Aug 22nd 2012

Romney Fails When it comes to “The Vision Thing”

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

After he lost the 1992 Presidential election to Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush reportedly confided that one of his major political problems was “the vision thing.” 
 
The first President Bush did not appear to voters to have a sense of where he wanted to take the country.  At every level of government, and especially President, voters want leaders with vision. And vision is just one more leadership quality that is noticeably absent in Mitt Romney – unless, of course, what you want is “rear view vision.”
 
In the four and a half decades I have consulted or managed election campaigns, one thing has become indisputably clear.  Elections are not fundamentally decided by debates about issues, or economic policies, or ideologies.  Voters choose between candidates – between living, breathing human beings.  And they make those judgments in the same way we make judgments about whom we want as a boss, or a friend or a spouse.  Voters evaluate a series of character qualities and decide who they want to be their leaders.
 
Don’t get me wrong. The economic situation, positions on issues and policies and ideologies definitely affect voter evaluation of these candidate leadership qualities.  These questions help us decide who we believe is on our side, who is an effective leader, who is committed to principle rather than simply his or her own success.  These are critical questions for voters.  But in making their decisions, voters – and especially low-information swing voters – don’t generally make detailed analyses of policy positions – or parse candidate statements.  They make their decisions based on judgments as to which candidate possesses these leadership qualities, and others that are often even more intuitive. Into the decision mix go qualities like who respects us, who has integrity, who is self-confident, who is likeable and makes an emotional connection, who inspires us – and who has a sense of vision.
 
In this fall’s election these more intuitive factors will play an especially important role in the voting decisions of the historically low number of remaining swing voters. Last week, New York Times reporter Rebecca Berg profiled these swing voters – noting that many are low-information voters who rarely follow politics.  The Times story describes Curtis Napier, a 52-year-old, swing voter from Ohio who says he does not yet have enough information to decide what to do in November.
 
“Between working full time for a fabrication company and attending school part time for a degree in manufacturing engineering, he said consideration of the presidential election was an afterthought,” wrote Berg.  
 
“In 2008, Mr. Napier drew much of his information from the presidential debates, in which he says, ‘McCain seemed to be distracted most of the time when he talked, and Obama seemed to be an educated man who has focus.’”
 
In the end, swing voters will make an intuitive judgment about which of the two Presidential candidates they want to trust as their leader.
 
Why do voters care about vision? The great baseball player Yogi Berra used to say: “If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.”  Voters want leaders who know where they are taking us in the same way that you want a pilot who knows how to get to the correct airport.
 
And especially when it comes to Presidents, voters want leaders who give them a sense that they understand the forces of history and change that will shape the future they are leading us into – the same way they want pilots who know what kind of weather lies ahead.
 
ohn F. Kennedy’s 1960 campaign centered around his vision for the future.  Kennedy’s campaign themes: “A Time for Greatness” and “Leadership for the 60’s,” and “Getting America Moving Again” gave voters a sense that he had a clear vision for America’s future.
 
In 1996, Clinton’s attacks on Bob Dole for his lack of vision were devastating.  In one commercial the Clinton campaign ran clips of Dole recounting how he had opposed Medicare, how he opposed the Department of Education and uttering his famous quote: “I’m not sure what everyone is looking for in a candidate for President.  Maybe we shouldn’t have one at all, leave it vacant.  But there’s going to be one, every country ought to have one, so we’re out here campaigning.”
 
The spot concluded: “No Vision: Wrong in the Past, Wrong in the Future.”
 
Whether it involves the future of the middle class, or the earth’s environment, or national security, Mitt Romney is visionless.
 
Then again, what would you expect from a guy who spent his career focused only on the next quarter’s bottom line?
 
Romney seems clueless when it comes to the major forces that have affected the economic prospects of everyday Americans.   He apparently never noticed that while per capita economic output (GDP) – and per capita productivity – have both steadily risen for the last twenty years, the incomes of everyday Americans have remained stagnant. 
 
There is only one way to account for this phenomena: a tiny sliver of the population has siphoned off the fruits of that increased productivity for themselves.  This is exactly what the economic data tells us is true. And that is what has left the middle class, and those who aspire to it, without the money in their pockets to buy the increasing volume of goods and services that have been generated by that increased productivity.  The resulting stagnation, coupled with an orgy of reckless speculation on Wall Street, sent us tumbling off the worst economic cliff in 60 years. 
 
