Apr 5th 2011

Jim Messina-- Perfect Choice to be Obama Campaign Manager

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

I first got to know Jim Messina right after the Democratic disaster in 2004. Bush had been re-elected - along with a Republican Congress. The centerpiece of their program for a second term was the privatization of Social Security - their plan to trade Social Security's guaranteed benefits for a risky investment scheme that allowed Wall Street to get its hands on the Social Security Trust Fund.

Messina was Senate Finance Chair Max Baucus' Chief of Staff. I was working with a group of unions and other progressive organizations to set up a campaign to stop the privatization of Social Security.

With Messina's help, the coalition recruited Paul Tewes to manage that campaign. Tewes would go on several years later to run the most extraordinary grassroots effort in the history of American politics - managing the Obama victory in the Iowa caucuses that made him a contender for the Presidency. Brad Woodhouse - who is now Communications Director at the DNC - became Communications Director of the Social Security campaign. I became Field Director.

Through the next nine months, the coalition - that became Americans United to Protect Social Security - ran a major grassroots effort that was successful at stopping privatization dead in its tracks.

I can tell you for certain that much of the credit for the campaign's success went to Jim Messina.

Messina worked the Senate - helping to hold wayward members in line - and devised strategy with his boss and the Democratic Leadership. But there was never a day that he didn't focus on what he said really mattered: that out in the Districts people were mobilizing to support Social Security.

Jim has always been absolutely committed to the view that Progressives win through a grassroots movement - through people taking action. And he understands that you engage people by making them simultaneously feel that they are part of something bigger - something historic - and at the same time they can each make a personal contribution that really matters to the movement's success.

When Messina left Baucus to join the Obama Campaign as Chief of Staff, those of us who had worked with him were thrilled. Messina was a committed Progressive who started out in politics as a grassroots organizer in Montana. He has the management skill of a top CEO coupled with boatloads of political savvy.

And there was one other quality that made him the perfect choice for Campaign Chief of Staff then - and Campaign Manager now:

From my personal experience working with Messina over the last six years, I can tell you firsthand that he is completely committed to progressive values. But he doesn't believe that is good enough. Messina believes that you have to put those values into practice - that you have to convert them into public policy. Messina is passionate about winning.

I haven't always agreed with every tactical choice of the Obama Administration - or with Messina's approach to every issue. He'd be the first to tell you that I am regularly hounding him with suggestions on how he - or the Administration - should do something, or not do something.

But I have no doubt whatsoever that Messina is absolutely devoted to the fulfillment of the Progressive vision that is at the heart of what is special about America. And more times than not he is successful at making progress happen.

Messina is sometimes criticized by Progressives for his management of the health care battle. Progressives like myself believe strongly that the Affordable Care Act would be better if it had included a Public Option. So, by the way, does Messina.

I personally would have preferred if the White House would have fought more forcefully for the Public Option.

But having been deeply involved in the health care battle working with Americans United for Change and Health Care for America Now (HCAN), I'm not sure we could have gotten a Public Option no matter what the President did or did not do. The Senate Filibuster, the health insurance lobby, and Senator Lieberman were our chief obstacles. The Administration and Senate leadership had negotiated a deal with Progressive Senators to include a Medicare buy-in for people from 55 to 65 years of age -- which would have been a huge advance. But then the insurance industry told Lieberman - who had favored the plan - to drop it. And that was that.

I think Messina and others, like David Axelrod, would agree that there were mistakes made in the campaign. One of those was allowing the battle to go on for so long - indulging Senator Baucus' attempt to get bi-partisan compromise over so many months that it amplified our opponent's ability to dominate the air waves. By the way, I don't know that Messina could have personally done a lot more to get Baucus off of the bi-partisan program more quickly - notwithstanding their close relationship -- though I suspect he tried. The White House was being told that the bill had to go through the committee process in order to keep sixty votes. Getting Baucus to move that process more quickly would have required a major confrontation, that at the time the White House apparently did not think would be productive. In retrospect
Messina may view it differently, I don't know.

