Aug 14th 2012

Was Romney’s Ryan Pick Bold or Desperate?

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
Since Mitt Romney named Paul Ryan as his running-mate on Saturday, right wing pundits have done their best to frame his pick as a “bold” choice.  In fact, it appears to have been a choice born of the dawning realization at Romney’s high command, that his political situation was becoming increasingly desperate.
 
And the notion that Ryan himself is a “bold visionary” is nothing more than sheer fantasy – unless, of course, your “vision” of the future is the “Gilded Age”.
 
Before the announcement, conventional wisdom held that Romney would make a safe, boring choice for Vice President – somebody like Tim Pawlenty or Rob Portman.  The thought was that he would be cautious, both because he is, by nature, a cautious kind of guy – and because he was doing well enough that he didn’t want to make the a rash move that could blow up the way McCain’s decision to enlist Sarah Palin as his running mate exploded four years ago. 
 
But let’s face it, Romney was having a terrible summer. According to Nate Silver’s 538.com – the most sophisticated forecasting model around – Romney’s chance of winning this fall had dropped to under 30%.  His Las Vegas odds – and odds on the Intrade political market – weren’t much better.
 
Romney’s foreign trip was a disaster.  As much as anything it demonstrated that he lacks the most important single trait of successful political leaders: empathy.  Romney seems constitutionally incapable of putting himself in other people’s shoes.  He launched his expedition to Europe and Israel to demonstrate that he was a capable statesman, and looked instead like a bull in a china closet – insulting everyone in sight. Worse yet he looked out of his depth – like a student who was allowed to create his own SAT test and still failed to pass.  Or, as former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs put it – he looked like a guy who struck out at T-Ball.
 
His refusal to release his tax returns has continued to focus attention on Romney’s wealth – and the fact that in the one full year of returns he has opened to public scrutiny, he paid only a 13.9% effective tax rate makes it look like he plays by a different set of rules than ordinary mortals.  Matters got worse when the a non-partisan Brookings Institute Study found that his tax “reform” plan would increase the taxes of 95% of Americans, and give him – and millionaires like him – hundreds of thousands of additional tax breaks.
 
Romney’s history of outsourcing American jobs, his record at Bain Capital, his Swiss Bank Accounts and cash in the Caymans, have all begun to convince persuadable voters that he just isn’t on their side.  And it has become apparent that the more voters learn about his record as Governor of Massachusetts – 47th out of 50 in job creation – his claims to be an effective job creator were just so much hot air.
 
And finally there was the indisputable fact that Romney seems incapable of relating to ordinary Americans and their lives (e.g. “corporations are people too”, “Ann drives two Cadillacs”, “I love firing people”, etc.).
 
That’s not to say that Romney doesn’t still have a lot of chips on his side of the table.  The long recovery from the Great Recession – which was, of course, caused by precisely the same policies that Romney would like to revive – presents a headwind for President Obama.  And that headwind has been amplified by Republicans in Congress who have intentionally sabotaged the American economy for their own political advantage -- doing everything in their power to prevent passage of the infrastructure and jobs programs that independent analysts say would have created at least another million jobs.  
 
And, of course, there is the advantage bestowed by the unprecedented tsunami of money with which multi- millionaires like the Koch brothers and Sheldon Adelson hope to buy the outcome of the election.
 
In fact, a good case can be made that Romney still has a pretty good chance of beating the odds in November.  But the Romney campaign – and its super wealthy right wing supporters -- were starting to panic.  And the forces that wanted to bet the ranch on a real, radical right-wing take over of American government used that panic to successfully promote their choice of most right wing Vice Presidential candidate since 1900.  They convinced the campaign high command to double down on the view that this election is ultimately about mobilizing their base – and, they argued no one could do that better than Paul Ryan.
 
Ryan’s choice must have been controversial among Romney’s advisors.  Medicare is enormously popular in America – especially among senior citizens who make up a disproportionate percentage of the vote in swing states like Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa and Nevada.  Ryan is – after all – the leader of the movement that no kidding around, wants to abolish Medicare as we know it.  Presumably they believe that they can spend enough to confuse older voters into believing something different.  Don’t bet on it.
 
And the leaders of the Republican National Congressional Committee must be furious.  The choice of Ryan will nationalize the race for Congress and bring new focus on the dominant theme of many critical house races: Medicare, Medicare, Medicare.   It will also, allow President Obama to run against the physical embodiment of the obstructionist Republican Congress that has about a 15% approval rating.  It will make it easy for the Obama team to make the politically toxic Ryan budget a centerpiece of the race.  And, finally, perhaps most important, it virtually guarantees that the race will ultimately be viewed by many voters as a choice not simply a referendum on Obama’s performance or the economy.
 