But Romney’s prescription to improve the economy is to go back to exactly the same failed Bush era policies that lead to this disaster. Romney’s prescription: shower the top 2% with more tax breaks and they will allow some of that shower to trickle down to everyday people.  And, of course, Romney wants to allow Wall Street to run wild. We tried that, just four short years ago.  It didn’t work then, it won’t work now. 
 
That is precisely why the Obama campaign has labeled the Romney-Ryan ticket the “Go Back Team.” 
 
But Romney and his new running mate Paul Ryan have no intention of stopping with the Bush era: they want to return America to the Gilded Age.  They would eliminate Medicare and replace it with a “voucher” program, privatize Social Security (how would that have worked during the stock market collapse that cost pensioners 40% of their savings?), eliminate unions, repeal labor protections, and weaken safety protections for workers.
 
Romney and Ryan opposed laws to assure that women receive equal pay.  They would strip women of their right to choose and eliminate government support for contraceptives.
 
Things are just as bad when it comes to America’s relations with other countries.  Bad enough that Romney has appointed a foreign policy team that includes many of the Neo Cons who were architects of the disastrous Iraq War that cost thousands of American their lives, cost a trillion dollars of our treasure, probably caused the deaths of a million Iraqis, and besmirched America’s reputation worldwide.

But he doesn’t want to stop with the age of Neo Cons either. Romney wants to hop into a time machine and return to the Cold War.  He has made clear that Russia is America’s “chief geo-political foe.” Maybe it’s time for someone to tell Mitt that the Soviet Union collapsed almost a quarter-century ago.  Next, Mitt might propose America focus on the spread of Fascism in Europe.
 
But perhaps the most glaring thing about Mitt’s lack of vision, is the lack of evidence that he has any sense whatsoever about the forces that will shape the world we will leave to our children.
 
He bull-headedly ignores the now incontrovertible scientific evidence that human behavior is causing global climate change that will completely reshape our lives.  He attacks initiatives aimed at rebuilding America’s infrastructure to 21st century standards, and supports proposals like the Ryan budget that would cut funding for education – the single most important factor that can give our kids a better life.
 
When it comes to real threats to our national security, Romney and Ryan seem positively lost.  It isn’t just that the Romney-Ryan team has less combined foreign policy experience than any other major party ticket since World War II. 
 
The security threats of the next century will emerge from the same underlying factors that has fueled human conflict for millennia: conflict over scarce resources.  But those conflicts will take place on an unprecedented global scale, in a world where we have developed nuclear weapons that could destroy all life on the planet.    And those conflicts will be fueled by major forces that visionary action could move to contain.
 
In the next fifty years, climate change and population growth could combine to cause massive food shortages.
 
The same is true of fresh water. 
 
Without renewable replacements, the depletion of fossil fuels would certainly lead to massive conflicts over shrinking energy supplies.
 
The development of cyber weapons could paralyze our network-dependent modern economy and nuclear proliferation could put these terrible weapons into the hands of terrorists.
     
Romney flat-out opposes  -- makes fun of -- investments in renewable energy sources that would begin the process of freeing us from the tyranny of Big Oil – and oil dictators – and address the problem of climate change.
 
Rather than support movements to limit the exploding growth in the world’s population, Romney actually opposes support for birth control.
 
Have you ever heard word one from Romney about protecting our natural resources, or investment in de-salinization, or strengthening the international co-operation needed to deal with cyber-security or frankly any of these critical issues? 
 
The historian Barbara Tuchman wrote the classic account of the how the world stumbled into World War I called The Guns of August.  The book concluded that the avalanche of weapons that flooded Europe in 1917 created an unstoppable logic that overcame rationality and “required” their use.  Today Russia and the United States each still aim 1,550 nuclear warheads at the other – 25 years after the end of the Cold War. 
 
And other countries continue an inexorable demand to develop their own weapons so long as the major powers maintain their stockpiles.
 