Another problem was not shifting soon enough to framing the battle as a fight with the insurance industry - a message frame that ultimately allowed us to win. But the decision for the Administration not to use the insurance frame early was not made to "coddle" the industry. It was made to keep their money off the airwaves as long as possible. I think there is now general acknowledgement that the campaign would have been better off moving to the insurance frame earlier.

But all of that being as it may, the fact is that Obama - and Jim Messina - won a major reform in the health system that others had tried to win for almost 100 years and failed to achieve.
After Scott Brown's victory in the Massachusetts special Senate election in January 2010, there were those who believed the health care fight was lost. Messina led the battle that helped overcome the Massachusetts disaster that cost Democrats a 60-vote margin in the Senate. Nancy Pelosi's iron-willed leadership, the President's determination, and Harry Reid's skill - were all necessary ingredients for the victory. But without Jim Messina, I don't believe that health care reform would be the law of the land.

Health insurance reform wasn't tough to pass because it was so complicated. It was tough to pass because it gored the oxen of major vested interests that weren't just going to roll over and play dead. Messina was the general who beat those forces in a major war.
Jim has also been criticized by some in the gay rights community for not moving forcefully enough to eliminate Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT). But in the end, his strategy - of getting buy-in from the Defense Department and leading Generals - worked. It got the votes the President needed in Congress to pass the bill.

And in case you mistakenly believe Messina is just a hard-bitten political operative and not a true-believer, here's what Joe Solmonese of the Human Rights Campaign Fund said about the day that Don't Ask, Don't Tell was repealed, in a recent article in
The Nation:

Solmonese said that Messina was "unquestionably one of the great unsung heroes of DADT repeal." Solmonese then described how he stood side by side with Messina on the Senate floor as the bill cleared the body on December 18. When the sixtieth vote came in, Solmonese said, Messina began to cry.

The same thing happened at a Common Purpose meeting where all present toasted Messina and each other for passing health care reform - after a century of trying.
Messina represented the Administration week after week at Common Purpose - an organization that was the first effort of its kind to assure systematic contact between the leadership of Progressive organizations and a Democratic president.

Others may differ. I think they that those meetings have proved invaluable, assuring passage of progressive initiatives like the health care law, financial reform, repeal of DADT, the economic stimulus bill that saved the economy from a depression, and the critical first Obama budget.

My understanding is that the campaign plan for 2012 is still in formation. But one critical element is clear. The campaign will be even more reliant than it was in 2008 on its grass roots ground game. Messina is devoted to the central values of the Obama campaign culture: respect, empowerment, accountability and inspiration.

His management style is to treat the people who are part of his organization with respect; empower them to do their jobs; and hold everyone in the organization accountable for meeting concrete goals. And he understands that people excel when they are inspired - when they feel that they are part of something historic, and are called upon to contribute personally to make that historic goal a reality.

Those are the principles that gave the 2008 Obama campaign the most successful field operation in the history of American politics. Messina intends to build on that success. That's why he's chosen 2008 alums Mitch Stewart and Jeremy Bird to manage the field operation in 2012.

If you talk to the people who've worked for Jim over the years, you find nothing but respect and admiration for his talent and for the way he treats the people who work for him.
Obama's 2008 field organizers revered Campaign Manager David Plouffe. I predict the same will be true of Jim Messina.

In President Obama's first two years the Progressive forces took enormous amounts of new ground. We didn't win everything. One of the most heartbreaking defeats was the failure to pass Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Another was the defeat of energy legislation. But we were definitely back on the offensive after a long period in a defensive crouch.
None of those victories would have happened without a massive battle. Last November, Wall Street, the Insurance Industry, the Big Banks and the Chamber of Commerce regrouped and the empire struck back. Change isn't easy. If it were, it would have happened a long time ago.
Now we have to defend our gains and regroup for a Progressive counter-offensive in 2012 - one that will allow us to make this period in our history a real "big change" moment like the New Deal or the 1960's.

