Jan 10th 2011

Time to Stand Up for the Public Sector

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

For over forty years, the right wing has mounted an irrepressible campaign to discredit the very concept of government in the United States.

It continued its campaign to demonize government even as we watched first responders-government employees -- run into the collapsing twin towers to rescue their fellow citizens on September 11, 2001. They continued to defame the concept of government in the face of daily reports of the bravery and sacrifice of our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan - all representing the Government of the United States of America.

The Right even continued this drum beat in the face of the most spectacular recent failure of its anti-public sector philosophy - the 2008 financial collapse. They simply ignored what was obvious to the entire world: that today's economic crisis was caused by the fact that Republicans had essentially ended effective public sector oversight of the big Wall Street Banks whose greed and recklessness caused the worst economic crisis in 60 years and cost eight million Americans their jobs.

In the Republican moral universe, the private sector is good, and the public sector is evil - it's as simple as that.

This week, the new House Republican Majority rode into Washington, DC to promote an anti-public sector agenda that is overtly aimed at shrinking the "evil" Federal government.
Progressives can no longer allow the radical right to define the concept of Government in the United States. It's time to proudly and forcefully stand up for the public sector.

The Progressive concept of government is rooted in the Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

Wall Street banks are not instituted to secure these rights - neither are giant international corporations, nor private insurance companies, nor big oil conglomerates. Democratic governments are instituted to protect and advance those unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Government is the vehicle through which we assure that the notion that "all men are created equal" is realized in the real world because it is the only institution in society that represents all of us, where - at least theoretically - every American is equal and has equal power to shape society's goals.

Government is the place where democracy lives. It is, as Congressman Barney Frank says, the name we give for the things we choose to do together.

The wealthy elites that dominate the American Right have financed the campaign to demonize government because they want the opportunity to pursue a very different group of values that have nothing to do with America's founding principles. They want the right to concentrate more and more wealth and power into their own hands.

They are not interested in "democracy" or the notion that "all men and women are created equal." They are devoted to plutocracy - to the notion that they should have the unfettered ability to accumulate a larger and larger share of the fruits of our economy - and more and more control over the natural resources that belong to us all.

For the last forty years, the Right's attempts to demonize government is one of the reasons why the wealthy and big Wall Street banks have been allowed to siphon off a greater and greater share of the nation's wealth from the middle class. For the last twenty years, middle class incomes have been stagnant. Every dime of economic growth has ultimately flowed to the top 2% of the population.

Today the distribution of wealth is more polarized than at any other time since 1928. Today, the top one percent of the population controls as much total wealth as does the bottom 90%.
The Right's campaign to demonize government was intended to create the backdrop for its successful attempts to end the oversight of the big Wall Street banks that had prevented a recurrence of the Great Depression for more than 50 years. They wanted to be free to make huge sums of money through speculation and financial schemes that allowed them unimaginable rates of return - but risked the stability of the entire economy.

They succeeded in eliminating that oversight. They gambled on everything -- with everyone else's money. They collapsed the economy, they got bailed out - and many of them are still raking in multi-million dollar bonuses while millions of their victims remain unemployed.
Now one of the key items of the Republican agenda is to eviscerate the newly-passed Wall Street Reform legislation that is one of the most important accomplishments of the Obama Administration and Democratic Congress.

But that's not all. The new Republican House majority wants to repeal the health care reform law to allow private insurance companies once again to have free rein to deny care to those with pre-existing conditions, revoke coverage when people get sick, and raise rates whenever they please. They rail against the cost of health care while protecting a bloated private sector system that requires that Americans pay twice as much per capita for health care than the citizens of any other industrial democracy - and get health care outcomes that rank only 37th in the world.

The Republicans want to pass new legislation easing the way for states to file for bankruptcy so they can void union contracts, and cut public services.

They have passed new "cut-as-you-go" rules for the House which require that in order to spend a new dollar on a critical public service, the new expenditure must be paid for by a cut in some other expenditure - never by any increase in revenue.

Worse, their rules do not require that tax cuts - including tax cuts for the rich - be paid for by anything. So much for their alleged concern for the deficit.

In fact, the Right has never really been concerned about the deficit. Remember that only a decade ago, the Federal Government had budget surpluses as far as the eye could see. But beginning in 2001, the Bush Administration and Republican Congress cut taxes for the rich and launched two unpaid-for wars that created a ballooning Federal deficit. Right wing leader Grover Norquist was quite explicit that the Republicans created that deficit intentionally to generate the political and financial pressure to shrink the role of government.

