Loose talk like Putin’s certainly reduces inhibitions.  The world thus may be closer to a nuclear exchange than anyone appreciates, and that is something that must be taken account of.
 
What, then, should the West do?
 
First, the West should support Putin’s democratic opposition.  That must be done discreetly, so as not to discredit them in the eyes of ordinary Russians.  Public opinion surveys suggest that Putin retains substantial popularity and that the liberalizers of the 1990s are still dimly regarded.  Support for the opposition must take account of these realities.  Still, the Nemtsov assassination is the kind of event that could begin to shift the public mood away from Putin and his dangerous game of defiance.
 
Second, the West must not be reckless itself.  It must bear in mind that it does not know where the nuclear tripwire lies and what might set it off.  One can, indeed, envision many scenarios in which tactical nuclear weapons are employed, either in Ukraine or somewhere along NATO’s eastern periphery.  Putin’s regime is both weak and reckless and may have nothing to lose, and that is a potentially catastrophic combination.  Accordingly, the West should avoid shipping arms to Ukraine at this time.  On the other hand, intelligence sharing and non-lethal forms of assistance are probably in order.
 
Third, the West should keep its sanctions regime in place and move to strengthen it.  Over the course of 2014, an ever-tightening body of economic sanctions and restrictions were imposed on Russian businesses and individuals.  The Russian energy sector, Russian-owned banks, and the Russian defense industry were especially affected.  Nations that have not yet subscribed to the sanctions should be encouraged to do so.  It would be wrong to call Russia a pariah state.  But the Putin regime is a pariah government, and the world should send an unequivocal message that it will not do business with such an entity.
 
On the other hand, our isolation of Russia must not be complete.  In particular, it may well be in our interest for Western generals to open lines of communication with senior Russian military personnel.  This should be done, if only to ensure that the Russian nuclear sword remains safely in its scabbard.
 
Fourth, China must be encouraged to side with the West in this confrontation.  No nation in the world today has a greater interest in stability than China.  The Chinese social contract more less asks its people to sacrifice political liberty and to sublimate a natural instinct to have children in return for an implicit promise by the regime of ever-increasing prosperity.  China is a trading nation that depends on global good will and good order.  Russia, on the other hand, is the world’s consummate threat to stability and order.  Even leaving to one side its murderous politics and its probable involvement in the Ukrainian War, Russia’s, and more specifically Putin’s, nuclear threats, place it beyond the pale of civilized standards.
 
What, then, should be the West’s goal?
 
The peaceful replacement of the Putin regime and the integration of Russia into the global order must be our priorities.  In the process, Russian interests must be respected.  Russia is, and always will be, a continental great power.  It possesses the strength of culture to be a powerful force for good in the world.  From its inventive and creative scientists, to its towering literary history, to its deeply moving, spiritually enriching religious faith, Russia can yet realize its true destiny – a great culture, a great civilization, sharing its wisdom and its insights with the world, and peacefully doing business with its neighbors.
 
 



 


This article is brought to you by the author who owns the copyright to the text.

Should you want to support the author’s creative work you can use the PayPal “Donate” button below.

Your donation is a transaction between you and the author. The proceeds go directly to the author’s PayPal account in full less PayPal’s commission.

Facts & Arts neither receives information about you, nor of your donation, nor does Facts & Arts receive a commission.

Facts & Arts does not pay the author, nor takes paid by the author, for the posting of the author's material on Facts & Arts. Facts & Arts finances its operations by selling advertising space.

