Jan 26th 2010

Why It is in the Political Interest of Democrats to Finish Comprehensive Health Care Reform

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
The frustration and disappointment is palpable among Democratic Members of Congress and staff. After nine months of difficult political labor, they were days from passing legislation that Presidents have unsuccessfully sought for half a century.

Then came the political disaster in Massachusetts. For many Democrats, last week was like living through The Empire Strikes Back. Of course we must all remember how that trilogy ultimately turned out.

Regardless, there are those who don't want to sit through a whole new episode, who simply want the health care debate to go away, to move on to something else and forget they even tried. That would be a terrible political mistake for swing district Democrats. Here's why:

1). Millions of dollars of advertising from the insurance industry and Chamber of Commerce have convinced large numbers of voters that the general concept of health care reform is a bad idea
. But it has done nothing to turn them against the underlying elements of the bill. Americans still strongly support ending the insurance industry's ability to deny claims because of pre-existing conditions; forcing insurance companies to use most of their revenue for health care instead of profits or CEO pay; providing affordable coverage for all Americans; ending the "donut hole" in pharmaceutical coverage for seniors; and reining in the power of the insurance industry.

If Democrats stop now, swing voters will continue to believe that the Democratic health care initiative was a bad idea. The only way they will change their minds is if health insurance reform passes, and they begin to see some of the benefits for themselves - and, just as important - see that the sky doesn't fall.

History shows that every major piece of social or economic legislation has increased in popularity once it is passed.

If comprehensive health care reform is passed this spring, it will rapidly increase in popularity between passage and next fall's elections. That is particularly important for all the House and Senate Members in swing districts, since it will improve the general political environment and improve the popular perception of the votes many swing Members have already taken on health care reform.

2).
The fact is that if Democrats don't pass a bill, swing members will be stuck with all of the negatives of voting for the bill - and none of the benefits of passing it. Republicans will advertise ad nauseum about how Congressman X voted for "Obamacare" but they won't get the credit from those who favored the bill, since it never passed into law.
When I was 16 years old, it snowed in my hometown of Shreveport, Louisiana. When it snows in Shreveport, everything stops and the schools let out. Well, this snowstorm happened right in the middle of Mardi Gras, so a friend and I set off on the train to stay with his brother in New Orleans and partake in the Mardi Gras fun.

In the course of that trip, we were naïvely - and with wide eyes - walking down Bourbon Street, when a big hawker at a strip joint said something that taught me an important lesson in life and politics. He said: "Come on in, sonny, they're going to say you did anyway."
Two hundred and nineteen House Members and Sixty Democratic Senators all voted for health care reform. No matter what happens Republicans will try to attack them for their vote. Might as well have a major political accomplishment to show for it.

3). Voters like winners - not losers. They don't want to hang out with losers, and they don't want to support them. If the Democrats - after working for months on health insurance reform - can't get it over the finish line, the voters will write them off as losers and be less prone to give them their vote.
Being a winner is an independent variable in politics. Once Massachusetts voters heard that Martha Coakley was a likely loser they began to desert her in droves. And the same thing works in reverse. Barack Obama got a huge boost when he won the Iowa caucuses. Part of that was simply because he was viewed as a winner.

4).
Voters don't like cowards. Nobody likes the guy who blows the World Series taking a strike instead of swinging at the ball. It would be one thing if Democrats fight tooth and nail to pass a final bill, and go down swinging. It's another thing if they don't even try.

5). Americans are welling over with frustration that government can't get anything done to benefit their lives.
As far as most Americans are concerned, Democrats are in charge of Government. That means Democrats have to deliver real progress.
If Democrats don't pass comprehensive health insurance reform, we will look like more than just losers and cowards - we will look incompetent. Now that would not be a fair characterization. Reforming one-sixth of the economy is a huge undertaking. That President Obama and the Democrats have made it this far is an enormous accomplishment. But that won't count for anything among the voters. They want us to deliver.

6). Passing comprehensive health care reform would be a big accomplishment not only for Congress, but for the Obama Administration. History shows clearly that the popularity of the President is the major factor affecting the number of Members of Congress from a sitting President's party that lose in mid-term elections.

The failure of the health care reform effort in 1993 led directly to the Democratic loss of the House the following year.

If you are a Democratic Member of Congress facing a tough race, there are very few things you can do that are more important to your re-election than voting to make sure that Congress finishes health care reform.
And there is a clear route to accomplish that goal. Two days before the disaster in
Massachusetts, the House and Senate leadership had come to a virtual agreement on the final shape of health care reform.

Members of both chambers should pass that agreement. The only issue should be the procedure used. Basically, it will likely involve the House simultaneously passing the Senate bill and a "patch bill" that will incorporate the changes made during the negotiations. That "patch bill" will have to be passed in the Senate (before or after the House acts) through the "budget reconciliation" process that is not subject to filibuster.