The stakes are enormous. If we are successful at taking back the House, holding onto the Senate and re-electing the President we can realize the promise that millions felt as we watched Barack Obama take the oath as President just over two years ago. If we are not successful, we could fall back into the political dark ages.

In a battle like that, I can't think of anyone I would rather have as Commanding General more than Jim Messina.

Robert Creamer's the book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win" is available on Amazon.com. 

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Nov 30th 2021
EXTRACT: "So it could well be that, despite the faster spread of the infection, its ultimate health, social and economic impact proves negligible. We simply do not know at this point. But detecting more uncertainty than before, financial markets have reacted with panic. For example, the S&P500 tumbled 2.3% on Friday November 26 only to rise 1.1% on Monday November 29. Most markets gave up between 2% and 4%, which is a pretty substantial one-day fall."
Nov 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "Momentous changes are casting a long shadow on China. The country’s political system will soon undergo a profound reform, pending final approval (a quasi-formality) at next year’s congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC). President Xi Jinping, the Party chairman and the “navigator” of the country, has decided on a new course, abandoning the principle of collective leadership. Xi is leading China away from the path taken by Deng Xiaoping after the terror of the Cultural Revolution, and back toward a system of absolute rule by one person without term limits, as under Mao Zedong."
Nov 25th 2021
EXTRACTS: "”The biggest disappointment in Glasgow was the last-minute watering down of the proposed (and widely supported) agreement to “phase out” the use of coal in energy production. With India providing political cover for China in vetoing this language, the final conference proposal was to “phase down” coal”. ---- “China accounts for more than half of the world’s coal consumption, and has the largest amount of coal-fired generating capacity under construction. Pressed about why his country would not do more in Glasgow to help save the planet, China’s chief negotiator pointed to the commitments in the Communist Party of China’s current Five-Year Plan. So, our future now depends on the CPC’s program. The tragedy for the world is that the Party cannot be phased down, much less phased out, despite the fact that it is a huge threat to the future of all of us.” ------ “To save the planet, robust democratic leadership must be phased up – not phased down, let alone phased out. Rather than merely keeping our fingers crossed and hoping for the best, we should start by calling out the appalling behavior of dictatorships such as China and Russia.”
Nov 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "The transitory inflation debate in the United States is over. The upsurge in US inflation has turned into something far worse than the Federal Reserve expected. Perpetually optimistic financial markets are taking this largely in stride. The Fed is widely presumed to have both the wisdom and the firepower to keep underlying inflation in check. That remains to be seen."
Nov 14th 2021
EXTRACT: "S&P projects that companies are planning to install 44 gigawatts of new solar in 2022. The year 2020, despite the onset of the pandemic, saw a record-breaking 19 gigawatts of new solar capacity installed in the U.S. So given the bids out there already, it appears that in 2022 solar installers will more than double their best year ever so far. The U.S. currently has 100 gigawatts of solar electricity-generating capacity, so in just one year we are poised to add nearly 50% of our current total. A gigawatt of power can provide electricity to about 750,000 homes. So the 44 new gigawatts we’ll put in next year have a nameplate capacity that would under ideal conditions allow them to power 33 million homes." ----- "Not only is there a lot of good news on the green energy front but there is good news in the bad news for fossil fuels. S&P finds that coal plants are being retired way before the utilities had expected. Some 29 gigawatts of coal retirements are expected from 2020 through 2025. "
Nov 3rd 2021
EXTRACT: "Zemmour’s way of thinking stems from a tradition going back to the French Revolution of 1789. Catholic conservatives and right-wing intellectuals, who hated the secular republic that emerged from the revolution, have long fulminated against liberals, cosmopolitans, immigrants, and other enemies of their idea of a society based on ethnic purity, obedience to the church, and family values. They were almost invariably anti-Semitic. When Jewish army Captain Alfred Dreyfus was falsely accused of betraying his country in the notorious scandal of the 1890s, they were on the side of Dreyfus’s accusers. ---- Germany’s invasion of France in 1940 gave reactionaries of this kind the chance to form a French puppet-government in Vichy. Zemmour has had kind things to say about the Vichy regime. He also has expressed some doubt about the innocence of Dreyfus. ---- None of these views would be surprising if they came from a far-right agitator like Jean-Marie Le Pen. But Zemmour is the son of Sephardic Jewish immigrants from Algeria who lived among the Muslim Berbers."
