Sep 29th 2010

Four More Reasons Why Democrats Will Retain Control of House and Senate

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

Over the last several weeks, the Pollster.com average of polls testing the generic choice of Republican versus Democrat for Congress has begun to close from a spread of almost 5% down to only 2.3% advantage to Republicans.  If the present trend continues, Democrats will soon take the lead.

That trend is just one more indicator that the momentum in the battle to control the two houses of Congress has begun to shift.  This trend will accelerate in the five weeks remaining until Election Day.  There are four particularly important reasons why:

 1). The gap in daily spending between Democrats and Republicans will close.

The effect of the Citizens United case – and the disproportionate advantage of corporate-backed outside groups has been substantial over the last few weeks. Some days the advantage to the right has been on the order of 10 or 15 to one. But that advantage will diminish as Election Day approaches.  Campaigns and independent expenditure committees with finite amounts of money put first priority on spending during the weeks closer to the election when undecided voters tend to make their decisions.   So spending by Democrats and their allies will accelerate every week until the election.

Even if, as expected, the Republicans and their supporters continue to spend more than Democrats in key races, the relative value of each dollar spent will decline dramatically as total spending on communication rises.  If a voter sees a right-wing spot six times and a spot for Progressives only once, the Right has an enormous advantage.  But if a voter sees a Republican spot 25 times and a Democratic spot 20 times, the relative value of the five-spot Republican margin diminishes enormously.

What’s more, in some races, Democrats and their allies are already matching Republicans.  Last week in Illinois, of the $1.5 million spent on television in the U.S. Senate race, Democrats spent $700,000 ($500,000 from the Giannoulias Campaign and $200,000 from the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee) and Republicans spent $723,000 ($363,000 from the Kirk Campaign, and $360,000 from American Crossroads, the corporate attack fund organized by Karl Rove).

 2). Voters are beginning to focus on the choice facing them between specific living, breathing candidates – not “generic” ballots.  That contrast will not be good for Republican chances.

In 1994, the Republicans caught Democrats off guard.  Not this time.  Democrats have done their home work, learning every detail about their opponents.  And their task has been helped along by the Tea Party’s successful efforts to promote incredibly flawed candidates in many Republican primaries.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that Democrat campaigns have pulled the trigger on a long-planned strategy to take the offensive and use this ammunition to define their opponents.

 In the past, Republicans could sometimes count on Democrats to run milquetoast campaigns.  This time they are coming out with all guns blazing.

 Congresswoman Betty Sutton (D, OH-13) is going after her opponent, car dealer Tom Ganley, defining him as a “dishonest used car salesman” who has been sued more than 400 times for fraud, discrimination, lying to customers and overcharging them.

 The NYT reports that in Arizona, Congressman Harry Mitchell (D, AZ-5) accused his opponent, David Schweikert of being “a predatory real estate speculator who snatched up nearly 300 foreclosed homes, been cited for neglect and evicted a homeowner on the verge of saving his house, just to make a buck.”

 And it reports that Representative Mike Arcuri (D, NY-24) has introduced his opponent to the voters as a millionaire who “got rich while his construction company overcharged taxpayers thousands, was sued three times for injuries caused by faulty construction and was cited 12 times for health and safety violations.”

 In Wisconsin’s 8th CD, Democrat Steve Kagen  has unleashed ads showing his opponent, roofing contractor Reid Ribble, on tape saying he wants to “phase out Social Security.”

 In races across the country, Democrats will give voters the opportunity to examine Republicans in gory detail – up close and personal -- before Election Day.  Voters will be able to examine their beliefs and proposals – and their personal values.  Make absolutely no mistake that the Democratic Congressional and Senate Campaign Committees, and most campaigns, have every intention of taking the offensive in personalizing these races and making the choices before the voters crystal clear.

 3). President Obama has switched into campaign mode. At the national level President Obama, who has the biggest bully pulpit in the country, will use every means to define the choice before American voters.

