Nov 25th 2014

Seven Reasons Why Obama’s Executive Action on Immigration Is Great Policy and Great Politics

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
Ten years ago, following President George Bush’s 2004 re-election victory, Progressives were back on their heels.  Bush decided to press his advantage by launching a campaign to privatize Social Security, seeking to eliminate the crown jewel of the New Deal: guaranteed Social Security benefits.
 
Progressives rallied in an unprecedented campaign to defeat privatization that stopped Bush’s offensive cold.  The battle over Social Security privatization turned the political tide. It began a progressive counter offensive that ultimately led to the Democratic takeover of the House in 2006 and the presidency in 2008.
 
The campaign Republicans have launched to undo President Obama’s executive order on immigration may have the same mid- and long-term effect on the prospects of the Republican Party.  Here are seven reasons why:
 
Reason #1:  Most importantly, President Obama’s action is sound policy – that resonates with ordinary Americans once they understand what it actually does.
 
If you just ask voters whether the President should take executive action to help fix the nation’s broken immigration system, a plurality have reservations.   But when they find out what it does, they are very supportive.
 
On Friday, Hart Research published a poll commissioned by Americans United for Change.   Voters were read the following accurate description of the President’s Executive Action: 
 
The action would direct immigration enforcement officials to focus on threats to national security and public safety, and not on deporting otherwise law-abiding immigrants. Immigrants who are parents of children who are legal US residents could qualify to stay and work temporarily in the United States, without being deported, if they have lived in the United States for at least five years, pay taxes, and pass a criminal background check.
 
A memo by Hart Associates Geoff Garin and Guy Molyneaux summarizes the results.
 
Voters respond favorably by an overwhelming 39-point margin to executive action by President Obama that would focus immigration enforcement efforts on threats to national security and public safety while allowing some illegal immigrants to stay and work in the United States (67% favorable, 28% unfavorable).
 
Support is broad, incorporating a majority of voters in every region of the country, among both men and women, and in states won by both Barack Obama (67% favorable) and Mitt Romney (65% favorable). Younger voters under age 35 express particularly strong support (72%), but more than 60% feel favorable in every age cohort.
 
Executive action receives support from 91% of Democrats and 67% of political independents. While a narrow 51% majority of Republicans oppose executive action (41% favor), this is driven mainly by a 34-point margin of opposition among Tea Party Republicans (30% favor, 64% oppose). Among non-Tea Party Republicans opinion is more divided, with 47% in favor and 45% opposed.
 
Republicans have hitched their major attack on Executive Action to the notion that the action is illegal – that the President has exceeded his constitutional authority.  But the fact is that 11 presidents have taken similar actions with respect to immigration policy -- using the prosecutorial discretion granted by the law -- 39 times over 60 years.
 
Republican George H.W. Bush took a similar action affecting 1.5 million people – without a peep from some of the same Republicans who today charge the President Obama has declared himself “emperor.”
 
Bottom line: the more voters know about the President’s Executive Action, the more they like it. 
 
Reason #2:  There is very little the Republicans can do to stop the President’s Executive Action without resorting to extreme measures that will alienate massive numbers of voters. 
 
Administration lawyers believe that – given the long list of precedents for exactly this kind of Executive Action -- their position is legally air tight.   The President’s two criteria for action appear to have been first, to do as much as possible to fix the broken immigration system using the limited power that he possesses under the law and second, to assure that the action is legally unassailable.
 
Most of the provisions of these Executive Actions are funded by the Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) of the Department of Homeland Security that is entirely financed through fees.  That means Republican appropriators can’t cut off funding, though they could insert riders to legislative language seeking to ban the use of these fees to execute this policy.  In this case the President would be forced to veto the legislation and – if the Republicans persist as they did last year trying to insert similar language about the Affordable Health Care Act -- that would lead them into the box canyon of government shutdown-- the last place the GOP leadership wants to go, since it was a political disaster last time.
 
Reason #3:  A battle to stop Executive Action will stain the Republican brand with Hispanic and Asian American voters for a generation.
 
By the next election in 2016, only two groups will feel strongly about the President’s action on immigration – Tea Party conservatives who represent a small minority of Americans and who all vote Republican no matter what – and recent immigrants, especially Hispanics and Asians.
 
