Aug 22nd 2012

Romney Fails When it comes to “The Vision Thing”

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

After he lost the 1992 Presidential election to Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush reportedly confided that one of his major political problems was “the vision thing.” 
 
The first President Bush did not appear to voters to have a sense of where he wanted to take the country.  At every level of government, and especially President, voters want leaders with vision. And vision is just one more leadership quality that is noticeably absent in Mitt Romney – unless, of course, what you want is “rear view vision.”
 
In the four and a half decades I have consulted or managed election campaigns, one thing has become indisputably clear.  Elections are not fundamentally decided by debates about issues, or economic policies, or ideologies.  Voters choose between candidates – between living, breathing human beings.  And they make those judgments in the same way we make judgments about whom we want as a boss, or a friend or a spouse.  Voters evaluate a series of character qualities and decide who they want to be their leaders.
 
Don’t get me wrong. The economic situation, positions on issues and policies and ideologies definitely affect voter evaluation of these candidate leadership qualities.  These questions help us decide who we believe is on our side, who is an effective leader, who is committed to principle rather than simply his or her own success.  These are critical questions for voters.  But in making their decisions, voters – and especially low-information swing voters – don’t generally make detailed analyses of policy positions – or parse candidate statements.  They make their decisions based on judgments as to which candidate possesses these leadership qualities, and others that are often even more intuitive. Into the decision mix go qualities like who respects us, who has integrity, who is self-confident, who is likeable and makes an emotional connection, who inspires us – and who has a sense of vision.
 
In this fall’s election these more intuitive factors will play an especially important role in the voting decisions of the historically low number of remaining swing voters. Last week, New York Times reporter Rebecca Berg profiled these swing voters – noting that many are low-information voters who rarely follow politics.  The Times story describes Curtis Napier, a 52-year-old, swing voter from Ohio who says he does not yet have enough information to decide what to do in November.
 
“Between working full time for a fabrication company and attending school part time for a degree in manufacturing engineering, he said consideration of the presidential election was an afterthought,” wrote Berg.  
 
“In 2008, Mr. Napier drew much of his information from the presidential debates, in which he says, ‘McCain seemed to be distracted most of the time when he talked, and Obama seemed to be an educated man who has focus.’”
 
In the end, swing voters will make an intuitive judgment about which of the two Presidential candidates they want to trust as their leader.
 
Why do voters care about vision? The great baseball player Yogi Berra used to say: “If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.”  Voters want leaders who know where they are taking us in the same way that you want a pilot who knows how to get to the correct airport.
 
And especially when it comes to Presidents, voters want leaders who give them a sense that they understand the forces of history and change that will shape the future they are leading us into – the same way they want pilots who know what kind of weather lies ahead.
 
ohn F. Kennedy’s 1960 campaign centered around his vision for the future.  Kennedy’s campaign themes: “A Time for Greatness” and “Leadership for the 60’s,” and “Getting America Moving Again” gave voters a sense that he had a clear vision for America’s future.
 
In 1996, Clinton’s attacks on Bob Dole for his lack of vision were devastating.  In one commercial the Clinton campaign ran clips of Dole recounting how he had opposed Medicare, how he opposed the Department of Education and uttering his famous quote: “I’m not sure what everyone is looking for in a candidate for President.  Maybe we shouldn’t have one at all, leave it vacant.  But there’s going to be one, every country ought to have one, so we’re out here campaigning.”
 
The spot concluded: “No Vision: Wrong in the Past, Wrong in the Future.”
 
Whether it involves the future of the middle class, or the earth’s environment, or national security, Mitt Romney is visionless.
 
Then again, what would you expect from a guy who spent his career focused only on the next quarter’s bottom line?
 
Romney seems clueless when it comes to the major forces that have affected the economic prospects of everyday Americans.   He apparently never noticed that while per capita economic output (GDP) – and per capita productivity – have both steadily risen for the last twenty years, the incomes of everyday Americans have remained stagnant. 
 
There is only one way to account for this phenomena: a tiny sliver of the population has siphoned off the fruits of that increased productivity for themselves.  This is exactly what the economic data tells us is true. And that is what has left the middle class, and those who aspire to it, without the money in their pockets to buy the increasing volume of goods and services that have been generated by that increased productivity.  The resulting stagnation, coupled with an orgy of reckless speculation on Wall Street, sent us tumbling off the worst economic cliff in 60 years. 
 