Members do not need to worry that this will be viewed as "jamming" the bill through. Any bill that is passed by a majority of both houses is not "jammed" through. It is passed through a democratic process. What is undemocratic is the 60-vote filibuster rule that allows a minority to thwart the will of the majority.

And from a political point of view, no one ever remembers the "procedures" that were used to pass a major piece of legislation anyway
. It will ultimately be evaluated based only on the impact it has on real people's lives in the real world.
While we're at it, let's forget all the talk about a "scaled-back" bill of "market reforms." If
you ban the use of pre-existing conditions to deny care - which is the main market reform - without requiring everyone to have insurance, you encourage people to wait until they are sick to get health insurance. If that were to happen, the price of insurance would skyrocket, and even fewer people yet would buy insurance until they needed it. The effect would be a vicious cycle of rising premiums, and fewer and fewer people with coverage.

To have insurance "market reforms" everyone must be covered. To assure that, we have to provide subsidies and regulate insurance companies to make sure that insurance is affordable. That means you need comprehensive reform.

The leadership of the House and Senate - and the President - are all committed to finishing health care reform. Now, each and every Member needs to look carefully at his or her own political self-interest and figure out a way to get it done. And while they're thinking, they need to think about how their grandchildren will feel one day, if they are on the wrong side of history.

Robert Creamer's recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on Amazon.com.