And, of course, the Right has never let the facts stand in its way. You have to admire how brazenly they are willing to distort reality. Republicans argue daily that cutting government spending - even in the near term - will create jobs, when from an economic point of view exactly the opposite is true.

Virtually every mainstream economist in America agrees that funds for unemployment compensation, infrastructure projects, food stamps, funding to prevent the layoffs of teachers, and firefighters and police officers are the best ways to create jobs - and multiples of economic activity, since expenditures are used by everyday consumers to buy products and services from businesses in local communities.

And one thing we have learned all over again as a result of the 2008 economic collapse: a strong, vibrant public sector is necessary to assure a strong, vibrant private sector.
For the private sector to prosper, countries need an economic environment that includes high-quality public education, safe secure communities, an effective healthcare system, and an efficient transportation and communications infrastructure. A strong public sector is necessary to provide that environment.

And a clear, strong set of rules is necessary to prevent powerful economic elites from engaging in activity that threatens the entire economy - and to create clear expectations that allow entrepreneurs to make long-term investments with confidence. All of that requires a strong public sector.

In fact, a strong public sector is necessary to assure competitive markets that would otherwise be dominated by the largest, most powerful economic actors.
Progressives believe that there is an important role for private markets and private economic activity - and that there is also an indispensable role for public sector economic activity.
Intentional attempts by the Republican right to demonize and weaken government do not ultimately strengthen the private sector in America. Individual actors may strengthen their own domination of our economy and society - and concentrate wealth in their own hands. But the long-term effect - as we have seen over the last two years - is to weaken private sector economic activity and destroy the quality of our lives.

In fact, long-term economic growth requires widely-shared economic growth. It requires a strong middle class that has money in its pockets to buy products and services. Widely-shared economic growth does not happen if the wealthiest corporations are allowed to use their disproportionate economic power to dominate our economy and society. Only a strong public sector can assure widely-shared prosperity.

Finally, we must remember that the public sector is the one place in society where - at least in theory -- all of us participate as equals. For over two centuries America has struggled to perfect its government to actually embody that ideal. The Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United case that allowed corporations to spend unlimited sums on elections - and conferred on them even more rights of "personhood" -- was a blow to making that ideal a reality. But if we are ever to make that democratic ideal a reality, it will only be through government. Every person does not stand as an equal in the private sector economic marketplace. We each cast our "dollar votes," which vary enormously between us - and are concentrated in the hands of giant conglomerates or Wall Street banks.

But we do stand equal before the ballot box. And we can work to make us all equal in our access to public education, or health care, or public services - when it comes to the baseline access to the resources that are necessary for each of us to fulfill our potential and exercise actual freedom.

Only democratic government can make that happen, and it is time for us to stand up for democratic government with the same ardor as those who first wrote that to protect our unalienable rights, governments are instituted among men.

Robert Creamer's book: Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available onAmazon.com.