But Romney’s prescription to improve the economy is to go back to exactly the same failed Bush era policies that lead to this disaster. Romney’s prescription: shower the top 2% with more tax breaks and they will allow some of that shower to trickle down to everyday people.  And, of course, Romney wants to allow Wall Street to run wild. We tried that, just four short years ago.  It didn’t work then, it won’t work now. 
 
That is precisely why the Obama campaign has labeled the Romney-Ryan ticket the “Go Back Team.” 
 
But Romney and his new running mate Paul Ryan have no intention of stopping with the Bush era: they want to return America to the Gilded Age.  They would eliminate Medicare and replace it with a “voucher” program, privatize Social Security (how would that have worked during the stock market collapse that cost pensioners 40% of their savings?), eliminate unions, repeal labor protections, and weaken safety protections for workers.
 
Romney and Ryan opposed laws to assure that women receive equal pay.  They would strip women of their right to choose and eliminate government support for contraceptives.
 
Things are just as bad when it comes to America’s relations with other countries.  Bad enough that Romney has appointed a foreign policy team that includes many of the Neo Cons who were architects of the disastrous Iraq War that cost thousands of American their lives, cost a trillion dollars of our treasure, probably caused the deaths of a million Iraqis, and besmirched America’s reputation worldwide.

But he doesn’t want to stop with the age of Neo Cons either. Romney wants to hop into a time machine and return to the Cold War.  He has made clear that Russia is America’s “chief geo-political foe.” Maybe it’s time for someone to tell Mitt that the Soviet Union collapsed almost a quarter-century ago.  Next, Mitt might propose America focus on the spread of Fascism in Europe.
 
But perhaps the most glaring thing about Mitt’s lack of vision, is the lack of evidence that he has any sense whatsoever about the forces that will shape the world we will leave to our children.
 
He bull-headedly ignores the now incontrovertible scientific evidence that human behavior is causing global climate change that will completely reshape our lives.  He attacks initiatives aimed at rebuilding America’s infrastructure to 21st century standards, and supports proposals like the Ryan budget that would cut funding for education – the single most important factor that can give our kids a better life.
 
When it comes to real threats to our national security, Romney and Ryan seem positively lost.  It isn’t just that the Romney-Ryan team has less combined foreign policy experience than any other major party ticket since World War II. 
 
The security threats of the next century will emerge from the same underlying factors that has fueled human conflict for millennia: conflict over scarce resources.  But those conflicts will take place on an unprecedented global scale, in a world where we have developed nuclear weapons that could destroy all life on the planet.    And those conflicts will be fueled by major forces that visionary action could move to contain.
 
In the next fifty years, climate change and population growth could combine to cause massive food shortages.
 
The same is true of fresh water. 
 
Without renewable replacements, the depletion of fossil fuels would certainly lead to massive conflicts over shrinking energy supplies.
 
The development of cyber weapons could paralyze our network-dependent modern economy and nuclear proliferation could put these terrible weapons into the hands of terrorists.
     
Romney flat-out opposes  -- makes fun of -- investments in renewable energy sources that would begin the process of freeing us from the tyranny of Big Oil – and oil dictators – and address the problem of climate change.
 
Rather than support movements to limit the exploding growth in the world’s population, Romney actually opposes support for birth control.
 
Have you ever heard word one from Romney about protecting our natural resources, or investment in de-salinization, or strengthening the international co-operation needed to deal with cyber-security or frankly any of these critical issues? 
 
The historian Barbara Tuchman wrote the classic account of the how the world stumbled into World War I called The Guns of August.  The book concluded that the avalanche of weapons that flooded Europe in 1917 created an unstoppable logic that overcame rationality and “required” their use.  Today Russia and the United States each still aim 1,550 nuclear warheads at the other – 25 years after the end of the Cold War. 
 
And other countries continue an inexorable demand to develop their own weapons so long as the major powers maintain their stockpiles.
 
All told, the world has 25,000 nuclear weapons of all types.  Of these, 90% are in the hands of the United States and Russia, including the strategic weapons each has targeted at the other – and many tactical weapons intended for use on the battlefield or kept in storage.  The additional 2,500 are in the hands of China, Britain, France, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea. If proliferation continues, one day nuclear weapons will almost certainly once again be used to kill – potentially millions.
 
President Obama spent a great deal of political capital to pass the START II Treaty with Russia that reduced nuclear weapons to their current levels. Obama is committed to a goal of eliminating nuclear weapons entirely and ending the madness of arming ourselves with these weapons that could never be rationally used.  Mitt Romney actually opposes the steps that are obviously necessary to reduce the odds of a nuclear Armageddon.
 