If the Republicans choose to go to war over these Executive Actions, Hispanics, Asians and other recent immigrants won’t hear Republican claims about “executive overreach.”   The message they will hear is simple: Republican don’t care about Hispanics, Asians and other recent immigrants.  In fact, they will hear that many Republican fire-brands positively dislike Hispanics, Asians and other immigrant voters.
 
Republicans can talk until they are blue in the face about tax policy and “small government.” None of that will matter if Hispanic and Asian voters feel that Republicans simply aren’t on their side – that they are disrespected, disliked and shutout by the GOP.   
 
Immigration is not just another policy issue.  It’s a matter of identity  -- it’s a matter of respect and meaning. It’s about whether or not the Republican Party believes that Hispanics and Asians matter as fellow Americans.
 
By going to war to stop the president’s Executive Action on immigration, the GOP will set in concrete the kind of political realignment among Hispanic and Asian American voters that they experienced with African American voters as a result of their opposition to civil rights. Hispanics and Asians will be lost to the GOP for a generation.
 
The magnitude of this loss could be stunning, since Hispanics are the fastest-growing segment of the population and Asian Americans are not far behind.
 
Republicans might be able to win some solid Red states without Hispanic and Asian American voters.  But they can’t win a Presidential contest without a respectable share of the Hispanic and Asian American vote.   And given the Senate seats that are up for grabs in the next cycle – and presidential year turnouts – it will be very difficult for them to maintain control of the Senate, and maybe even the House, without Hispanic and Asian American votes.
 
Reason #4: People fight much harder to prevent others from taking away what they have, than they do to achieve things to which they aspire.
 
Once voters have Social Security and Medicare coverage, once families have health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, it’s much harder to change those programs to take those benefits away.  When people have an actual stake in something – when you have to rip it from their hands – they fight like crazy to protect it.
 
To rescind the President’s executive action, Republicans must now propose taking away the deferred action he has granted.  Immigrants – and their relatives who vote -- will put up a hell of a fight.
 
Reason #5: The battle over the President’s executive action will empower the most extreme, anti-immigrant Tea Party elements of the GOP.  People like Senator Ted Cruz will use it to build his base and reputation as an uncompromising champion of far right-wing extremism – pandering to the opposition among Tea Partiers that was reflected in the Hart Research poll numbers.
 
The Republican leadership didn’t want to shut down the government any more in 2013 than it does this year, but their caucuses were highjacked by the Tea Party zealots who led them into a horribly unpopular, losing government shutdown in their crusade to stop the Affordable Care Act. 
 
That could easily happen in 2014 – or early in 2015. 
 
And the impact on the Republican presidential field could also be significant. Anti-immigrant Representative Steve King has already demanded that all of the aspiring GOP presidential candidates attend his Iowa event in January to pledge that they would rescind the President’s order.  That will push the GOP field further and further to the right – just as candidate pledges during the primaries to veto the Dream Act alienated a record number of Hispanic voters in 2012.
 
And it’s not just Hispanics and Asians who are alienated by virulent anti-immigrant talk.   Many independent women voters and young people simply don’t understand and don’t want to be associated with hateful statements like those of Steve King and Tim Huelskamp.
 
Reason #6: Immigration is a wedge issue in the Republican Party.  The more the battle over Executive Action drives the party’s agenda, the less unified the Republican Party will be.
 
The battle over the President’s immigration action may at first appear to unite Republicans because they all have to stand up and salute the Tea Party’s demand that it be stopped.  But behind the scenes, it is deeply divisive within the Republican Party.
 
The corporate, big-business wing of the party supports comprehensive immigration reform of the sort that passed the Senate with 68 votes.  They also understand the electoral math when it comes to Hispanic and Asian voters. 
 
The Wall Street crowd doesn’t think it bought control of the Senate so Republican power can be squandered appeasing a bunch of Tea Party activists who don’t like Hispanics.  They want tax breaks, and trade bills, and deregulation that will make them money.    
 
Reason #7:  Politically, the best thing the GOP could do in the next year is to demonstrate that it is capable of governing by passing legislation that could actually be signed into law. 
 
The rift between business Republicans and the Tea Party made that hard to start with.  But the reaction to the president’s executive action in the Tea Party faction may make it impossible. 
 
