Sep 17th 2016

Stop making health and well-being a moral issue

by Rafael Euba

Consultant and Senior Lecturer in Old Age Psychiatry, King's College London

Applying a human moral construct to nature by dividing foods and lifestyles into good and bad is misleading. In reality, nothing in nature is either good or bad. For instance, our bodies need cholesterol for a variety of important purposes, while exercise and sports can be dangerous and even capable of ending our lives prematurely.

A recent study published in the BMJ concluded that replacing saturated with polyunsaturated fat in diet may not prolong life, contradicting decades of received medical wisdom. Curiously, this conclusion was not based on new data, but rather on a new interpretation of old data. At the same time, we are witnessing a growing trend towards the demonisation of sugar, with calls for a tax on sugary drinks.

The empirical evidence supporting the health benefits of drinking alcohol in moderation was largely ignored by the chief medical officer, Sally Davies, when she recently cut down the recommended daily limit. The press later revealed that the committee that had drafted the guidelines had close links with the modern temperance movement.

Orthorexia nervosa”, an excessive preoccupation with “healthy” eating, has become a recognised clinical entity. Orthorexic patients apply moral qualities to their diet, developing in the process an affinity towards foods that are thought to improve health, and strong – even pathological – aversions against those foods that are believed to damage it. The emotions involved are so strong that patients will sometimes paradoxically compromise their nutrition in their quest for “the perfect diet”.

Product information in the supermarket shelves often includes moral claims, with labels such as “fair trade”, “be good to yourself” or “drink responsibly”.

We tend to attribute moral characteristics to food and lifestyle choices according to a perceived inverse correlation between pleasure and health. In this perverse “pleasure economy”, life can only be extended by renouncing and containing hedonism, just like the virtuous renounced all the pleasures of the flesh in order to access paradise in more religious times than ours.

In this way, a wholesome and unpleasurable diet, in conjunction with daily, and equally unpleasurable and strenuous exercise, will earn us the right to prolong our lives, while indulging in unearned and therefore illicit pleasure (such as alcohol, fats and sugar) will be punished with an early death.

French temperance poster. Frédéric Christol

Nature doesn’t care about good and bad

Underpinning this moralistic approach is the idea of nature as a person with a moral code and a plan. It seems we have not fully accepted the mechanistic randomness of evolution and continue to attach a personal will to nature, as the successor of God in our secular society. In this context, we also see all things natural as good and man-made artifice as bad, ignoring the fact that illness and death are the most natural of events, often prevented by very artificial medical interventions.

In fact, nature (if it were a person) is only concerned with survival and reproduction. Indeed, we like fats and sugar precisely because the scarcity of high-calorie nutrition was the main threat to survival in pre-industrial societies. So it is nature that has programmed us to desire them, for the same reason it programmed us to like sex: having a desire for fats and sex helps with survival and reproduction. Good things are associated with pleasure precisely because they are good for us, while we associate bad and dangerous things with fear and pain.

Unfortunately, pleasure can also be problematic for survival when it can be experienced without any constraints or limits. When pleasure can be had constantly, the benefit that was originally associated with it and facilitated survival – in this case, the energy contained in fats and sugar – is cancelled.

Just as we feel the need to tame our sexual desires with moral rules in order to avoid social chaos, we also seem to have developed the need to moralise other pleasurable choices, now that our access to them has become too easy.

The fact is that, ultimately, nature does not really care much about our moral choices. Even the nutritionally virtuous will die one day, just like the rest of us.


This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Browse articles by author

More Essays

Jan 1st 2015

As the end of the year approaches, we reflect on the past year and make resolutions for the one ahead, celebrating the transition between old and new.

Dec 31st 2014

What do James Taylor and The Beatles have in common with the Head of the National Institute of Health?

Dec 30th 2014

Our poor old world lurches from crisis to crisis:

Ebola.  Ferguson. Syria. ISIS.

So New Year’s most welcome.  Let’s start again

With peace on earth and goodwill toward men.

Dec 26th 2014
I am a member of the Lotos Club in Manhattan, a literary club celebrated for having Mark Twain as its most famous member. Apparently, he had spent many happy hours with fellow members there in his declining years.
Dec 24th 2014

Do we need religion in order to be moral?
Dec 22nd 2014

Rudy Giuliani is blaming President Obama for the murder of two NYPD officers.

Dec 21st 2014

The holiday season is always a good time to take stock of the year just past and see what we might anticipate in the 12 months to come. In the case of Pope Francis, it is fair to say that a great deal went well.

Dec 20th 2014

The day went something like a Keystone Kops comedy from the silent movie era.

Dec 18th 2014

Pope Francis has opened the Pearly Gates to Blue Heelers.

Dec 18th 2014

William Shatner is daring to go where no author has gone before. 

The original Star Trek captain is using modern technology—Kickstarter—to fund a campaign to publish and market a new book.

Dec 16th 2014

There is a growing crisis haunting the Catholic Church. And it is a crisis larger than the events that have so greatly afflicted the American Catholic Church. The pedophilia scandals are a horrifying element of this crisis. So, too, are the bishops who covered up and excused these outrages.

Dec 14th 2014

We are haunted during the holidays by things done and left undone, but especially by the Ghost of Christmas Past.

Dec 11th 2014

Many of us are deeply grieved by the recent events surrounding The New Republic, where Chris Hughes, its current publisher, having rejected the magazine's time-hon

Dec 4th 2014
            A long time ago, I was a kid.

            And when I was a kid, I played.

Dec 4th 2014

Popes are not merely the head of a Church. Because they are the spiritual leader of a billion people, popes also have a role to play in shaping and forming global order. And historically, there have been popes who have used this position to change the direction of world events.

Dec 4th 2014

With the same predictability and inevitability of a House vote to abolish Obamacare, Bill O'Reilly yet again has declared his false war on the faux 

Dec 2nd 2014

So it’s Saturday night, date night, and I’m looking for somewhere fun to take my wife.  Then I see there’s something called Ice Theatre of New York.  And The New York Times has called it one of the 10 best cultural experiences in New York City.

Dec 2nd 2014

Roderick Thorp was part of a small group of novelists who came together on a monthly basis in the late eighties in Los Angeles to chew the fat.

Dec 2nd 2014

Are Western historians going soft on the Cold War that the Russians waged against the West for 45 years?