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Apr 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "Some presidents indulge in the “Mount Rushmore syndrome” making an obvious effort to achieve greatness. Normally soft-spoken and apparently modest Biden is making his own bid for immortality."
Apr 9th 2021
EXTRACT: "New ways of thinking about the role of government are as important as new priorities. Many commentators have framed Biden’s infrastructure plan as a return to big government. But the package is spread over eight years, will raise public spending by only one percentage point of GDP, and is projected to pay for itself eventually. A boost in public investment in infrastructure, the green transition, and job creation is long overdue."
Apr 7th 2021
EXTRACT: " One can, and perhaps should, take the optimistic view that moral panics in the US blow over; reason will once again prevail. It could be that the Biden era will take the sting out of Trumpism, and the tolerance for which American intellectual life has often been admired will be reinvigorated. This might even happen while the noxious effects of American influence still rage in other countries. For the sake of America and the world, one can only hope it happens soon.  "
Mar 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "By refusing (despite having some good reasons) to end electoral gerrymandering, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., has directly enabled the paralyzing hyper-partisanship that reached its nadir during Donald Trump’s presidency. By striking down all limits on corporate spending on political campaigns in the infamous 2010 Citizens United decision, he has helped to entrench dark money in US politics. And by gutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. Holder, Roberts has facilitated the racist voter-suppression tactics now being pursued in many Republican-controlled states."
Mar 24th 2021
EXTRACT: "the UK’s tough choices accumulate, and the problems lurking around the corner look menacing. Britain will have to make the best of Brexit. But it will be a long, hard struggle, all the more so with an evasive fabulist in charge."
Mar 15th 2021
EXTRACT: "Over the years, the approach of most American policymakers toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been Israel-centric with near total disregard for the suffering endured by the Palestinian people. The architects of policy in successive US administrations have discussed the conflict as if the fate of only one party (Israel) really mattered. Israelis were treated as full human beings with hopes and fears, while Palestinians were reduced to a problem that needed to be solved so that Israelis could live in peace and security.  ..... It is not just that Israelis and Palestinians haven’t been viewed with an equal measure of concern. It’s worse than that. It appears that Palestinians were judged as less ​human than Israelis, and were, therefore, not entitled to make demands to have their rights recognized and protected."
Mar 8th 2021
EXTRACTS: "XThere’s a global shortage in semiconductors, and it’s becoming increasingly serious." ...... "The automotive sector has been worst affected by the drought, in an era where microchips now form the backbone of most cars. Ford is predicting a 20% slump in production and Tesla shut down its model 3 assembly line for two weeks. In the UK, Honda was forced to temporarily shut its plant as well." ..... " As much as 70% of the world’s semiconductors are manufactured by just two companies, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) and Samsung."
Mar 5th 2021
EXTRACT: "Back in 1992, Lawrence H. Summers, then the chief economist at the World Bank, and I warned that pushing the US Federal Reserve’s annual inflation target down from 4% to 2% risked causing big problems. Not only was the 4% target not producing any discontent, but a 2% target would increase the risk of the Fed’s interest-rate policy hitting the zero lower bound. Our objections went unheeded. Fed Chair Alan Greenspan reduced the inflation target to 2%, and we have been paying for it ever since. I have long thought that many of our economic problems would go away if we could rejigger asset markets in such a way as to make a 5% federal funds rate consistent with full employment in the late stage of a business cycle."
Mar 2nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Under these conditions, the Fed is probably worried that markets will instantly crash if it takes away the punch bowl. And with the increase in public and private debt preventing the eventual monetary normalization, the likelihood of stagflation in the medium term – and a hard landing for asset markets and economies – continues to increase."
Mar 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Massive fiscal and monetary stimulus programs in the United States and other advanced economies are fueling a raging debate about whether higher inflation could be just around the corner. Ten-year US Treasury yields and mortgage rates are already climbing in anticipation that the US Federal Reserve – the de facto global central bank – will be forced to hike rates, potentially bursting asset-price bubbles around the world. But while markets are probably overstating short-term inflation risks for 2021, they do not yet fully appreciate the longer-term dangers."
Feb 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "To be sure, calls to “build back better” from the pandemic imply some awareness of the need for systemic change. But the transformation we need extends beyond constructing modern infrastructure or unlocking private investment in any one country. We need to re-orient – indeed, re-invent – global politics, so that countries can cooperate far more effectively in creating a better world."
Feb 23rd 2021
EXTRACT: "So, notwithstanding the predictable release of pent-up demand for consumer durables, face-to-face services show clear evidence – in terms of both consumer demand and employment – of permanent scarring. Consequently, with the snapback of pent-up demand for durables nearing its point of exhaustion, the recovery of the post-pandemic US economy is likely to fall well short of vaccine development’s “warp speed.” "
Feb 20th 2021
EXTRACT: "Human rights abuses under Erdogan are beyond the pale of inhumanity and moral decadence. The list of Erdogan’s violations and cruelty is too long to numerate. The detention and horrifying torture of thousands of innocent people for months and at times for years, without being charged, is hard to fathom. Many prisoners are left languishing in dark cells, often in solitary confinement. The detention of tens of thousands of men and hundreds of women, many with their children, especially following the 2016 failed coup, has become common. It is calculated to inflict horrendous pain and suffering to bring the prisoners to the breaking point, so that they confess to crimes they have never committed."
Feb 20th 2021
Courtyard of the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, circa 1670, (Job Adriaenszoon Berckheyde).
Feb 12th 2021
EXTRACT: "Global regulators will no doubt be concerned about a potential volatility spillover from digital asset prices into traditional capital markets. They may not permit what could quickly amount to effective proxy approval by the back door for companies holding large proportions of a volatile asset on their balance sheets."
Feb 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "Since Russians began protesting opposition leader Alexei Navalny’s imprisonment, the security forces have apparently had carte blanche to arrest demonstrators – and they have done so by the thousands. If Russians so much as honk their car horns in solidarity with the protesters, they risk personal repercussions. The official response to the protests goes beyond the Kremlin’s past repression. It is war."
Feb 6th 2021
EXTRACT: ".......like Biden, Roosevelt was certainly no revolutionary. His task was to save American capitalism. He was a repairer, a fixer. The New Deal was achieved not because of Roosevelt’s genius or heroism, but because enough people trusted him to act in good faith. That is precisely what people are expecting from Biden, too. He must save US democracy from the ravages of a political crisis. To do so, he must reestablish trust in the system. He has promised to make his country less polarized, and to restore civility and truth to political discourse. In this endeavor, his lack of charisma may turn out to be his greatest strength. For all that he lacks in grandeur, he makes up for by exuding an air of decency."
Feb 2nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Europe must not lose sight of the long game, which inevitably will center on China, not Russia or relations with post-Brexit Britain. China is already establishing a presence in Iran, and demonstrating that it has the capital, know-how, and technology to project power and influence beyond its borders. Should it succeed in turning the Belt and Road Initiative into a line of geopolitical stepping-stones, it might soon emerge at Europe’s southeastern border in a form that no one in the EU foresaw."
Jan 29th 2021
EXTRACT: "One sign of this change is that, unlike all recent Democratic administrations, Biden’s hasn’t paid obeisance to Wall Street by giving bankers top jobs. The new Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, is a former Federal Reserve chair and academic who has made it clear that she understands the country’s pressing social needs. Moreover, Biden consulted Warren on her economic views, and has named a former Warren adviser as Yellen’s deputy. Yellen’s appointment demonstrates that Biden shares the insight that enabled Trump’s rise: that too many Americans feel that they cannot get a fair share. "
Jan 24th 2021
EXTRACT: "Barack Obama cautioned in his final speech as president that, “Our democracy is threatened whenever we take it for granted.” Yet isn’t that exactly what America has been doing? In a decade punctuated by the global financial crisis, the COVID-19 crisis, a racial-justice crisis, an inequality crisis, and now a political crisis, we have only paid lip service to lofty democratic ideals. ... Sadly, this complacency has come at a time of growing fragility for the American experiment. Internet-enabled connectivity is dangerously amplifying an increasingly polarized national discourse in an era of mounting social and political instability. The resulting vulnerability was brought into painfully sharp focus on January 6. The stewardship of democracy is at grave risk. "