Obama’s team has decided – correctly – to personify this choice in the person of Republican Leader John Boehner – with a little dash of Paul Ryan and his “Young Gun” associates, Congressmen Eric Cantor and Kevin McCarthy.   Over the last few days they have made Swiss cheese of the Republican’s most recent wet noodle attempt to revive the famous “Contract with America” that helped propel them to victory in 1994.  In particular they have challenged Republicans to “promise” to stop outsourcing American jobs – a subject on which their “promise” is appropriately silent, given their opposition to Democratic moves to eliminate corporate tax breaks for jobs shipped overseas.   

The Administration, Democratic leadership and progressive organizations will continue to ramp up campaigns to focus attention on Republican plans to privatize Social Security and replace Medicare with vouchers.  They will hammer at Republican plans to repeal the Wall Street reform bill that reined in the power of the big Wall Street banks whose recklessness cost eight million Americans their jobs.

Democrats will force the Republicans to defend their attempts to hold middle-class tax cuts hostage in order to provide a $700 billion tax break to millionaires and billionaires – which is, after all, one of the Republican Party leadership’s primary goals.

And just as important, President Obama has begun to stump the country and rouse the sleeping Obama electorate.

 4). Perhaps most important, the enthusiasm gap will close.  

In 1994 Democrats didn’t lose because voters disagreed with them on the issues.  They lost because Republican voters went to the polls and Democrats stayed home.

The current enthusiasm gap will close for two key reasons.  First, as Democrats – at all levels – sharpen and repeatedly define the choices facing the country,  many occasional voters who have not been paying close attention will begin to understand the consequences of these elections. 

One important group will be Latino voters, who have decided to stand up to the brazen attacks on Hispanics and their culture that have been spewing forth from Republicans across the country – from attempts to repeal the 14th Amendment, to support for the Arizona “papers please” law, to last week’s united Republican opposition to even considering the “Dream Act.” 

The “Dream Act” would allow undocumented kids, who were brought by their parents to the United States -- through no fault of their own -- and raised here as Americans, to continue to get a higher education, serve in the military and apply for citizenship.   For years, some Republicans have supported the “Dream Act,” but were unwilling to break with their leadership to support the bill last week when it came up for a vote in the Senate. 

The same goes for gay Americans, who were denied a vote on ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” last week because of united Republican opposition:  occasional voters from this community, too, are beginning to more clearly feel the consequences of these elections. 

The same is true for Muslims who, while they constitute only about 3% of American voters, have been pretty fired up by gratuitous exploitation of Islamaphobia by Republicans coast to coast. 

And the same is true for union members who increasingly understand that the economic policies of the Republicans are anti-union and anti-middle class.

And increasingly the same will go for young people, African Americans and millions of other ordinary Americans who were inspired by the prospect of economic and political change in 2008, and don’t want to go back to the failed economic policies that drove the economy off the cliff in the first place.

But there is a second reason why progressive voters will wake up before Election Day.  For months, Democratic campaigns have been preparing the most robust off-year Get Out the Vote effort in American history.

For example, last Saturday the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) had a National Day of Action that engaged volunteer-staffed canvasses in contested Congressional Districts across the country.  On that one day, volunteers knocked on 200,000 doors.

Democratic candidates, the DCCC, Democratic Senate Campaign Committee and President Obama’s field organization – Organize for America -- will have serious field programs in virtually all in-play Congressional Districts and every in-play Senate state.  Those field programs will contact millions of voters before Election Day, encourage vote-by-mail and vote early programs and ultimately make millions of door knocks on Election Day itself. 

My consulting firm participated in a study several years ago that showed that one door to door contact within 72 hours of Election Day increased the propensity to vote by 12.5%.  A second one in the same period increased turnout almost as much. 

These contacts will be supplemented by major member to member campaigns launched by organized labor and organizations like MoveOn.org. 

The message from candidates, the President and leaders of important Democratic constituencies like Latinos and labor about what is at stake in this election will do a lot to increase turnout.  But so will the old-fashioned message: “I won’t get off your porch until you vote.”

In the end, Republicans would have to take ten Democratic seats to gain control of the Senate and 39 Democratic seats to take over the House.