All told, the world has 25,000 nuclear weapons of all types.  Of these, 90% are in the hands of the United States and Russia, including the strategic weapons each has targeted at the other – and many tactical weapons intended for use on the battlefield or kept in storage.  The additional 2,500 are in the hands of China, Britain, France, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea. If proliferation continues, one day nuclear weapons will almost certainly once again be used to kill – potentially millions.
 
President Obama spent a great deal of political capital to pass the START II Treaty with Russia that reduced nuclear weapons to their current levels. Obama is committed to a goal of eliminating nuclear weapons entirely and ending the madness of arming ourselves with these weapons that could never be rationally used.  Mitt Romney actually opposes the steps that are obviously necessary to reduce the odds of a nuclear Armageddon.
 
Maybe someone should tell Mitt that the two percent can’t escape these problems by sequestering themselves in gated communities, or country clubs or boarding schools.
 
But one thing is certain. Whether or not he would be capable of the kind of vision necessary to comprehend the challenges of the 21st century, Mitt Romney has demonstrated that – in exactly the same way he did with Bain Capital – he believes he owes unquestioned loyalty to the bottom line of his investors.  And in the case of his run for the Presidency, those investors are the oil companies, the Wall Street banks, and the wealthy ultra-right wing donors and defense contractors whose interests are embedded in the status quo and have no interest whatsoever in having a visionary President.
 
The choice is clear.  It is no accident that the slogan of the Obama re-election campaign is “Forward.”
 
 