Maybe someone should tell Mitt that the two percent can’t escape these problems by sequestering themselves in gated communities, or country clubs or boarding schools.
 
But one thing is certain. Whether or not he would be capable of the kind of vision necessary to comprehend the challenges of the 21st century, Mitt Romney has demonstrated that – in exactly the same way he did with Bain Capital – he believes he owes unquestioned loyalty to the bottom line of his investors.  And in the case of his run for the Presidency, those investors are the oil companies, the Wall Street banks, and the wealthy ultra-right wing donors and defense contractors whose interests are embedded in the status quo and have no interest whatsoever in having a visionary President.
 
The choice is clear.  It is no accident that the slogan of the Obama re-election campaign is “Forward.”
 
 

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Apr 16th 2021
EXTRACT: "When we examined the development of nations worldwide since 1820, we found that among rich Western countries like the United States, the Netherlands and France, improvements in income, education, safety and health tracked or even outpaced rising gross domestic product for over a century. But in the 1950s, even as economic growth accelerated after World War II, well-being in these countries lagged.
Apr 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "Some presidents indulge in the “Mount Rushmore syndrome” making an obvious effort to achieve greatness. Normally soft-spoken and apparently modest Biden is making his own bid for immortality."
Apr 9th 2021
EXTRACT: "New ways of thinking about the role of government are as important as new priorities. Many commentators have framed Biden’s infrastructure plan as a return to big government. But the package is spread over eight years, will raise public spending by only one percentage point of GDP, and is projected to pay for itself eventually. A boost in public investment in infrastructure, the green transition, and job creation is long overdue."
Apr 7th 2021
EXTRACT: " One can, and perhaps should, take the optimistic view that moral panics in the US blow over; reason will once again prevail. It could be that the Biden era will take the sting out of Trumpism, and the tolerance for which American intellectual life has often been admired will be reinvigorated. This might even happen while the noxious effects of American influence still rage in other countries. For the sake of America and the world, one can only hope it happens soon.  "
Mar 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "By refusing (despite having some good reasons) to end electoral gerrymandering, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has directly enabled the paralyzing hyper-partisanship that reached its nadir during Donald Trump’s presidency. By striking down all limits on corporate spending on political campaigns in the infamous 2010 Citizens United decision, he has helped to entrench dark money in US politics. And by gutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. Holder, Roberts has facilitated the racist voter-suppression tactics now being pursued in many Republican-controlled states."
Mar 24th 2021
EXTRACT: "the UK’s tough choices accumulate, and the problems lurking around the corner look menacing. Britain will have to make the best of Brexit. But it will be a long, hard struggle, all the more so with an evasive fabulist in charge."
Mar 15th 2021
EXTRACT: "Over the years, the approach of most American policymakers toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been Israel-centric with near total disregard for the suffering endured by the Palestinian people. The architects of policy in successive US administrations have discussed the conflict as if the fate of only one party (Israel) really mattered. Israelis were treated as full human beings with hopes and fears, while Palestinians were reduced to a problem that needed to be solved so that Israelis could live in peace and security.  ..... It is not just that Israelis and Palestinians haven’t been viewed with an equal measure of concern. It’s worse than that. It appears that Palestinians were judged as less ​human than Israelis, and were, therefore, not entitled to make demands to have their rights recognized and protected."
Mar 8th 2021
EXTRACTS: "XThere’s a global shortage in semiconductors, and it’s becoming increasingly serious." ...... "The automotive sector has been worst affected by the drought, in an era where microchips now form the backbone of most cars. Ford is predicting a 20% slump in production and Tesla shut down its model 3 assembly line for two weeks. In the UK, Honda was forced to temporarily shut its plant as well." ..... " As much as 70% of the world’s semiconductors are manufactured by just two companies, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) and Samsung."
Mar 5th 2021
EXTRACT: "Back in 1992, Lawrence H. Summers, then the chief economist at the World Bank, and I warned that pushing the US Federal Reserve’s annual inflation target down from 4% to 2% risked causing big problems. Not only was the 4% target not producing any discontent, but a 2% target would increase the risk of the Fed’s interest-rate policy hitting the zero lower bound. Our objections went unheeded. Fed Chair Alan Greenspan reduced the inflation target to 2%, and we have been paying for it ever since. I have long thought that many of our economic problems would go away if we could rejigger asset markets in such a way as to make a 5% federal funds rate consistent with full employment in the late stage of a business cycle."
