May 24th 2019

Iran’s Leader, Khamenei, Blasts President Rouhani for Negotiating Nuclear deal with US

by Juan Cole

Juan Cole is the Richard P. Mitchell Professor of History and the director of the Center for South Asian Studies at the University of Michigan. His latest book, Engaging the Muslim World, is just out in a revised paperback edition from Palgrave Macmillan. He runs the Informed Commentwebsite.

 

Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) – The private Tasnim news agency reports from Iran that in a speech to thousands of university students, Iran’s clerical leader Ali Khamenei made an unusual and extraordinary criticism of president Hassan Rouhani and foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif over their handling of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or deal on limiting Iran’s nuclear enrichment program.

A student asked him about his views of the JCPOA. Khamenei pointed out that he had written a letter during the negotiations with the permanent members of the UN Security Council laying out the requirements of any deal. He said that the final JCPOA had not met those requirements, but that as a spiritual leader he was reluctant to intervene directly in the executive branch of government (headed by the elected president, Hassan Rouhani, now in his second term. It is Rouhani who appointed foreign minister Zarif–though with parliamentary approval and implicitly that of Khamenei.)

Iran’s distinctive form of government has four branches, not the three mentioned in Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws. In addition to the executive, the legislative and judicial branches, there is a clerical branch that in some ways oversees all three. The clerical Leader (who is referred to in Persian as “exalted,” not “supreme”) is commander in chief of the armed forces and controls the intelligence agency. He can dismiss the president and prorogue parliament. He can veto legislation. He can close newspapers. In some ways, he has ultimate review powers analogous to those of the US Supreme Court. But despite the vast range of his power, the clerical Leader seldom actually attempts to micromanage governance.

Khamenei appears to be attempting to avoid responsibility for the nuclear deal, putting it entire on Rouhani’s shoulders. It has not in fact traditionally been the case that he declined to involve himself in the affairs of the executive, and all nuclear negotiations have required his go-ahead, though it is probably true that the JCPOA was only inked in summer 2015 because Khamenei did not attempt to micro-manage the negotiations.

Khamenei is also, by criticizing pragmatic centrists, attempting to pave the way for hard liners to win the next presidential and parliamentary elections.

Khamenei said Wednesday that he feels it is inappropriate for the Leader to intervene in the executive unless it is on an issue that affects the Islamic Revolution and its movement.

He said that he never had much faith in the nuclear deal, given the precise shape it took, and had repeatedly communicated his reservations to president Rouhani and foreign minister Zarif.

Khamenei was known to have distrusted the United States and doubted its ability to negotiate with Iran in good faith. The Obama administration got Iran to mothball 80% of its nuclear enrichment program and give up on programs that gave Iran “latency” or the technical ability to construct a nuclear bomb if it felt existentially in danger from a Bush-style invasion. In return for essentially giving up a pillar of its security, Iran was to receive relief from US and UN economic sanctions and begin to be able to integrate into the international system.

Despite Iran’s full compliance with its obligations, in 2017 Trump breached the 2015 treaty with Iran and slapped the most severe economic sanctions on Iran that have been applied to any country in history.

In recent weeks the Trump administration has declared the Iranian national guard, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, a terrorist organization and engaged in provocative military moves in an apparent attempt to provoke Iran into a militant response, thus providing Trump’s warmongers with a pretext for military action against Iran.

Iran got taken for a ride, having destroyed its stockpiles of low enriched uranium up to 19.75%, having mothballed its heavy water nuclear generator, having given up all but 6000 centrifuges, having accepted extensive and intrusive UN inspections– it not only got nothing in return but actually had more severe sanctions placed on it in the aftermath.

Rouhani and Zarif, the architects of the nuclear deal within Iran, now look like fools for trusting the US to live up to its side of the bargain. Severe sanctions are hurting the Iranian people, who had been expecting a windfall from the nuclear deal instead. Iran’s hard liners, who never wanted the nuclear deal, have been emboldened.

Khamenei sees the writing on the wall and knows that lightning is striking all around Rouhani, and so is stepping away.

Khamenei’s distrust of Washington is rooted in a long history of imperialism and oppression. The US overthrew the elected Iranian government in 1953 and placed the dictatorial Mohammad Reza Pahlavi on the throne, in part to control oil prices during the Cold War, and so as to use Iran as a pawn in its struggle against the Soviet Union. The 1979 revolution aimed at liberating Iran from the grasp of Washington and its proxy, the shah. In the 1980s the US supported the aggressor, Saddam Hussein of Iraq, in his brutal war on Iran, and the US de facto supported the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon, branding the Hizbullah “terrorists” for fighting to get the Israeli occupiers back out of their country. The US has also given Israel massive aid, allowing it to blockade Gaza and gradually to steal vast swathes of the Palestinian West Bank from the people who have lived there for millennia. From Iran’s point of view, US policy in the region has been about the worst thing that has happened to the Middle East since the Mongol invasions, and Khamenei was not expecting good news from the White House.

