Jan 27th 2014

Why the United States is Not Greece or Italy – And Shouldn’t Act like It

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
In the run-up to the Super Committee deadline, the news is filled with headlines about the potential default of Greece and Italy on their government debts. 
Some might think that these developments highlight the need for draconian austerity measures in the U.S. to prevent us from suffering a similar fate. The Republican Party claims that “our debt has put us on the same path as Greece.”  They would be wrong.
To see just how wrong, all you need do is look at the difference in what the U.S. Government is paying to borrow money today – and the rates being charged to Greece and Italy.  Last week the financial markets demanded 7% interest rates on 10-year Italian bonds. That ultimately forced the passage of unpopular austerity measures, and the resignation of Prime Minister Berlusconi.  Similarly onerous interest rates forced out Greek Prime Minister Papandreou several weeks ago.
Meanwhile, the yield on 10-year bonds has been at near-record lows – around 2% throughout the summer.  And 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds yields have hovered around 3%.
What explains the difference?
Is it the “excessive” social benefits offered by Greece and Italy? 
As economist Paul Krugman points out, there is no relation whatsoever between the level of social benefits and the interest rates demanded by financial markets. 
Of course all European countries offer substantially more generous social benefits to their citizens than does the United States – including universal health care.  But Italy and Greece do not have bigger welfare states than other countries that are doing quite well financially.  Before the crisis, social expenditure spending was lower in Greece and Italy than it was in Germany – and a good deal lower than in Sweden where GDP has been growing throughout the crisis.
Meanwhile, Canada, which has universal health care and much more robust social safety net programs than the United States, did a much better job weathering the financial crisis of 2008 and the years since than did the United States.
No, other factors are at work here.
Fundamentally --no matter what Standard and Poor’s says about the unreliability of the Federal Government’s financial decision-making --world financial markets still consider U.S. Treasury Notes the safest investment in the world.  In fact, in a perverse sense, troubles elsewhere make U.S. Treasuries more attractive. 
Whatever you think about the issues underlying the European financial market crisis, its facts simply cannot be denied.  The numbers are there for everyone to see.
There are a number of key factors that contribute to the relative security of U.S. Treasuries– and they are likely to make it so well into the future.
The critical difference between the financial structure of the United States and Europe is that we have our own national currency, and the countries of the Eurozone do not.
In the United States, Congress, as dysfunctional as it sometimes is, provides a mechanism to forge a nationwide fiscal policy.  Europe, where most fiscal decisions are made at the national levels, has no comparable mechanism. What you get instead is a hodge-podge of policies – what you’d have gotten in the U.S. if we had kept the Articles of Confederation rather than the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. Constitution not only gives the United States the ability to decide – country-wide – how much the largest player in the Government bond market will borrow.  It also gives us the ability to handle differences in the economic circumstances of our states without threatening the collapse of the entire national economy – or the financial system --and to prevent the internal political problems that result.
Economic problems in Mississippi do not require, for instance, that the government of New York vote to “bail out” Mississippi.  In Europe, the other governments of the Eurozone – especially Germany and France – had to make that very unpopular political decision.
While the common European currency worked fine so long as the zone – and the world – experienced sustained growth, the lack of common fiscal policy makes it particularly vulnerable in periods of economic stagnation or recession.  And it deprives the Eurozone of the fiscal and monetary tools to dampen the effects of recessionary economic forces.
In a period of recession or economic stagnation there is a natural and desirable increase in government debt as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), since there are more demands on governmental social safety net programs – and less tax revenue.
That increase in government deficit spending offsets the decreased private economic demand that is the root cause of recessions.   It provides an important means of ending the downward recessionary spiral – preventing depression – and restoring an economy to long-term economic growth.
In the United States, as deficits increase during a recession, the Federal Reserve has the ability to increase the money supply and keep interests rates low – in both the markets for private and for government debt.
Because the U.S. has its own currency – and because much of the world’s transactions are denominated in dollars – our government can borrow money denominated in our own currency and control overall interest rates in our economy.
In the United States, the Federal Reserve has the ability to “monetize” the federal debt.  It can directly purchase government bonds without having to borrow the money to pay for them. That helps drive down interest rates on government or private debt by expanding the money supply – by “printing money.”