But one thing is clear.  By choosing Ryan, Romney proved once and for all, that if he wins, right wing strategist Grover Norquist will have what he says wants: a President who has enough digits to sign whatever the Tea Party gang in Congress passes – a guy with no core values of his own who is perfectly willing to be led around by a ring in his nose to do whatever his right wing backers and the passionate partisans of the radical Tea Party in Congress demand of him.
 
Romney’s choice of Ryan proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that Mitt Romney will never revert to his “moderate” former self if he were elected President.  He, Paul Ryan, the Tea Party and his billionaire contributors will try to fundamentally transform America into a plutocracy that is of, by and for a tiny number of very wealthy families.
 
And the notion that Paul Ryan is a “bold visionary” – as his book  “Young Guns” would have us believe -- is simply laughable.
 
Is it “bold” to abolish Medicare, convert it into a voucher program, and raise the annual out of pocket health care spending of a senior citizen making $14,000 or $15,000 a year by $4,000 – just so you can give hundreds of thousands of dollars of additional tax breaks to the wealthiest people in America?  Outrageous, but not “bold” – unless you think that it’s “bold” for a street thug to steal a senior citizen’s purse – or a juice loan operator to prey on low income customers who are desperate for credit.
 
Robinhood was bold.  “Romneyhood” is not.  “Romneyhood” is about the strong victimizing the weak.  That’s not “bold”; that’s brazen.
 
And if you think abolishing Medicare is “visionary”, think again.  Republicans have been trying to get rid of Medicare since they opposed its passage in 1965.  It was former House Speaker Newt Gingrich who said he hoped it would “wither on the vine” two decades ago. 
 
Paul Ryan’s plan does not represent the future.  He represents the values and policies of the robber barons of the late 19th century.  He wants to go back to the discredited idea that tax cuts for the rich will trickle down to the rest of us – to the notion that we should allow the Wall Street Banks to run wild – ideas that caused the greatest financial collapse in 60 years and threatened the very existence of the American middle class.  Ryan and Romney are not “bold visionaries” – they are the “Go Back Team” that wants to return us to the warmed over, failed policies of the past.
 
And Ryan represents something even worse.  Romney is an unprincipled, willing vessel for any policy or position that will help him succeed – in business or in politics.  Ryan is a true believer.  He is a devotee of the radical libertarian philosophy that believes the highest value is selfishness – that greed is good – that society is better off, if first and foremost, we all look out for ourselves regardless of the consequences for everyone else. 
 
Over the weekend, the American Values Network put out a video and web site that demonstrates graphically the philosophy of the “visionary” Paul Ryan.  It includes footage of Paul Ryan praising the work of philosopher, author and libertarian icon, Ayn Rand, who died several years ago.
 
 Ryan says that “Ayn Rand, more than anyone else, did a fantastic job explaining the morality of capitalism, the morality of individualism…..If Ayn Rand were here today, I think she would do a great job in showing us just how wrong what government is doing, is.”
 
That footage follows excerpts from a famous Mike Wallace interview of Rand.    
In the Wallace interview, he asked Rand:
 
“Christ, and every other important moral leader in man’s history, has taught us that we should love one another.  Why then is this kind of love, in your mind, immoral?”
 
Rand responds, “It is immoral if it is placed above one’s own self.”
Ayn Rand says:
“What I am fighting is the idea that charity is a moral duty.”
“You love only those who deserve it.”
“Nobody has ever given a reason why man should be his brothers’ keeper.”

In his interview, Wallace asks Rand:   “You are out to destroy almost every edifice in contemporary American life – our Judeo-Christian religion, our modified government-regulated capitalism, rule by the majority will.  Other reviewers say that you scorn churches and the concept of God – are they accurate criticisms?”
 
Rand responds, “yes.”
 
Barack Obama and most Americans believe that we’re all in this together.  Paul Ryan and his sponsor Mitt Romney believe we’re all in this alone.
 
Barack Obama and most Americans believe we are our brother and sister’s keepers.  Most Americans believe that commitment to others, and devotion to our families, our community, our nation and to all of human kind, define what we mean by right and wrong.  Most Americans believe that we will succeed or fail together as a nation.  Most Americans believe in the military ethic that you never leave anyone behind.
 
Ryan and Romney believe that one’s highest calling is his own success – no matter what the consequence for anyone else.  
 
Those are exactly the values manifest in the stories of the workers who lost their jobs, their health insurance, and their pensions because Romney and his fellow investors at Bain Capital bought their companies, loaded them with debt, bled them dry to pay their fees and left them in bankruptcy while they walked away with millions.
 