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Feb 18th 2020
EXTRACT: "Beyond the usual economic and policy risks that most financial analysts worry about, a number of potentially seismic white swans are visible on the horizon this year. Any of them could trigger severe economic, financial, political, and geopolitical disturbances unlike anything since the 2008 crisis."
Feb 18th 2020
Extract: "In late 2019, Zogby Research Services (ZRS) once again had the opportunity to poll public opinion across the Middle East and North Africa about many of these issues that are of such critical concern to the region and its peoples..............One of the more intriguing results in our 2019 survey were the changes in Arab views toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Most Arabs still blame the US and Israel for the absence of peace and have little confidence that the conflict can be resolved in the near future. Maybe as a result of this despair, this issue now ranks low as an Arab priority. Also noteworthy is the fact that majorities in most Arab countries now say that normalization with Israel, which they acknowledge is already happening, may be a good thing. This development shouldn’t be overstated, however, since there is still no love for Israel. It appears, from our survey, to be born of frustration, weariness with Palestinians being victims of war, and the possibility that normalization might bring some economic benefits and could give Arabs leverage to press Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians."
Feb 15th 2020
EXTRACT: "Global dissatisfaction with democracy has increased over the past 25 years, according to our recent report. Drawing upon the HUMAN Surveys project, the report covered 154 countries, with 77 countries covered continuously for the period from 1995 to 2020. These samples were possible thanks to the combination of data from over 25 sources, 3,500 national surveys, and 4 million respondents. Not surprisingly, the gloomy headline finding – rising democratic dissatisfaction – attracted the most attention. Less widely discussed, however, is the “good news” – that a small sample of countries has bucked the trend, and have record high levels of satisfaction with their democracies."
Feb 14th 2020
EXTRACT: "This is how dictatorships begin. As the US prepares for its next presidential election in November, it is every citizen’s responsibility rationally to examine Trump’s dictatorial impulses, which reelection would only reinforce. It is not safe to assume that he won’t go too far, or that he is too much of a “mediocrity” – as Leon Trotsky called Stalin (an assessment with which many Bolsheviks agreed) – to transform his country......Vladimir Lenin, himself a ruthless Bolshevik, wrote in 1922 that, “Stalin concentrated in his hands enormous power, which he won’t be able to use responsibly,” owing to traits like rudeness, intolerance, and capriciousness. Trump has all of them in spades. The more power he concentrates in his own hands, the dimmer the long-term outlook for American democracy becomes. His reelection could mean lights out."
Feb 9th 2020
EXTRACT: "Does this mean that the dream of European unity is over? Does the exodus of a member state obliterate the vision of Victor Hugo and Václav Havel? Does Europe now fit the description of what the great American president Abraham Lincoln called a house divided against itself? Not necessarily. History is more imaginative than we are. The EU still has the option of keeping Britain close in heart and mind. We can still benefit from our absent partner, by resurrecting the partnership through our actions."
Feb 7th 2020
EXTRACT: "There, no formal change from a republican system to an autocratic system ever occurred. Rather, there was an erosion of the republican institutions, a steady creep over decades of authoritarian decision-making, and the consolidation of power within one individual – all with the name “Republic” preserved.........Will the GOP-led Senate’s endorsement of this defense clear a path for more of the manifestations – and consequences – of authoritarianism? The case of the Roman Republic’s rapid slippage into an autocratic regime masquerading as a republic shows how easily that transformation can occur."
Feb 7th 2020
EXTRACT: "So all that is why Cramer is talking about the death knell of petroleum stocks. We probably agree on almost nothing else, but when people are right, you have to give them credit. He is right."
Feb 3rd 2020
EXTRACT: "........as the citizens of the remaining 27 states have observed the destabilising impact that the referendum decision has had on British politics, they have been inoculated against the desire to secede from the EU. Outside the UK, national-populist parties have moderated their anti-EU rhetoric and nowadays profess to want to change the EU from within instead of destroying it."
Feb 2nd 2020
EXTRACT: "Senators will soon decide whether to dismiss the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump without hearing any witnesses. In making this decision, I believe they should consider words spoken at the Constitutional Convention, when the Founders decided that an impeachment process was needed to provide a “regular examination,” to quote Benjamin Franklin. A critical debate took place on July 20, 1787, which resulted in adding the impeachment clause to the U.S. Constitution. Franklin, the oldest and probably wisest delegate at the Constitutional Convention, said that when the president falls under suspicion, a “regular and peaceable inquiry” is needed."