Mar 2nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Under these conditions, the Fed is probably worried that markets will instantly crash if it takes away the punch bowl. And with the increase in public and private debt preventing the eventual monetary normalization, the likelihood of stagflation in the medium term – and a hard landing for asset markets and economies – continues to increase."
Mar 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Massive fiscal and monetary stimulus programs in the United States and other advanced economies are fueling a raging debate about whether higher inflation could be just around the corner. Ten-year US Treasury yields and mortgage rates are already climbing in anticipation that the US Federal Reserve – the de facto global central bank – will be forced to hike rates, potentially bursting asset-price bubbles around the world. But while markets are probably overstating short-term inflation risks for 2021, they do not yet fully appreciate the longer-term dangers."
Feb 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "To be sure, calls to “build back better” from the pandemic imply some awareness of the need for systemic change. But the transformation we need extends beyond constructing modern infrastructure or unlocking private investment in any one country. We need to re-orient – indeed, re-invent – global politics, so that countries can cooperate far more effectively in creating a better world."
Feb 23rd 2021
EXTRACT: "So, notwithstanding the predictable release of pent-up demand for consumer durables, face-to-face services show clear evidence – in terms of both consumer demand and employment – of permanent scarring. Consequently, with the snapback of pent-up demand for durables nearing its point of exhaustion, the recovery of the post-pandemic US economy is likely to fall well short of vaccine development’s “warp speed.” "
Feb 20th 2021
EXTRACT: "Human rights abuses under Erdogan are beyond the pale of inhumanity and moral decadence. The list of Erdogan’s violations and cruelty is too long to numerate. The detention and horrifying torture of thousands of innocent people for months and at times for years, without being charged, is hard to fathom. Many prisoners are left languishing in dark cells, often in solitary confinement. The detention of tens of thousands of men and hundreds of women, many with their children, especially following the 2016 failed coup, has become common. It is calculated to inflict horrendous pain and suffering to bring the prisoners to the breaking point, so that they confess to crimes they have never committed."
Feb 20th 2021
Courtyard of the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, circa 1670, (Job Adriaenszoon Berckheyde).
Feb 12th 2021
EXTRACT: "Global regulators will no doubt be concerned about a potential volatility spillover from digital asset prices into traditional capital markets. They may not permit what could quickly amount to effective proxy approval by the back door for companies holding large proportions of a volatile asset on their balance sheets."
Feb 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "Since Russians began protesting opposition leader Alexei Navalny’s imprisonment, the security forces have apparently had carte blanche to arrest demonstrators – and they have done so by the thousands. If Russians so much as honk their car horns in solidarity with the protesters, they risk personal repercussions. The official response to the protests goes beyond the Kremlin’s past repression. It is war."
Feb 6th 2021
EXTRACT: ".......like Biden, Roosevelt was certainly no revolutionary. His task was to save American capitalism. He was a repairer, a fixer. The New Deal was achieved not because of Roosevelt’s genius or heroism, but because enough people trusted him to act in good faith. That is precisely what people are expecting from Biden, too. He must save US democracy from the ravages of a political crisis. To do so, he must reestablish trust in the system. He has promised to make his country less polarized, and to restore civility and truth to political discourse. In this endeavor, his lack of charisma may turn out to be his greatest strength. For all that he lacks in grandeur, he makes up for by exuding an air of decency."
Feb 2nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Europe must not lose sight of the long game, which inevitably will center on China, not Russia or relations with post-Brexit Britain. China is already establishing a presence in Iran, and demonstrating that it has the capital, know-how, and technology to project power and influence beyond its borders. Should it succeed in turning the Belt and Road Initiative into a line of geopolitical stepping-stones, it might soon emerge at Europe’s southeastern border in a form that no one in the EU foresaw."
Jan 29th 2021
EXTRACT: "One sign of this change is that, unlike all recent Democratic administrations, Biden’s hasn’t paid obeisance to Wall Street by giving bankers top jobs. The new Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, is a former Federal Reserve chair and academic who has made it clear that she understands the country’s pressing social needs. Moreover, Biden consulted Warren on her economic views, and has named a former Warren adviser as Yellen’s deputy. Yellen’s appointment demonstrates that Biden shares the insight that enabled Trump’s rise: that too many Americans feel that they cannot get a fair share. "