Christine O’Donnell’s victory in the Delaware Republican Primary makes it almost impossible for Republicans in the Senate to take control of the gavel.

In the House, it is likely that Democrats will gain five currently-Republican seats: DE-AL, IL-10, FL-25, LA-2, and HI-1.  That would mean that to take control of the House, Republicans would have to win forty-four currently-Democratic seats.  Even with a huge surge at their back, that would be a real lift; more so because the polls show Republicans are actually regarded favorably by 6% fewer Americans than are Democrats. There is no clamor for Republican leadership abroad in the land – and no charismatic Republican leader who appeals to a broad cross section of Americans.

A district by district analysis shows Democrats doing better than Republicans in many swing districts.

Five weeks from Election Day, many of the pundits have already written a script that calls for a big Democratic defeat November 2.  But if Democrats drive hard to the finish, if we stay on the offensive and make this election a choice, and if we do everything in our power to turn out every Democratic vote, the pundit’s script will never make it into the actual annals of American history.  Instead it will be filed away in the fiction section where it belongs.

 

Robert Creamer's recent book: “Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win,” available on  amazon.com.

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Feb 18th 2022
EXTRACT: "........ Xi did what was needed to lock Russia into a vassal-like dependency on China. And Putin chose to walk straight into his trap, thinking that partnership with Xi would help him in his confrontation with the West. ---- What could be better for China than a Russian economy completely cut off from the West? All the natural gas that does not flow westward to Europe could flow eastward to an energy-hungry China. All Siberia’s mineral wealth, which Russia has required Western capital and expertise to exploit, would be available only to China, as would major new infrastructure projects in Russia." ---- "Putin seems to be ignoring that China’s leaders and people view Russia as a corrupt country which stole more Chinese territory in the nineteenth century than any other."
Feb 14th 2022
EXTRACT: "Russia’s large-scale military mobilization on Ukraine’s border has grim historic precedents. But should the Kremlin pull the trigger, it will encounter a hazard that no invading army has ever faced before: 15 nuclear power reactors, which generate roughly 50% of Ukraine’s energy needs at four sites. The reactors present a daunting specter. If struck, the installations could effectively become radiological mines. And Russia itself would be a victim of the ensuing wind-borne radioactive debris. Given the vulnerability of Ukraine’s nuclear reactors and the human and environmental devastation that would follow if combat were to damage them, Russian President Vladimir Putin should think again about whether Ukraine is worth a war."
Feb 11th 2022
EXTRACT: "Yet Putin gives Xi precisely what he wants: a partner who can destabilize the Western alliance and deflect America’s strategic focus away from its China containment strategy. From Xi’s perspective, that leaves the door wide open for China’s ascendancy to great-power status, realizing the promise of national rejuvenation set forth in Xi’s cherished “China Dream.” "
Feb 10th 2022
EXTRACTS: "It has become abundantly clear that the United States has an inflation problem. What is not yet clear is how big the problem will turn out to be and how long it will last. ---- "Alarmed observers point to parallels with the 1970s, when commodity prices shot up,..." ------ "Today, in contrast, inflation expectations remain firmly anchored. The Michigan Survey of Consumers shows that respondents expect inflation to approach 5% over the coming year, before falling back to just above 2% in the subsequent four years. The inflation rate implicit in the price of five-year inflation-indexed Treasury securities shows basically the same thing: inflation averaging 2.8% over the next five years."
Jan 26th 2022
EXTRACT: "Over the past three decades, bonds have offered a negative overall yearly return only a few times. The decline of inflation rates from double-digit levels to very low single digits produced a long bull market in bonds; yields fell and returns on bonds were highly positive as their price rose. The past 30 years thus have contrasted sharply with the stagflationary 1970s, when bond yields skyrocketed alongside higher inflation, leading to massive market losses for bonds."
Jan 26th 2022