And the President’s action will put enormous new pressure on House Speaker Boehner to take action on immigration itself.  For over 500 days, Boehner has refused to allow an up or down vote on the bi-partisan Senate bill that passed with the support of over two-thirds – including conservative stalwarts like John McCain and Marco Rubio. 
 
Had he called the vote, it would have passed with the support of a small group of Republicans and virtually every Democrat.  But that would have enraged the Tea Party wing of his caucus, which is about to grow as a result of this fall’s election. 
 
The GOP’s failure to show that it can govern will be a huge problem for the GOP in 2016.  When it comes to immigration the best thing they could do for their brand would be to allow a vote on the Senate bill during the lame duck session.  The vote would succeed, the President would sign it, the Executive Action would no longer be relevant, they would get some credit with Hispanics, Asians and moderate women, and this massive political problem would be behind them. 
 
     But there are very low odds the GOP leadership in the House will take this common sense step, since it is not in “Speaker” Ted Cruz’s interest to allow it to do so.  Cruz has a major base among Tea Party House Members and when it comes to immigration, the Tea Party faction has called the shots.
 
While the Republicans are scrambling to figure out their next steps and keep their forces together, the President and Democrats are taking victory laps with cheering crowds of recent immigrants who are mobilizing to stand up and defend Executive Action.
 
Bad week for the GOP.
 
You can follow Robert Creamer on Twitter @rbcreamer.



Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Nov 30th 2021
EXTRACT: "So it could well be that, despite the faster spread of the infection, its ultimate health, social and economic impact proves negligible. We simply do not know at this point. But detecting more uncertainty than before, financial markets have reacted with panic. For example, the S&P500 tumbled 2.3% on Friday November 26 only to rise 1.1% on Monday November 29. Most markets gave up between 2% and 4%, which is a pretty substantial one-day fall."
Nov 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "Momentous changes are casting a long shadow on China. The country’s political system will soon undergo a profound reform, pending final approval (a quasi-formality) at next year’s congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC). President Xi Jinping, the Party chairman and the “navigator” of the country, has decided on a new course, abandoning the principle of collective leadership. Xi is leading China away from the path taken by Deng Xiaoping after the terror of the Cultural Revolution, and back toward a system of absolute rule by one person without term limits, as under Mao Zedong."
Nov 25th 2021
EXTRACTS: "”The biggest disappointment in Glasgow was the last-minute watering down of the proposed (and widely supported) agreement to “phase out” the use of coal in energy production. With India providing political cover for China in vetoing this language, the final conference proposal was to “phase down” coal”. ---- “China accounts for more than half of the world’s coal consumption, and has the largest amount of coal-fired generating capacity under construction. Pressed about why his country would not do more in Glasgow to help save the planet, China’s chief negotiator pointed to the commitments in the Communist Party of China’s current Five-Year Plan. So, our future now depends on the CPC’s program. The tragedy for the world is that the Party cannot be phased down, much less phased out, despite the fact that it is a huge threat to the future of all of us.” ------ “To save the planet, robust democratic leadership must be phased up – not phased down, let alone phased out. Rather than merely keeping our fingers crossed and hoping for the best, we should start by calling out the appalling behavior of dictatorships such as China and Russia.”
Nov 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "The transitory inflation debate in the United States is over. The upsurge in US inflation has turned into something far worse than the Federal Reserve expected. Perpetually optimistic financial markets are taking this largely in stride. The Fed is widely presumed to have both the wisdom and the firepower to keep underlying inflation in check. That remains to be seen."
Nov 14th 2021
EXTRACT: "S&P projects that companies are planning to install 44 gigawatts of new solar in 2022. The year 2020, despite the onset of the pandemic, saw a record-breaking 19 gigawatts of new solar capacity installed in the U.S. So given the bids out there already, it appears that in 2022 solar installers will more than double their best year ever so far. The U.S. currently has 100 gigawatts of solar electricity-generating capacity, so in just one year we are poised to add nearly 50% of our current total. A gigawatt of power can provide electricity to about 750,000 homes. So the 44 new gigawatts we’ll put in next year have a nameplate capacity that would under ideal conditions allow them to power 33 million homes." ----- "Not only is there a lot of good news on the green energy front but there is good news in the bad news for fossil fuels. S&P finds that coal plants are being retired way before the utilities had expected. Some 29 gigawatts of coal retirements are expected from 2020 through 2025. "
Nov 3rd 2021
EXTRACT: "Zemmour’s way of thinking stems from a tradition going back to the French Revolution of 1789. Catholic conservatives and right-wing intellectuals, who hated the secular republic that emerged from the revolution, have long fulminated against liberals, cosmopolitans, immigrants, and other enemies of their idea of a society based on ethnic purity, obedience to the church, and family values. They were almost invariably anti-Semitic. When Jewish army Captain Alfred Dreyfus was falsely accused of betraying his country in the notorious scandal of the 1890s, they were on the side of Dreyfus’s accusers. ---- Germany’s invasion of France in 1940 gave reactionaries of this kind the chance to form a French puppet-government in Vichy. Zemmour has had kind things to say about the Vichy regime. He also has expressed some doubt about the innocence of Dreyfus. ---- None of these views would be surprising if they came from a far-right agitator like Jean-Marie Le Pen. But Zemmour is the son of Sephardic Jewish immigrants from Algeria who lived among the Muslim Berbers."
Oct 27th 2021
EXTRACT: "performed strongly in last month’s parliamentary and regional elections. Officially, Communist Party candidates took 18.9% of the popular vote for the State Duma (parliament), compared to nearly 49.8% for the Kremlin’s United Russia party. But the Communists refused to recognize the results, insisting that the vote was rigged. And, indeed, some experts estimate that they should have gotten around 30% of the vote, with United Russia taking about 35%."
Oct 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Powell was charismatic in the true sense of the term. Nowadays, this description is too often used to indicate an ability to attract supporters or generate celebrity interest. Internet lists of those who are regarded as charismatic include characters as varied as Adolf Hitler, Bono, Donald Trump, George Clooney, and Rihanna. But the ancient Greeks and Saint Paul used “charisma” to describe values-based leadership infused with a charm capable of inspiring devotion. The Greeks believed that this quality was a gift of grace, while Christian theology regarded it as a power given by the Holy Spirit."
Oct 17th 2021
EXTRACTS: "But property-sector woes are not the only economic danger China faces in 2021-22. The Chinese government’s mounting crackdown on the country’s burgeoning tech sector may pose an even greater threat." ---- "According to a recent study by McKinsey & Company, the share of Chinese urban employment supported by private enterprises more than quadrupled between 1995 and 2018, from just 18% to 87%. The share of exports generated by the private sector more than doubled over the same period, from 34% to 88%. And private-sector fixed-asset investment jumped from 42% to 65% of the total. The message in the data is clear: clamping down on the private sector and threatening innovators is not the way to ensure sustained rapid growth. Chinese entrepreneurs can read the writing on the wall. They understand that their political and regulatory room to maneuver is shrinking, and that the balance has shifted in favor of state-owned firms and public officials. And they understand that this uneasy atmosphere is likely to persist."
Oct 16th 2021