The power – and willingness – of the Federal Reserve to control interest rates and the money supply – is a critical factor that helps make U.S. Government debt such a safe bet to private investors.  Investors who buy U.S. Government bonds are much less prone to panic if they know that the Fed can step in to provide a market for U.S. government debt.
The system has some of the same effect on financial markets as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation does on bank depositors. There are less likely to be run on a bank that causes it to go out of business, if you know that the FDIC will cover your losses if there ever is a bank collapse.  That in turn becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy – fewer banks collapse because there are fewer bank panics, or runs on the bank.
In the case of the Fed’s ability to buy government bonds, a run on U.S. Treasury bonds is less likely because the Fed can – and will – step in to stabilize the government bond market.
Not so in Europe.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is forbidden by its charter from buying  government bonds directly from participating countries.  And it has been unwilling to take the intermediary step of buying large numbers of government bonds on the private market. 
To make matters worse, none of the participating countries has any direct control over the value of its own currency whatsoever. 
In a recession, when the percentage of Government debt to GDP goes up automatically, that makes it impossible for any individual government – like Greece or Italy – to “monetize” its government debt.  They have given up the power to do so to the European Central Bank that is controlled by all of Europe, and as a practical matter, by the biggest players and particularly Germany.    Each individual country has zero ability to independently control interest rates in its own economy.
There have been growing calls in Europe to change the ECB charter – or at the least for the ECB to intervene forcefully in the private market for government bonds and hence “monetize” the debts of member countries by increasing the overall money supply in Europe.    Without this kind of backing Eurozone member country debt is ripe for speculative panic and attack.   If the ECB took this kind of action, the European “financial crisis” would likely end. 
Or as the New York Times analyst Jack Ewing wrote this morning, “What markets want to hear, though, is not only prescriptions for long–term overhauls but also assurances that the central bank will do whatever it takes to prevent near-term panic.”
In fact, you could argue that much of this “crisis” has in fact been manufactured by “austerity hawks” in Europe who want to use market pressure to force austerity measures on member governments.  In fact, last week the ECB actually cut its overall purchases of government bonds on the private market at precisely the time that Italy’s bonds were spiking to 7%.  Jens Weidmann, head of the German Bundesbank and German representative to the ECB governing board is quoted in Tuesday’s Washington Post arguing that the ECB “cannot and should not solve the financial problems of states.”
Europe faces another problem we don’t have in the United States. If countries that control their own fiscal and monetary policy have their own currencies, then economic imbalances between them often appear in changes in the values of those currencies relative to each other.  That’s true at least if they are allowed to float on world currency markets.  Note that one of the big disputes between the U.S. and China today is that the Chinese don’t allow their own currency to float relative to the dollar, resulting in relatively lower prices for Chinese goods in the U.S. and higher prices for U.S. goods in China.
But when different countries without common fiscal or monetary policies have a common currency, those economic imbalances aren’t reflected in the value of discreet currencies – since all of those countries have the same currency with one value against all others.  The result is that these imbalances come out in other ways. We’re seeing one of those in the default crisis in the Eurozone.
In addition, the European banking system is more fragile and vulnerable to market fluctuations because bank regulators in Europe have been less prone to demand higher capital requirements for European banks than regulators in the U.S. – despite heavy lobbying aimed at their European counterparts by the Obama Administration. That creates yet another factor enhancing the instability of Eurozone finances.
Finally, the Congressional Budget Office’s baseline estimate is that public debt in the United States will rise to and level off at no more than 74% of GDP.  The CIA world fact book estimates that last year public debt hit 142% of GDP in Greece and 119 % of GDP in Italy.
The level of public debt in the United States is qualitatively lower than it is in Greece and Italy.
As a result of all of these factors, the United States is not facing imminent default or exploding interest rates on government debt.  But the European crisis – and the potential reaction of the media, the Super Committee and other elites in the United States – could endanger us greatly. 
Of course a full out meltdown of the European financial system would send shock waves throughout the world economy.  That could be the result of the brinksmanship being played by Europe’s “austerity hawks.”