 

 

Browse articles by author

More Essays

May 1st 2021
EXTRACT: " The sad reality is that the Mizrahim (Jews of Middle Eastern and North African descent) were discriminated against from the day of Israel’s inception, whose Ashkenazi (European Jewish) leaders viewed them as intellectually inferior, “backward,” and “too Arab,” and treated them as such, largely because the Ashkenazim agenda was to maintain their upper-class status while controlling the levers of power, which remain prevalent to this day." ..... " The greatest heartbreaking outcome is that for yet another generation of Israelis, growing up in these debilitating conditions has a direct effect on their cognitive development. A 2015 study published in Nature Neuroscience found that “family income is significantly correlated with children’s brain size…increases in income were associated with the greatest increases in brain surface area among the poorest children.” "
Apr 25th 2021
EXTRACT: "We all owe Farah Nabulsi an enormous debt of gratitude. In a short 24-minute film, The Present, she has exposed the oppressive indecency of the Israeli occupation while telling the deeply moving story of a Palestinian family. What is especially exciting is that after winning awards at a number of international film festivals​, Ms. Nabulsi has been nominated for an Academy Award for this remarkable work of art. " 
Apr 25th 2021
EXTRACT: "When I crashed to the floor of my home in Bordeaux recently after two months of Covid-19 dizziness, I was annoyed. The next day I collapsed again. Now I was worried. What I didn’t know was that my brain was sloshing around inside my skull, causing a mild concussion. Nor did I know that I was in for a whole new world of weird and wonderful hallucinations."
Apr 13th 2021
EXTRACT: "Overall, our review has found that there isn’t evidence to back up the claims that veganism is good for your heart. But that is partly because there are few studies ....... But veganism may have other health benefits. Vegans have been found to have a healthier weight and lower blood glucose levels than those who consume meat and dairy. They are also less likely to develop cancer, high blood pressure and diabetes. "
Apr 8th 2021
EXTRACT: "Pollock’s universe, the universe of Mural, cannot be said to be a rational universe. Nor is it simply devoid of all sense. It is not a purely imaginary world, although in it everything is in a constant state of flux. Mural invokes one of the oldest questions of philosophy, a question going back to the Pre-Socratic philosophers Parmenides and Heraclitus – namely, whether the nature of Reality constitutes unchanging permanence or constant movement and flux. For Pollock, the only thing that is truly unchanging is change itself. The only certainty is that all is uncertain."
Apr 8th 2021
EXTRACT: "Many present day politicians appear to have psychopathic and narcissistic traits too. It’s easy to spot such leaders, because they are always authoritarian, following hardline policies. They try to subvert democracy, to reduce the freedom of the press and clamp down on dissent. They are obsessed with national prestige, and often persecute minority groups. And they are always corrupt and lacking in moral principles."
Apr 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "This has led some to claim that not just half, but perhaps nearly all advertising money is wasted, at least online. There are similar results outside of commerce. One review of field experiments in political campaigning argued “the best estimate of the effects of campaign contact and advertising on Americans’ candidates choices in general elections is zero”. Zero!"
Mar 30th 2021
EXTRACT: "The Father is an extraordinary film, from Florian Zeller’s 2012 play entitled Le Père and directed by Zeller. I’m here to tell you why it is a ‘must see’." EDITOR'S NOTE: The official trailer is attached to the review.
Mar 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "Picasso was 26 in 1907, when he completed the Demoiselles; de Kooning was 48 in 1952, when he finished Woman I.  The difference in their ages was not an accident, for studies of hundreds of painters have revealed a striking regularity - the conceptual painters who preconceive their paintings, from Raphael to Warhol, consistently make their greatest contributions earlier in their careers than experimental painters, from Rembrandt to Pollock, who paint directly, without preparatory studies."
Mar 26th 2021
EXTRACT: "Mental toughness levels are influenced by many different factors. While genetics are partly responsible, a person’s environment is also relevant. For example, both positive experiences while you’re young and mental toughness training programmes have been found to make people mentally tougher."
Mar 20th 2021