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Nov 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "Momentous changes are casting a long shadow on China. The country’s political system will soon undergo a profound reform, pending final approval (a quasi-formality) at next year’s congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC). President Xi Jinping, the Party chairman and the “navigator” of the country, has decided on a new course, abandoning the principle of collective leadership. Xi is leading China away from the path taken by Deng Xiaoping after the terror of the Cultural Revolution, and back toward a system of absolute rule by one person without term limits, as under Mao Zedong."
Nov 25th 2021
EXTRACTS: "”The biggest disappointment in Glasgow was the last-minute watering down of the proposed (and widely supported) agreement to “phase out” the use of coal in energy production. With India providing political cover for China in vetoing this language, the final conference proposal was to “phase down” coal”. ---- “China accounts for more than half of the world’s coal consumption, and has the largest amount of coal-fired generating capacity under construction. Pressed about why his country would not do more in Glasgow to help save the planet, China’s chief negotiator pointed to the commitments in the Communist Party of China’s current Five-Year Plan. So, our future now depends on the CPC’s program. The tragedy for the world is that the Party cannot be phased down, much less phased out, despite the fact that it is a huge threat to the future of all of us.” ------ “To save the planet, robust democratic leadership must be phased up – not phased down, let alone phased out. Rather than merely keeping our fingers crossed and hoping for the best, we should start by calling out the appalling behavior of dictatorships such as China and Russia.”
Nov 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "The transitory inflation debate in the United States is over. The upsurge in US inflation has turned into something far worse than the Federal Reserve expected. Perpetually optimistic financial markets are taking this largely in stride. The Fed is widely presumed to have both the wisdom and the firepower to keep underlying inflation in check. That remains to be seen."
Nov 14th 2021
EXTRACT: "S&P projects that companies are planning to install 44 gigawatts of new solar in 2022. The year 2020, despite the onset of the pandemic, saw a record-breaking 19 gigawatts of new solar capacity installed in the U.S. So given the bids out there already, it appears that in 2022 solar installers will more than double their best year ever so far. The U.S. currently has 100 gigawatts of solar electricity-generating capacity, so in just one year we are poised to add nearly 50% of our current total. A gigawatt of power can provide electricity to about 750,000 homes. So the 44 new gigawatts we’ll put in next year have a nameplate capacity that would under ideal conditions allow them to power 33 million homes." ----- "Not only is there a lot of good news on the green energy front but there is good news in the bad news for fossil fuels. S&P finds that coal plants are being retired way before the utilities had expected. Some 29 gigawatts of coal retirements are expected from 2020 through 2025. "
Nov 3rd 2021
EXTRACT: "Zemmour’s way of thinking stems from a tradition going back to the French Revolution of 1789. Catholic conservatives and right-wing intellectuals, who hated the secular republic that emerged from the revolution, have long fulminated against liberals, cosmopolitans, immigrants, and other enemies of their idea of a society based on ethnic purity, obedience to the church, and family values. They were almost invariably anti-Semitic. When Jewish army Captain Alfred Dreyfus was falsely accused of betraying his country in the notorious scandal of the 1890s, they were on the side of Dreyfus’s accusers. ---- Germany’s invasion of France in 1940 gave reactionaries of this kind the chance to form a French puppet-government in Vichy. Zemmour has had kind things to say about the Vichy regime. He also has expressed some doubt about the innocence of Dreyfus. ---- None of these views would be surprising if they came from a far-right agitator like Jean-Marie Le Pen. But Zemmour is the son of Sephardic Jewish immigrants from Algeria who lived among the Muslim Berbers."
Oct 27th 2021
EXTRACT: "performed strongly in last month’s parliamentary and regional elections. Officially, Communist Party candidates took 18.9% of the popular vote for the State Duma (parliament), compared to nearly 49.8% for the Kremlin’s United Russia party. But the Communists refused to recognize the results, insisting that the vote was rigged. And, indeed, some experts estimate that they should have gotten around 30% of the vote, with United Russia taking about 35%."
Oct 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Powell was charismatic in the true sense of the term. Nowadays, this description is too often used to indicate an ability to attract supporters or generate celebrity interest. Internet lists of those who are regarded as charismatic include characters as varied as Adolf Hitler, Bono, Donald Trump, George Clooney, and Rihanna. But the ancient Greeks and Saint Paul used “charisma” to describe values-based leadership infused with a charm capable of inspiring devotion. The Greeks believed that this quality was a gift of grace, while Christian theology regarded it as a power given by the Holy Spirit."
Oct 17th 2021
EXTRACTS: "But property-sector woes are not the only economic danger China faces in 2021-22. The Chinese government’s mounting crackdown on the country’s burgeoning tech sector may pose an even greater threat." ---- "According to a recent study by McKinsey & Company, the share of Chinese urban employment supported by private enterprises more than quadrupled between 1995 and 2018, from just 18% to 87%. The share of exports generated by the private sector more than doubled over the same period, from 34% to 88%. And private-sector fixed-asset investment jumped from 42% to 65% of the total. The message in the data is clear: clamping down on the private sector and threatening innovators is not the way to ensure sustained rapid growth. Chinese entrepreneurs can read the writing on the wall. They understand that their political and regulatory room to maneuver is shrinking, and that the balance has shifted in favor of state-owned firms and public officials. And they understand that this uneasy atmosphere is likely to persist."
Oct 16th 2021