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Nov 30th 2021
EXTRACT: "So it could well be that, despite the faster spread of the infection, its ultimate health, social and economic impact proves negligible. We simply do not know at this point. But detecting more uncertainty than before, financial markets have reacted with panic. For example, the S&P500 tumbled 2.3% on Friday November 26 only to rise 1.1% on Monday November 29. Most markets gave up between 2% and 4%, which is a pretty substantial one-day fall."
Nov 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "Momentous changes are casting a long shadow on China. The country’s political system will soon undergo a profound reform, pending final approval (a quasi-formality) at next year’s congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC). President Xi Jinping, the Party chairman and the “navigator” of the country, has decided on a new course, abandoning the principle of collective leadership. Xi is leading China away from the path taken by Deng Xiaoping after the terror of the Cultural Revolution, and back toward a system of absolute rule by one person without term limits, as under Mao Zedong."
Nov 25th 2021
EXTRACTS: "”The biggest disappointment in Glasgow was the last-minute watering down of the proposed (and widely supported) agreement to “phase out” the use of coal in energy production. With India providing political cover for China in vetoing this language, the final conference proposal was to “phase down” coal”. ---- “China accounts for more than half of the world’s coal consumption, and has the largest amount of coal-fired generating capacity under construction. Pressed about why his country would not do more in Glasgow to help save the planet, China’s chief negotiator pointed to the commitments in the Communist Party of China’s current Five-Year Plan. So, our future now depends on the CPC’s program. The tragedy for the world is that the Party cannot be phased down, much less phased out, despite the fact that it is a huge threat to the future of all of us.” ------ “To save the planet, robust democratic leadership must be phased up – not phased down, let alone phased out. Rather than merely keeping our fingers crossed and hoping for the best, we should start by calling out the appalling behavior of dictatorships such as China and Russia.”
Nov 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "The transitory inflation debate in the United States is over. The upsurge in US inflation has turned into something far worse than the Federal Reserve expected. Perpetually optimistic financial markets are taking this largely in stride. The Fed is widely presumed to have both the wisdom and the firepower to keep underlying inflation in check. That remains to be seen."
Nov 14th 2021
EXTRACT: "S&P projects that companies are planning to install 44 gigawatts of new solar in 2022. The year 2020, despite the onset of the pandemic, saw a record-breaking 19 gigawatts of new solar capacity installed in the U.S. So given the bids out there already, it appears that in 2022 solar installers will more than double their best year ever so far. The U.S. currently has 100 gigawatts of solar electricity-generating capacity, so in just one year we are poised to add nearly 50% of our current total. A gigawatt of power can provide electricity to about 750,000 homes. So the 44 new gigawatts we’ll put in next year have a nameplate capacity that would under ideal conditions allow them to power 33 million homes." ----- "Not only is there a lot of good news on the green energy front but there is good news in the bad news for fossil fuels. S&P finds that coal plants are being retired way before the utilities had expected. Some 29 gigawatts of coal retirements are expected from 2020 through 2025. "
Nov 3rd 2021
EXTRACT: "Zemmour’s way of thinking stems from a tradition going back to the French Revolution of 1789. Catholic conservatives and right-wing intellectuals, who hated the secular republic that emerged from the revolution, have long fulminated against liberals, cosmopolitans, immigrants, and other enemies of their idea of a society based on ethnic purity, obedience to the church, and family values. They were almost invariably anti-Semitic. When Jewish army Captain Alfred Dreyfus was falsely accused of betraying his country in the notorious scandal of the 1890s, they were on the side of Dreyfus’s accusers. ---- Germany’s invasion of France in 1940 gave reactionaries of this kind the chance to form a French puppet-government in Vichy. Zemmour has had kind things to say about the Vichy regime. He also has expressed some doubt about the innocence of Dreyfus. ---- None of these views would be surprising if they came from a far-right agitator like Jean-Marie Le Pen. But Zemmour is the son of Sephardic Jewish immigrants from Algeria who lived among the Muslim Berbers."
Oct 27th 2021
EXTRACT: "performed strongly in last month’s parliamentary and regional elections. Officially, Communist Party candidates took 18.9% of the popular vote for the State Duma (parliament), compared to nearly 49.8% for the Kremlin’s United Russia party. But the Communists refused to recognize the results, insisting that the vote was rigged. And, indeed, some experts estimate that they should have gotten around 30% of the vote, with United Russia taking about 35%."
Oct 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Powell was charismatic in the true sense of the term. Nowadays, this description is too often used to indicate an ability to attract supporters or generate celebrity interest. Internet lists of those who are regarded as charismatic include characters as varied as Adolf Hitler, Bono, Donald Trump, George Clooney, and Rihanna. But the ancient Greeks and Saint Paul used “charisma” to describe values-based leadership infused with a charm capable of inspiring devotion. The Greeks believed that this quality was a gift of grace, while Christian theology regarded it as a power given by the Holy Spirit."
Oct 17th 2021
EXTRACTS: "But property-sector woes are not the only economic danger China faces in 2021-22. The Chinese government’s mounting crackdown on the country’s burgeoning tech sector may pose an even greater threat." ---- "According to a recent study by McKinsey & Company, the share of Chinese urban employment supported by private enterprises more than quadrupled between 1995 and 2018, from just 18% to 87%. The share of exports generated by the private sector more than doubled over the same period, from 34% to 88%. And private-sector fixed-asset investment jumped from 42% to 65% of the total. The message in the data is clear: clamping down on the private sector and threatening innovators is not the way to ensure sustained rapid growth. Chinese entrepreneurs can read the writing on the wall. They understand that their political and regulatory room to maneuver is shrinking, and that the balance has shifted in favor of state-owned firms and public officials. And they understand that this uneasy atmosphere is likely to persist."
Oct 16th 2021