The city of Homs has been ravaged by war, leaving millions of people homeless an

Mar 20th 2021
EXTRACT: "There are two main rival models of ethics: one is based on rights, the other on duties. The rights-based model, which traces its philosophical origins to the work of John Locke in the 17th century, starts from the assumption that individuals have rights ....... According to this approach, duties are related to rights, but only in a subordinate role. My right to health implies a duty on my country to provide some healthcare services, to the best of its abilities. This is arguably the dominant interpretation when philosophers talk about rights, including human rights." ........ "Your right to get sick, or to risk getting sick, could imply a duty on others to look after you during your illness." ..... "The pre-eminence of rights in our moral compass has vindicated unacceptable levels of selfishness. It is imperative to undertake a fundamental duty not to get sick, and to do everything in our means to avoid causing others to get sick. Morally speaking, duties should come first and should not be subordinated to rights." ..... "Putting duties before rights is not a new, revolutionary idea. In fact it is one of the oldest rules in the book of ethics. Primum non nocere, or first do no harm, is the core principle in the Hippocratic Oath historically taken by doctors, widely attributed to the ancient Greek philosopher and physician Hippocrates. It is also a fundamental principle in the moral philosophy of the Roman statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero, who in De Officiis (On Duties) argues that the first task of justice is to prevent men and women from causing harm to others."
Mar 18th 2021
EXTRACT: "Several studies have recently compared the difference between antibodies produced straight after a coronavirus infection and those that can be detected six months later. The findings have been both impressive and reassuring. Although there are fewer coronavirus-specific antibodies detectable in the blood six months after infection, the antibodies that remain have undergone significant changes. …….. the “mature” antibodies were better at recognising the variants."
Mar 15th 2021
EXTRACT: "Like Shakespeare, Goya sees evil as something existing in itself – indeed, the horror of evil arises precisely from its excess. It overflows and refuses to be contained by or integrated into our categories of reason or comprehension. By its very nature, evil refuses to remain within prescribed bounds – to remain fixed, say, within an economy where evil is counterbalanced by good. Evil is always excess of evil." ....... "Nowhere is this more evident than in war. Goya offers us a profound and sustained meditation on the nature of war ........ The image of a Napoleonic soldier gazing indifferently on a man who has been summarily hanged, probably by his own belt, expresses the tragedy of war – its dehumanization of both war’s victims and victors."
Mar 14th 2021
EXTRACT: "A blockchain company has bought a piece of Banksy artwork and burnt it. But instead of destroying the value of the art, they claim to have made it more valuable, because it was sold as a piece of blockchain art. The company behind the stunt, called Injective Protocol, bought the screen print from a New York gallery. They then live-streamed its burning on the Twitter account BurntBanksy. But why would anyone buy a piece of art just to burn it? Understanding the answer requires us to delve into the tricky world of blockchain or “NFT” art."
Mar 14th 2021
EXTRACT: "Exercise is good for your health at every age – and you can reap the benefits no matter how late in life you start. But our latest research has shown another benefit of being physically active throughout life. We found that in the US, people who were more physically active as teenagers and throughout adulthood had lower healthcare costs."
Mar 10th 2021
EXTRACT: "Although around one in 14 people over 65 have Alzheimer’s disease, there’s still no cure, and no way to prevent the disease from progressing. But a recent study may bring us one step closer to preventing Alzheimer’s. The trial, which was conducted on animals, has found a specific molecule can prevent the buildup of a toxic protein known to cause Alzheimer’s in the brain."
Feb 24th 2021
EXTRACT: "The art historian George Kubler observed that scholars in the humanities “pretend to despise measurement because of its ‘scientific’ nature.” As if to illustrate his point Robert Storr, former dean of Yale’s School of Art, declared that artistic success is “completely unquantifiable.” In fact, however, artistic success can be quantified, in several ways. One of these is based on the analysis of texts produced by art scholars, and this measure can give us a systematic understanding of how changes in recent art have produced changes in the canon of art history."
Feb 24th 2021
EXTRACT: "The most politically sensitive option we looked at was the virus escaping from a laboratory. We concluded this was extremely unlikely."
Feb 16th 2021
EXTRACT: ".... these men were completely unaware that they had put their lives in the hands of doctors who not only had no intention of healing them but were committed to observing them until the final autopsy – since it was believed that an autopsy alone could scientifically confirm the study’s findings. As one researcher wrote in a 1933 letter to a colleague, “As I see, we have no further interest in these patients until they die.” ...... The unquestionable ethical failure of Tuskegee is one with which we must grapple, and of which we must never lose sight, lest we allow such moral disasters to repeat themselves. "