EXTRACT: "We designed a programme that incorporated data from over 300 million buildings and analysed 130 million km² of land – almost the entire land surface area of the planet. This estimated how much energy could be produced from the 0.2 million km² of rooftops present on that land, an area roughly the same size as the UK."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "Britain in the 1950s was wedded to the US, acting as a partner rather than leading the charge. Now, while the UK continues to support the US, the influence it has seems negligible. While it may bring comfort to the UK to feel it is a partner to a superpower, being its stooge or subordinate is an unpleasant place to be, no matter how much you tell yourself it values your opinion."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "That was then. Now, the Chinese government has doubled down, with President Xi Jinping throwing the full force of his power into a “common prosperity” campaign aimed at addressing inequalities of income and wealth. Moreover, the regulatory net has been broadened, not just to ban cryptocurrencies, but also to become an instrument of social engineering, with the government adding e-cigarettes, business drinking, and celebrity fan culture to its ever-lengthening list of bad social habits. All this only compounds the concerns I raised two months ago. The new dual thrust of Chinese policy – redistribution plus re-regulation – strikes at the heart of the market-based “reform and opening up” that have underpinned China’s growth miracle since the days of Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s. It will subdue the entrepreneurial activity that has been so important in powering China’s dynamic private sector, with lasting consequences for the next, innovations-driven, phase of Chinese economic development. Without animal spirits, the case for indigenous innovation is in tatters."
Oct 5th 2021
EXTRACT: "Wartime nostalgia plays an important part in Britain’s instinctive fondness for the special relationship. Like former Prime Minister Tony Blair in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some British politicians might believe that the United Kingdom is the only European country with serious armed forces and the political will to use them. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, like Blair before him, seems to fancy himself a modern-day Churchill. Unfortunately (or not), Britain’s military power is insignificant compared to what Churchill could command in 1944. Wartime nostalgia has drawn Britain into several foolish American wars, which other European countries were wise to avoid."
Sep 24th 2021
EXTRACTS: "We have found that 47 million American adults – nearly 1 in 5 – agree with the statement that “the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.” Of those, 21 million also agree that “use of force is justified to restore Donald J. Trump to the presidency.” Our survey found that many of these 21 million people with insurrectionist sentiments have the capacity for violent mobilization. At least 7 million of them already own a gun, and at least 3 million have served in the U.S. military and so have lethal skills. Of those 21 million, 6 million said they supported right-wing militias and extremist groups, and 1 million said they are themselves or personally know a member of such a group, including the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys." ----- "..... the Jan. 6 insurrection represents a far more mainstream movement than earlier instances of right-wing extremism across the country. Those events, mostly limited to white supremacist and militia groups, saw more than 100 individuals arrested from 2015 to 2020. But just 14% of those arrested for their actions on Jan. 6 are members of those groups. More than half are business owners or middle-aged white-collar professionals, and only 7% are unemployed."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "That long path, though, has from the start had within it one fundamental flaw. If we are to make sense of wider global trends in insecurity, we have to recognise that in all the analysis around the 9/11 anniversary there lies the belief that the main security concern must be with an extreme version of Islam. It may seem a reasonable mistake, given the impact of the wars, but it still misses the point. The war on terror is better seen as one part of a global trend which goes well beyond a single religious tradition – a slow but steady move towards revolts from the margins."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACTS: "Is it not extraordinary that in a country that claims to be as enlightened and advanced as ours, the combined wealth of three individuals – Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and investor Warren Buffett – exceeds the total wealth of the bottom half of Americans? One has to return to the days of the pharaohs of Egypt to find a parallel to the extreme wealth inequality that we see in in America today." ...... "The top tax rate remained above 90 percent through the 1950s and did not dip below 70 percent until 1981. At no point during the decades that saw America’s greatest economic growth did the tax on the wealthy drop below 70 percent. Today it is somewhere around 37 percent. President Biden’s American Families Plan would increase the top tax rate to 39.6 percent – a fairly modest alteration, albeit in the right direction. It is true that there was a time when the top marginal tax was even lower than it is today: in the years leading up to the Great Depression it hovered around 25 percent."
Sep 7th 2021
EXTRACT: "But Biden can’t be blamed for the rise of the Taliban, or the fragile state of a country that has seen far too many wars and invasions. The US should not have been there in the first place, but that is a lesson that great powers never seem to learn."
Sep 4th 2021
EXTRACT: "The world is only starting to grapple with how profound the artificial-intelligence revolution will be. AI technologies will create waves of progress in critical infrastructure, commerce, transportation, health, education, financial markets, food production, and environmental sustainability. Successful adoption of AI will drive economies, reshape societies, and determine which countries set the rules for the coming century." ----- "AI will reorganize the world and change the course of human history. The democratic world must lead that process."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Although the Fed is considering tapering its quantitative easing (QE), it will likely remain dovish and behind the curve overall. Like most central banks, it has been lured into a “debt trap” by the surge in private and public liabilities (as a share of GDP) in recent years. Even if inflation stays higher than targeted, exiting QE too soon could cause bond, credit, and stock markets to crash. That would subject the economy to a hard landing, potentially forcing the Fed to reverse itself and resume QE." ---- "After all, that is what happened between the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, following the Fed’s previous attempt to raise rates and roll back QE."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Today’s economic challenges are certainly solvable, and there is no reason why inflation should have to spike."