EXTRACT: "The idea of a conventional force attack by Russia on Poland, the Baltic or Black Sea states is fanciful. But it is rendered near impossible in the minds of the Kremlin leadership by the sure knowledge that Nato would take a stand. In response to events around Ukraine, the credibility of the alliance is being affirmed through a set of coordinated measures...." ---- "The forces Moscow has assembled on Ukraine’s borders are clearly intended to intimidate the government in Kyiv. But as the weeks drag on Russia may be losing the military advantage. It has already forfeited the element of surprise essential for a swift land grab (as was used during the seizure of Crimea in 2014)."
Jan 25th 2022
EXTRACT: "By now, it is passé to warn that the Fed is “behind the curve.” In fact, the Fed is so far behind that it can’t even see the curve. Its dot plots, not only for this year but also for 2023 and 2024, don’t do justice to the extent of monetary tightening that most likely will be required as the Fed scrambles to bring inflation back under control. In the meantime, financial markets are in for a very rude awakening."
Jan 25th 2022
EXTRACT: "As it is, Germany has made strides in getting off coal. Coal provided half of power production in 2000, and is now down to about a little over a quarter. And Germany has done more to put in renewables, with its “Energiewende” or Energy Switch, than any other large industrialized nation. The new Social Democratic government, which is in coalition with the Greens, plans to put enormous amounts of new renewables in every year until 2030, projecting that by that date, 80 percent of Germany’s power will come from renewables."
Jan 21st 2022
EXTRACTS: "The fear is that Moscow is backing itself into a diplomatic corner where the use of force is its only way to remain credible." ----- "The Ukrainian population has also been mobilizing in support of the troops since the seizure of Crimea and the war in Donbas. And according to a poll taken in December 2021 by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 58% of Ukrainian men and almost 13% of women declared that they are ready to take up arms. A further 17% and 25% more said they would resist through other means. In what would be a classic case of asymmetrical warfare, resistance from Ukraine’s population could therefore prove a serious thorn in Moscow’s side."
Jan 12th 2022
EXTRACTS: "While at the time of writing, the outcome of Djokovic’s visa troubles was uncertain, the double standard of rules raises a much bigger question about the philosophy of law: can the application of a rule be so unfair that we have no valid reason to follow it?" ------ "......a rule that doesn’t treat like cases alike can’t be a law at all. This is because a key requirement of a legal system is that it needs to be stable, which means that people need to know what the law is and when it applies. If a rule doesn’t treat everyone equally, then it does the opposite and increases doubt and uncertainty about what the law even is. And if enough rules exist that create uncertainty about what the law is and when it applies, the system will collapse. A rule that undermines a legal system in this way can’t really be law at all, and legal officials shouldn’t create or uphold them."
Jan 9th 2022
EXTRACT: "Novak Djokovic, the world’s top-ranking tennis player, has just been granted a medical exemption to take part in the Australian Open. Djokovic, who has won the event nine times (one more victory would give him a record-breaking 21 major titles), refused to show proof of vaccination, which is required to enter Australia. “I will not reveal my status whether I have been vaccinated or not,” he told Blic, a Serbian daily, calling it “a private matter and an inappropriate inquiry.” The family of Dale Weeks, who died last month at the age of 78, would disagree. Weeks was a patient at a small hospital in rural Iowa, being treated for sepsis. The hospital sought to transfer him to a larger hospital where he could have surgery, but a surge in COVID-19 patients, almost all of them unvaccinated, meant that there were no spare beds. It took 15 days for Weeks to obtain a transfer, and by then, it was too late."
Jan 9th 2022
EXTRACT: "The protests that erupted across Kazakhstan on January 2 quickly turned into riots in all of the country’s major cities. What do the protesters want, and what will be the outcome of the country’s most severe civil unrest since independence in 1991? "
Jan 7th 2022
EXTRACT: ".....one wonders how Chinese President Xi Jinping views Russia’s intervention in Kazakhstan, which shares a nearly 1,800-kilometer (1,120-mile) border with China, especially in light of Putin’s earlier comments diminishing the history of Kazakhstan’s independent statehood. (He has shown similar contempt for the independence of Belarus, the Baltic states, and Ukraine.)"
Jan 7th 2022
EXTRACT: "The problem with history as propaganda is not that it makes people feel good or bad, but that it creates perpetual enemies – and thus the perpetual risk of wars."
Jan 5th 2022