Oct 27th 2021
EXTRACT: "performed strongly in last month’s parliamentary and regional elections. Officially, Communist Party candidates took 18.9% of the popular vote for the State Duma (parliament), compared to nearly 49.8% for the Kremlin’s United Russia party. But the Communists refused to recognize the results, insisting that the vote was rigged. And, indeed, some experts estimate that they should have gotten around 30% of the vote, with United Russia taking about 35%."
Oct 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Powell was charismatic in the true sense of the term. Nowadays, this description is too often used to indicate an ability to attract supporters or generate celebrity interest. Internet lists of those who are regarded as charismatic include characters as varied as Adolf Hitler, Bono, Donald Trump, George Clooney, and Rihanna. But the ancient Greeks and Saint Paul used “charisma” to describe values-based leadership infused with a charm capable of inspiring devotion. The Greeks believed that this quality was a gift of grace, while Christian theology regarded it as a power given by the Holy Spirit."
Oct 17th 2021
EXTRACTS: "But property-sector woes are not the only economic danger China faces in 2021-22. The Chinese government’s mounting crackdown on the country’s burgeoning tech sector may pose an even greater threat." ---- "According to a recent study by McKinsey & Company, the share of Chinese urban employment supported by private enterprises more than quadrupled between 1995 and 2018, from just 18% to 87%. The share of exports generated by the private sector more than doubled over the same period, from 34% to 88%. And private-sector fixed-asset investment jumped from 42% to 65% of the total. The message in the data is clear: clamping down on the private sector and threatening innovators is not the way to ensure sustained rapid growth. Chinese entrepreneurs can read the writing on the wall. They understand that their political and regulatory room to maneuver is shrinking, and that the balance has shifted in favor of state-owned firms and public officials. And they understand that this uneasy atmosphere is likely to persist."
Oct 16th 2021
EXTRACT: "We designed a programme that incorporated data from over 300 million buildings and analysed 130 million km² of land – almost the entire land surface area of the planet. This estimated how much energy could be produced from the 0.2 million km² of rooftops present on that land, an area roughly the same size as the UK."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "Britain in the 1950s was wedded to the US, acting as a partner rather than leading the charge. Now, while the UK continues to support the US, the influence it has seems negligible. While it may bring comfort to the UK to feel it is a partner to a superpower, being its stooge or subordinate is an unpleasant place to be, no matter how much you tell yourself it values your opinion."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "That was then. Now, the Chinese government has doubled down, with President Xi Jinping throwing the full force of his power into a “common prosperity” campaign aimed at addressing inequalities of income and wealth. Moreover, the regulatory net has been broadened, not just to ban cryptocurrencies, but also to become an instrument of social engineering, with the government adding e-cigarettes, business drinking, and celebrity fan culture to its ever-lengthening list of bad social habits. All this only compounds the concerns I raised two months ago. The new dual thrust of Chinese policy – redistribution plus re-regulation – strikes at the heart of the market-based “reform and opening up” that have underpinned China’s growth miracle since the days of Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s. It will subdue the entrepreneurial activity that has been so important in powering China’s dynamic private sector, with lasting consequences for the next, innovations-driven, phase of Chinese economic development. Without animal spirits, the case for indigenous innovation is in tatters."
Oct 5th 2021
EXTRACT: "Wartime nostalgia plays an important part in Britain’s instinctive fondness for the special relationship. Like former Prime Minister Tony Blair in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some British politicians might believe that the United Kingdom is the only European country with serious armed forces and the political will to use them. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, like Blair before him, seems to fancy himself a modern-day Churchill. Unfortunately (or not), Britain’s military power is insignificant compared to what Churchill could command in 1944. Wartime nostalgia has drawn Britain into several foolish American wars, which other European countries were wise to avoid."