EXTRACT: "We designed a programme that incorporated data from over 300 million buildings and analysed 130 million km² of land – almost the entire land surface area of the planet. This estimated how much energy could be produced from the 0.2 million km² of rooftops present on that land, an area roughly the same size as the UK."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "Britain in the 1950s was wedded to the US, acting as a partner rather than leading the charge. Now, while the UK continues to support the US, the influence it has seems negligible. While it may bring comfort to the UK to feel it is a partner to a superpower, being its stooge or subordinate is an unpleasant place to be, no matter how much you tell yourself it values your opinion."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "That was then. Now, the Chinese government has doubled down, with President Xi Jinping throwing the full force of his power into a “common prosperity” campaign aimed at addressing inequalities of income and wealth. Moreover, the regulatory net has been broadened, not just to ban cryptocurrencies, but also to become an instrument of social engineering, with the government adding e-cigarettes, business drinking, and celebrity fan culture to its ever-lengthening list of bad social habits. All this only compounds the concerns I raised two months ago. The new dual thrust of Chinese policy – redistribution plus re-regulation – strikes at the heart of the market-based “reform and opening up” that have underpinned China’s growth miracle since the days of Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s. It will subdue the entrepreneurial activity that has been so important in powering China’s dynamic private sector, with lasting consequences for the next, innovations-driven, phase of Chinese economic development. Without animal spirits, the case for indigenous innovation is in tatters."
Oct 5th 2021
EXTRACT: "Wartime nostalgia plays an important part in Britain’s instinctive fondness for the special relationship. Like former Prime Minister Tony Blair in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some British politicians might believe that the United Kingdom is the only European country with serious armed forces and the political will to use them. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, like Blair before him, seems to fancy himself a modern-day Churchill. Unfortunately (or not), Britain’s military power is insignificant compared to what Churchill could command in 1944. Wartime nostalgia has drawn Britain into several foolish American wars, which other European countries were wise to avoid."
Sep 24th 2021
EXTRACTS: "We have found that 47 million American adults – nearly 1 in 5 – agree with the statement that “the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.” Of those, 21 million also agree that “use of force is justified to restore Donald J. Trump to the presidency.” Our survey found that many of these 21 million people with insurrectionist sentiments have the capacity for violent mobilization. At least 7 million of them already own a gun, and at least 3 million have served in the U.S. military and so have lethal skills. Of those 21 million, 6 million said they supported right-wing militias and extremist groups, and 1 million said they are themselves or personally know a member of such a group, including the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys." ----- "..... the Jan. 6 insurrection represents a far more mainstream movement than earlier instances of right-wing extremism across the country. Those events, mostly limited to white supremacist and militia groups, saw more than 100 individuals arrested from 2015 to 2020. But just 14% of those arrested for their actions on Jan. 6 are members of those groups. More than half are business owners or middle-aged white-collar professionals, and only 7% are unemployed."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "That long path, though, has from the start had within it one fundamental flaw. If we are to make sense of wider global trends in insecurity, we have to recognise that in all the analysis around the 9/11 anniversary there lies the belief that the main security concern must be with an extreme version of Islam. It may seem a reasonable mistake, given the impact of the wars, but it still misses the point. The war on terror is better seen as one part of a global trend which goes well beyond a single religious tradition – a slow but steady move towards revolts from the margins."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACTS: "Is it not extraordinary that in a country that claims to be as enlightened and advanced as ours, the combined wealth of three individuals – Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and investor Warren Buffett – exceeds the total wealth of the bottom half of Americans? One has to return to the days of the pharaohs of Egypt to find a parallel to the extreme wealth inequality that we see in in America today." ...... "The top tax rate remained above 90 percent through the 1950s and did not dip below 70 percent until 1981. At no point during the decades that saw America’s greatest economic growth did the tax on the wealthy drop below 70 percent. Today it is somewhere around 37 percent. President Biden’s American Families Plan would increase the top tax rate to 39.6 percent – a fairly modest alteration, albeit in the right direction. It is true that there was a time when the top marginal tax was even lower than it is today: in the years leading up to the Great Depression it hovered around 25 percent."
Sep 7th 2021
EXTRACT: "But Biden can’t be blamed for the rise of the Taliban, or the fragile state of a country that has seen far too many wars and invasions. The US should not have been there in the first place, but that is a lesson that great powers never seem to learn."
Sep 4th 2021
EXTRACT: "The world is only starting to grapple with how profound the artificial-intelligence revolution will be. AI technologies will create waves of progress in critical infrastructure, commerce, transportation, health, education, financial markets, food production, and environmental sustainability. Successful adoption of AI will drive economies, reshape societies, and determine which countries set the rules for the coming century." ----- "AI will reorganize the world and change the course of human history. The democratic world must lead that process."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Although the Fed is considering tapering its quantitative easing (QE), it will likely remain dovish and behind the curve overall. Like most central banks, it has been lured into a “debt trap” by the surge in private and public liabilities (as a share of GDP) in recent years. Even if inflation stays higher than targeted, exiting QE too soon could cause bond, credit, and stock markets to crash. That would subject the economy to a hard landing, potentially forcing the Fed to reverse itself and resume QE." ---- "After all, that is what happened between the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, following the Fed’s previous attempt to raise rates and roll back QE."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Today’s economic challenges are certainly solvable, and there is no reason why inflation should have to spike."
Aug 27th 2021
EXTRACT: "To be sure, they have focused on their agenda, which is totally misguided—not by our own account but by the account of the majority of the American population, who view the Republican party as one that has lost its moral footing to the detriment of America’s future generations, who must now inherit the ugly consequences of a party that ran asunder."