EXTRACT: ".....a scenario in which Trump (or one of his allies) is designated president by the House of Representatives after the 2024 election probably belongs in the realm of political-thriller fiction.  Now consider the unlikely event that Trump were nominated and won a clear Electoral College or popular-vote majority in 2024. Rather than establish the white-nationalist dictatorship of progressive nightmares, an elderly second-term Trump would most likely be an even more ineffectual figurehead in a party dominated by conventional Republicans than he was in his first four years. If Italian democracy could survive three terms of Silvio Berlusconi as prime minister, American democracy can survive two terms of Trump. None of this is to suggest that American democracy is not under threat. Populist demagogues like Trump are symptoms of a disease in the body politic. The real threat to American democracy is the disconnect between what the bipartisan US political establishment promises and what it delivers. This problem predates Trump by decades and helps to explain his rise. "
Jan 4th 2022
EXTRACT: "This month, the world’s major central banks shifted gears and announced plans to tighten monetary policy. But there was one notable exception: the European Central Bank, which says it does not intend to raise interest rates in 2022, even though it is well aware of today’s inflation risks." ----- "Does this mean that the ECB is “soft on inflation,” occupying a dovish outlier position among the world’s major central banks? Is Germany’s bestselling tabloid, Bild, justified in bestowing on ECB President Christine Lagarde the mocking sobriquet “Madame Inflation”? No and no.
Dec 21st 2021
EXTRACTS: "By the grim metric of fatalities in the first 10 years of a dictator’s rule, Kim Jong Un has yet to match the records set by his grandfather, Kim Il Sung, or father, Kim Jong Il – the two tyrants who reigned by terror in North Korea before him. For now, the number of people Kim Jong Un has personally ordered killed – such as his uncle in 2013 and half-brother in 2017 – is likely to number in the hundreds." ---- "Concrete numbers of how many have died from starvation and malnourishment-related conditions such as diarrhea and pneumonia under Kim are difficult to come by. But as a scholar of Korean history, I believe the young dictator – who turns 38 next January – has the capacity to surpass even the ghastly death tolls of his two familial predecessors."
Dec 19th 2021
EXTRACTS: "But have enough Conservative backbenchers reached the conclusion that Johnson should be removed as party leader? There is a historical precedent which throws light on the present situation. This was when Margaret Thatcher was sacked as leader of her party – and consequently lost her job as prime minister – in 1990. She had a loyal following in the party and had won three elections in a row, but even that couldn’t save her when polling showed that the Conservatives were heading for a serious defeat under her leadership. ---- "That said, if Thatcher’s experience is anything to go by, at present the Conservatives are not going to sack Johnson. It took 18 months of seriously deteriorating polling for a revolt over Thatcher’s leadership to finally succeed – and she almost survived the leadership challenge. The present hope among Conservative backbenchers will be that the party can recover next year."
Dec 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "Although Johnson has a well-deserved reputation for maintaining an arm’s-length relationship with the truth, many voters seem to have priced this in to how they perceive him. Moreover, Conservative Party insiders, and those who previously worked with Johnson in journalism (his career before politics), have always known that he was unlikely to follow any rules that did not suit him. This rather large personal failing was apparent even in his boyhood, as a remarkably prescient school report by his Eton College housemaster noted. “I think,” Johnson’s teacher wrote, “he honestly believes that it is churlish of us not to regard him as an exception, one who should be free of the network of obligation which binds everyone else.” "
Dec 8th 2021
EXTRACT: "This puts US Democrats in a difficult position. What is a political party to do when the other main party has been taken over by self-appointed holy warriors? To treat them as a loyal opposition worthy of engagement in a spirit of compromise and respect becomes almost impossible. Democrats like Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama, and Joe Biden have sometimes been criticized by their own supporters for not fighting dirty and giving Republican fanatics a dose of their own foul medicine.  That would be a mistake. All legal means should be used to stop extremists from wrecking democratic institutions, but those institutions won’t survive if all parties turn politics into a matter of life and death. In a quasi-religious war, the far right will almost certainly win; they have more fanatics and, in the US, many more guns."