They are the same values that lead Romney and Ryan to propose abolishing Medicare in order to fund additional tax breaks for themselves and the top 2% of the population.
 
Romney’s choice of Ryan is not bold at all, but it makes the choice facing America this fall crystal clear.
 
The election this fall is the most important single battle for the heart and soul of America that I have seen in the 45 years I have been involved in progressive politics.  This election, no one is mincing words.  We face a clear choice between two alternative visions of the kind of country we want to leave to our children.
 
Republican strategist chose Paul Ryan because they bet they could win this election by mobilizing their base.  They believe that progressives – and many of those who were inspired by Barack Obama in 2008 will be dispirited and uninvolved in 2012.  In the next 85 days, it’s up to us to prove them wrong.
 

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Apr 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "Some presidents indulge in the “Mount Rushmore syndrome” making an obvious effort to achieve greatness. Normally soft-spoken and apparently modest Biden is making his own bid for immortality."
Apr 9th 2021
EXTRACT: "New ways of thinking about the role of government are as important as new priorities. Many commentators have framed Biden’s infrastructure plan as a return to big government. But the package is spread over eight years, will raise public spending by only one percentage point of GDP, and is projected to pay for itself eventually. A boost in public investment in infrastructure, the green transition, and job creation is long overdue."
Apr 7th 2021
EXTRACT: " One can, and perhaps should, take the optimistic view that moral panics in the US blow over; reason will once again prevail. It could be that the Biden era will take the sting out of Trumpism, and the tolerance for which American intellectual life has often been admired will be reinvigorated. This might even happen while the noxious effects of American influence still rage in other countries. For the sake of America and the world, one can only hope it happens soon.  "
Mar 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "By refusing (despite having some good reasons) to end electoral gerrymandering, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has directly enabled the paralyzing hyper-partisanship that reached its nadir during Donald Trump’s presidency. By striking down all limits on corporate spending on political campaigns in the infamous 2010 Citizens United decision, he has helped to entrench dark money in US politics. And by gutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. Holder, Roberts has facilitated the racist voter-suppression tactics now being pursued in many Republican-controlled states."
Mar 24th 2021
EXTRACT: "the UK’s tough choices accumulate, and the problems lurking around the corner look menacing. Britain will have to make the best of Brexit. But it will be a long, hard struggle, all the more so with an evasive fabulist in charge."
Mar 15th 2021
EXTRACT: "Over the years, the approach of most American policymakers toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been Israel-centric with near total disregard for the suffering endured by the Palestinian people. The architects of policy in successive US administrations have discussed the conflict as if the fate of only one party (Israel) really mattered. Israelis were treated as full human beings with hopes and fears, while Palestinians were reduced to a problem that needed to be solved so that Israelis could live in peace and security.  ..... It is not just that Israelis and Palestinians haven’t been viewed with an equal measure of concern. It’s worse than that. It appears that Palestinians were judged as less ​human than Israelis, and were, therefore, not entitled to make demands to have their rights recognized and protected."
Mar 8th 2021
EXTRACTS: "XThere’s a global shortage in semiconductors, and it’s becoming increasingly serious." ...... "The automotive sector has been worst affected by the drought, in an era where microchips now form the backbone of most cars. Ford is predicting a 20% slump in production and Tesla shut down its model 3 assembly line for two weeks. In the UK, Honda was forced to temporarily shut its plant as well." ..... " As much as 70% of the world’s semiconductors are manufactured by just two companies, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) and Samsung."
Mar 5th 2021
EXTRACT: "Back in 1992, Lawrence H. Summers, then the chief economist at the World Bank, and I warned that pushing the US Federal Reserve’s annual inflation target down from 4% to 2% risked causing big problems. Not only was the 4% target not producing any discontent, but a 2% target would increase the risk of the Fed’s interest-rate policy hitting the zero lower bound. Our objections went unheeded. Fed Chair Alan Greenspan reduced the inflation target to 2%, and we have been paying for it ever since. I have long thought that many of our economic problems would go away if we could rejigger asset markets in such a way as to make a 5% federal funds rate consistent with full employment in the late stage of a business cycle."
Mar 2nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Under these conditions, the Fed is probably worried that markets will instantly crash if it takes away the punch bowl. And with the increase in public and private debt preventing the eventual monetary normalization, the likelihood of stagflation in the medium term – and a hard landing for asset markets and economies – continues to increase."