EXTRACT: "We designed a programme that incorporated data from over 300 million buildings and analysed 130 million km² of land – almost the entire land surface area of the planet. This estimated how much energy could be produced from the 0.2 million km² of rooftops present on that land, an area roughly the same size as the UK."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "Britain in the 1950s was wedded to the US, acting as a partner rather than leading the charge. Now, while the UK continues to support the US, the influence it has seems negligible. While it may bring comfort to the UK to feel it is a partner to a superpower, being its stooge or subordinate is an unpleasant place to be, no matter how much you tell yourself it values your opinion."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "That was then. Now, the Chinese government has doubled down, with President Xi Jinping throwing the full force of his power into a “common prosperity” campaign aimed at addressing inequalities of income and wealth. Moreover, the regulatory net has been broadened, not just to ban cryptocurrencies, but also to become an instrument of social engineering, with the government adding e-cigarettes, business drinking, and celebrity fan culture to its ever-lengthening list of bad social habits. All this only compounds the concerns I raised two months ago. The new dual thrust of Chinese policy – redistribution plus re-regulation – strikes at the heart of the market-based “reform and opening up” that have underpinned China’s growth miracle since the days of Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s. It will subdue the entrepreneurial activity that has been so important in powering China’s dynamic private sector, with lasting consequences for the next, innovations-driven, phase of Chinese economic development. Without animal spirits, the case for indigenous innovation is in tatters."
Oct 5th 2021
EXTRACT: "Wartime nostalgia plays an important part in Britain’s instinctive fondness for the special relationship. Like former Prime Minister Tony Blair in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some British politicians might believe that the United Kingdom is the only European country with serious armed forces and the political will to use them. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, like Blair before him, seems to fancy himself a modern-day Churchill. Unfortunately (or not), Britain’s military power is insignificant compared to what Churchill could command in 1944. Wartime nostalgia has drawn Britain into several foolish American wars, which other European countries were wise to avoid."
Sep 24th 2021
EXTRACTS: "We have found that 47 million American adults – nearly 1 in 5 – agree with the statement that “the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.” Of those, 21 million also agree that “use of force is justified to restore Donald J. Trump to the presidency.” Our survey found that many of these 21 million people with insurrectionist sentiments have the capacity for violent mobilization. At least 7 million of them already own a gun, and at least 3 million have served in the U.S. military and so have lethal skills. Of those 21 million, 6 million said they supported right-wing militias and extremist groups, and 1 million said they are themselves or personally know a member of such a group, including the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys." ----- "..... the Jan. 6 insurrection represents a far more mainstream movement than earlier instances of right-wing extremism across the country. Those events, mostly limited to white supremacist and militia groups, saw more than 100 individuals arrested from 2015 to 2020. But just 14% of those arrested for their actions on Jan. 6 are members of those groups. More than half are business owners or middle-aged white-collar professionals, and only 7% are unemployed."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "That long path, though, has from the start had within it one fundamental flaw. If we are to make sense of wider global trends in insecurity, we have to recognise that in all the analysis around the 9/11 anniversary there lies the belief that the main security concern must be with an extreme version of Islam. It may seem a reasonable mistake, given the impact of the wars, but it still misses the point. The war on terror is better seen as one part of a global trend which goes well beyond a single religious tradition – a slow but steady move towards revolts from the margins."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACTS: "Is it not extraordinary that in a country that claims to be as enlightened and advanced as ours, the combined wealth of three individuals – Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and investor Warren Buffett – exceeds the total wealth of the bottom half of Americans? One has to return to the days of the pharaohs of Egypt to find a parallel to the extreme wealth inequality that we see in in America today." ...... "The top tax rate remained above 90 percent through the 1950s and did not dip below 70 percent until 1981. At no point during the decades that saw America’s greatest economic growth did the tax on the wealthy drop below 70 percent. Today it is somewhere around 37 percent. President Biden’s American Families Plan would increase the top tax rate to 39.6 percent – a fairly modest alteration, albeit in the right direction. It is true that there was a time when the top marginal tax was even lower than it is today: in the years leading up to the Great Depression it hovered around 25 percent."
Sep 7th 2021
EXTRACT: "But Biden can’t be blamed for the rise of the Taliban, or the fragile state of a country that has seen far too many wars and invasions. The US should not have been there in the first place, but that is a lesson that great powers never seem to learn."
Sep 4th 2021
EXTRACT: "The world is only starting to grapple with how profound the artificial-intelligence revolution will be. AI technologies will create waves of progress in critical infrastructure, commerce, transportation, health, education, financial markets, food production, and environmental sustainability. Successful adoption of AI will drive economies, reshape societies, and determine which countries set the rules for the coming century." ----- "AI will reorganize the world and change the course of human history. The democratic world must lead that process."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Although the Fed is considering tapering its quantitative easing (QE), it will likely remain dovish and behind the curve overall. Like most central banks, it has been lured into a “debt trap” by the surge in private and public liabilities (as a share of GDP) in recent years. Even if inflation stays higher than targeted, exiting QE too soon could cause bond, credit, and stock markets to crash. That would subject the economy to a hard landing, potentially forcing the Fed to reverse itself and resume QE." ---- "After all, that is what happened between the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, following the Fed’s previous attempt to raise rates and roll back QE."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Today’s economic challenges are certainly solvable, and there is no reason why inflation should have to spike."