Sep 24th 2021
EXTRACTS: "We have found that 47 million American adults – nearly 1 in 5 – agree with the statement that “the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.” Of those, 21 million also agree that “use of force is justified to restore Donald J. Trump to the presidency.” Our survey found that many of these 21 million people with insurrectionist sentiments have the capacity for violent mobilization. At least 7 million of them already own a gun, and at least 3 million have served in the U.S. military and so have lethal skills. Of those 21 million, 6 million said they supported right-wing militias and extremist groups, and 1 million said they are themselves or personally know a member of such a group, including the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys." ----- "..... the Jan. 6 insurrection represents a far more mainstream movement than earlier instances of right-wing extremism across the country. Those events, mostly limited to white supremacist and militia groups, saw more than 100 individuals arrested from 2015 to 2020. But just 14% of those arrested for their actions on Jan. 6 are members of those groups. More than half are business owners or middle-aged white-collar professionals, and only 7% are unemployed."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "That long path, though, has from the start had within it one fundamental flaw. If we are to make sense of wider global trends in insecurity, we have to recognise that in all the analysis around the 9/11 anniversary there lies the belief that the main security concern must be with an extreme version of Islam. It may seem a reasonable mistake, given the impact of the wars, but it still misses the point. The war on terror is better seen as one part of a global trend which goes well beyond a single religious tradition – a slow but steady move towards revolts from the margins."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACTS: "Is it not extraordinary that in a country that claims to be as enlightened and advanced as ours, the combined wealth of three individuals – Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and investor Warren Buffett – exceeds the total wealth of the bottom half of Americans? One has to return to the days of the pharaohs of Egypt to find a parallel to the extreme wealth inequality that we see in in America today." ...... "The top tax rate remained above 90 percent through the 1950s and did not dip below 70 percent until 1981. At no point during the decades that saw America’s greatest economic growth did the tax on the wealthy drop below 70 percent. Today it is somewhere around 37 percent. President Biden’s American Families Plan would increase the top tax rate to 39.6 percent – a fairly modest alteration, albeit in the right direction. It is true that there was a time when the top marginal tax was even lower than it is today: in the years leading up to the Great Depression it hovered around 25 percent."
Sep 7th 2021
EXTRACT: "But Biden can’t be blamed for the rise of the Taliban, or the fragile state of a country that has seen far too many wars and invasions. The US should not have been there in the first place, but that is a lesson that great powers never seem to learn."
Sep 4th 2021
EXTRACT: "The world is only starting to grapple with how profound the artificial-intelligence revolution will be. AI technologies will create waves of progress in critical infrastructure, commerce, transportation, health, education, financial markets, food production, and environmental sustainability. Successful adoption of AI will drive economies, reshape societies, and determine which countries set the rules for the coming century." ----- "AI will reorganize the world and change the course of human history. The democratic world must lead that process."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Although the Fed is considering tapering its quantitative easing (QE), it will likely remain dovish and behind the curve overall. Like most central banks, it has been lured into a “debt trap” by the surge in private and public liabilities (as a share of GDP) in recent years. Even if inflation stays higher than targeted, exiting QE too soon could cause bond, credit, and stock markets to crash. That would subject the economy to a hard landing, potentially forcing the Fed to reverse itself and resume QE." ---- "After all, that is what happened between the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, following the Fed’s previous attempt to raise rates and roll back QE."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Today’s economic challenges are certainly solvable, and there is no reason why inflation should have to spike."