Feb 1st 2020
EXTRACT: "Britain will be celebrating its glorious independence from the complications of international cooperation at a time when the intellectual, political, and economic hostility between China’s communist leadership and liberal democracies is becoming ever clearer. If liberal democracy is to survive, it must stand up for itself. And we should be under no illusion: open societies under the rule of law, from the Americas to Europe, Africa, and Asia, are in China’s hostile sights. The West should not aim to encircle or pen in China. But liberal democracies cannot allow it to distort international norms in its own favor."
Jan 29th 2020
EXTRACT: "Switzerland and Denmark have gone furthest into negative territory, both offering unprecedentedly low rates of -0.75%. The Swiss National Bank, which has kept its rate at this level since 2015, signalled recently that it intends to stick with this experiment and is not ruling out going even more negative. It has said that negative rates were boosting the economy and that the country’s fundamentals were not being significantly affected."
Jan 28th 2020
EXTRACT: "Electricity will dominate the future global energy system. Currently, it accounts for only 20% of final energy demand,......Without assuming any fundamental technological breakthroughs, we could certainly build by 2050 a global economy in which electricity met 65-70% of final energy demand,....."
Jan 27th 2020
EXTRACT: "With the world economy operating dangerously close to stall speed, the confluence of ever-present shocks and a sharply diminished trade cushion raises serious questions about financial markets’ increasingly optimistic view of global economic prospects."
Jan 26th 2020
EXTRACT: "Gibson’s diagnosis is supported by international attitude surveys. One found that most Americans rarely think about the future and only a few think about the distant future. When they are forced to think about it, they don’t like what they see. Another poll by the Pew Research Centre found that 44% of Americans were pessimistic about what lies ahead. But pessimism about the future isn’t just limited to the US. One international poll of over 400,000 people from 26 countries found that people in developed countries tended to think that the lives of today’s children will be worse than their own. And a 2015 international survey by YouGov found that people in developed countries were particularly pessimistic. For instance, only 4% of people in Britain thought things were improving. This contrasted with 41% of Chinese people who thought things were getting better."
Jan 24th 2020
EXTRACT: "........while over 80% of the ECB scheme buys government and other public sector bonds, a huge chunk still goes into corporate bonds and other assets. At the time of writing, the ECB holds €263 billion worth of corporate bonds – a very significant amount in relation to individual firms and the sectors in question. According to the ECB, 29% of these bonds were issued by French firms, 25% by German firms and 11% each by Spanish and Italian firms. As at September 2017, the sectors they came from included utilities (16%), infrastructure (12%), automotive (10%) and energy (7%)."
Jan 17th 2020
EXTRACT: "Thanks to cutting-edge digital technology, cars are increasingly like “smartphones on wheels”, so manufacturers need to have access to the latest patented 4G and 5G technologies essential to navigation and communications. But often the companies that hold the patents are reluctant to license them because manufacturers will not accept the high fees involved, which leads to patent disputes and licensing rows."
Jan 13th 2020
EXTRACT: "Recent polling from Pew Research demonstrates how the public’s attitudes toward the US and President Trump have witnessed sharp declines in many nations across the world. In Europe, the Americas, and the Middle East favorable attitudes toward the US went from lows during the years of George W. Bush’s presidency to highs in the early Obama years to lows, once again, in the Trump era. And in our Zogby Research Services (ZRS) polling we found, with a few exceptions, much the same trajectory across the Middle East."
Jan 13th 2020
EXTRACT: "In the absence of a declaration of war against Iran, the killing of a foreign official – by a drone strike on Iraqi territory – was possibly illegal. But such niceties do not perturb Trump. The evidence is that Trump’s decision was taken without consideration of the possible consequences. The national security system established under Dwight D. Eisenhower, designed to prevent such reckless measures, is broken to non-existent, with ever-greater power placed in the hands of the president. If that president is unstable, the entire world has a very serious problem."
Jan 9th 2020
EXTRACT: "It is possible that Trump’s reverential base won’t be sufficient to keep him in the White House past 2020. But such ardent faith is hard to oppose with rational plans to fix this or that problem. That is why it is so unsettling to hear people at the top of the US government speak about politics in terms that rightly belong in church. They are challenging the founding principles of the American Republic, and they might actually win as a result."