Mar 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Massive fiscal and monetary stimulus programs in the United States and other advanced economies are fueling a raging debate about whether higher inflation could be just around the corner. Ten-year US Treasury yields and mortgage rates are already climbing in anticipation that the US Federal Reserve – the de facto global central bank – will be forced to hike rates, potentially bursting asset-price bubbles around the world. But while markets are probably overstating short-term inflation risks for 2021, they do not yet fully appreciate the longer-term dangers."
Feb 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "To be sure, calls to “build back better” from the pandemic imply some awareness of the need for systemic change. But the transformation we need extends beyond constructing modern infrastructure or unlocking private investment in any one country. We need to re-orient – indeed, re-invent – global politics, so that countries can cooperate far more effectively in creating a better world."
Feb 23rd 2021
EXTRACT: "So, notwithstanding the predictable release of pent-up demand for consumer durables, face-to-face services show clear evidence – in terms of both consumer demand and employment – of permanent scarring. Consequently, with the snapback of pent-up demand for durables nearing its point of exhaustion, the recovery of the post-pandemic US economy is likely to fall well short of vaccine development’s “warp speed.” "
Feb 20th 2021
EXTRACT: "Human rights abuses under Erdogan are beyond the pale of inhumanity and moral decadence. The list of Erdogan’s violations and cruelty is too long to numerate. The detention and horrifying torture of thousands of innocent people for months and at times for years, without being charged, is hard to fathom. Many prisoners are left languishing in dark cells, often in solitary confinement. The detention of tens of thousands of men and hundreds of women, many with their children, especially following the 2016 failed coup, has become common. It is calculated to inflict horrendous pain and suffering to bring the prisoners to the breaking point, so that they confess to crimes they have never committed."
Feb 20th 2021
Courtyard of the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, circa 1670, (Job Adriaenszoon Berckheyde).
Feb 12th 2021
EXTRACT: "Global regulators will no doubt be concerned about a potential volatility spillover from digital asset prices into traditional capital markets. They may not permit what could quickly amount to effective proxy approval by the back door for companies holding large proportions of a volatile asset on their balance sheets."
Feb 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "Since Russians began protesting opposition leader Alexei Navalny’s imprisonment, the security forces have apparently had carte blanche to arrest demonstrators – and they have done so by the thousands. If Russians so much as honk their car horns in solidarity with the protesters, they risk personal repercussions. The official response to the protests goes beyond the Kremlin’s past repression. It is war."
Feb 6th 2021
EXTRACT: ".......like Biden, Roosevelt was certainly no revolutionary. His task was to save American capitalism. He was a repairer, a fixer. The New Deal was achieved not because of Roosevelt’s genius or heroism, but because enough people trusted him to act in good faith. That is precisely what people are expecting from Biden, too. He must save US democracy from the ravages of a political crisis. To do so, he must reestablish trust in the system. He has promised to make his country less polarized, and to restore civility and truth to political discourse. In this endeavor, his lack of charisma may turn out to be his greatest strength. For all that he lacks in grandeur, he makes up for by exuding an air of decency."
Feb 2nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Europe must not lose sight of the long game, which inevitably will center on China, not Russia or relations with post-Brexit Britain. China is already establishing a presence in Iran, and demonstrating that it has the capital, know-how, and technology to project power and influence beyond its borders. Should it succeed in turning the Belt and Road Initiative into a line of geopolitical stepping-stones, it might soon emerge at Europe’s southeastern border in a form that no one in the EU foresaw."
Jan 29th 2021
EXTRACT: "One sign of this change is that, unlike all recent Democratic administrations, Biden’s hasn’t paid obeisance to Wall Street by giving bankers top jobs. The new Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, is a former Federal Reserve chair and academic who has made it clear that she understands the country’s pressing social needs. Moreover, Biden consulted Warren on her economic views, and has named a former Warren adviser as Yellen’s deputy. Yellen’s appointment demonstrates that Biden shares the insight that enabled Trump’s rise: that too many Americans feel that they cannot get a fair share. "
Jan 24th 2021
EXTRACT: "Barack Obama cautioned in his final speech as president that, “Our democracy is threatened whenever we take it for granted.” Yet isn’t that exactly what America has been doing? In a decade punctuated by the global financial crisis, the COVID-19 crisis, a racial-justice crisis, an inequality crisis, and now a political crisis, we have only paid lip service to lofty democratic ideals. ... Sadly, this complacency has come at a time of growing fragility for the American experiment. Internet-enabled connectivity is dangerously amplifying an increasingly polarized national discourse in an era of mounting social and political instability. The resulting vulnerability was brought into painfully sharp focus on January 6. The stewardship of democracy is at grave risk. "