But if the “austerity hawks” are successful at forcing more draconian cutbacks, that will have bad consequences as well.
For decades, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has preached the need for fiscal constraint and austerity. According to the Washington Post, now even the IMF is warning that, “austerity may trigger a new recession,” and is urging countries to look for ways to boost growth.
Because they have no Eurozone-wide fiscal policy, countries in Europe like Greece and Italy are forced into “austerity” policies by the financial sector to avoid default.  That will simply make matters worse in the near term, and certainly over the long run.
Not one of the European countries that has tried to cut its way out of recession has been successful.  In Ireland, where government spending was slashed to appease financial markets, unemployment is now 14% and interest rates on Irish bonds are higher than Italy’s – about 8%.
If you want to lay a foundation for long-term economic growth in Europe or America, the last thing you would do is reduce the income going to ordinary citizens – even over the long run.  That’s not the problem – just the opposite.  The concentration of economic wealth in the top 1% prevents everyday consumers from having the money to buy the goods and services that an increasingly productive economy produce. We do not need ordinary people to “share in the sacrifice.”  We need policies that will increase the share of income going to ordinary people to reduce the exploding inequality between the 99% and the 1%.  
And it is critical to remember that in the end, economics is not about interest rates, or even prices or trade flows. These are just means to an end. 
Economics is ultimately about two things:
·      The production of goods and services by living, breathing human beings.
·      The distribution of those goods and services among the population.
The United States has a talented, willing workforce with abundant natural resources.  Our problem is not our inability to produce a bigger economic pie.  It is that the system that organizes the workforce – and deploys those resources -- has broken down.  As a result, one out of ten Americans who wants to work can’t find an organization that will deploy their talent and time to produce goods and services.
That system has not broken down because we spend too much on government.  It has broken down because there is not enough economic demand to incentivize private employers to hire workers.  Business doesn’t need more “confidence,” it needs more customers.
To get the economies of the U.S. and Europe moving again, government needs to step in to provide that demand – to jumpstart economic activity.  We do not need an “austerity proposal” from the Super Committee.  We do need to pass the American Jobs Act.
We know this is true from everything in economic history.  And we can’t afford to be confused by ideologues from the right who demand that we “cut government spending” so we won’t be “like” Greece or Italy.

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Dec 4th 2021
EXTRACT: "In contrast to the index for consumer goods, which measures only the prices of final products, industrial producer prices capture all intermediate stages of production. They therefore have a certain prognostic significance for consumer prices, even though the final products won’t show such extreme spikes. ----- These new inflation figures are so extreme that the ECB’s position looks like willful denial. Germany is currently experiencing the strongest inflation in a lifetime. And the situation is not much better in other European countries. In September, France reported an 11.6% annual increase in industrial producer prices, and that figure stood at 15.6% in Italy, 18.1% in Finland, 21.4% in the Netherlands, and 23.6% in Spain."
Nov 30th 2021
EXTRACT: "So it could well be that, despite the faster spread of the infection, its ultimate health, social and economic impact proves negligible. We simply do not know at this point. But detecting more uncertainty than before, financial markets have reacted with panic. For example, the S&P500 tumbled 2.3% on Friday November 26 only to rise 1.1% on Monday November 29. Most markets gave up between 2% and 4%, which is a pretty substantial one-day fall."
Nov 28th 2021
EXTRACT: "Momentous changes are casting a long shadow on China. The country’s political system will soon undergo a profound reform, pending final approval (a quasi-formality) at next year’s congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC). President Xi Jinping, the Party chairman and the “navigator” of the country, has decided on a new course, abandoning the principle of collective leadership. Xi is leading China away from the path taken by Deng Xiaoping after the terror of the Cultural Revolution, and back toward a system of absolute rule by one person without term limits, as under Mao Zedong."
Nov 25th 2021
EXTRACTS: "”The biggest disappointment in Glasgow was the last-minute watering down of the proposed (and widely supported) agreement to “phase out” the use of coal in energy production. With India providing political cover for China in vetoing this language, the final conference proposal was to “phase down” coal”. ---- “China accounts for more than half of the world’s coal consumption, and has the largest amount of coal-fired generating capacity under construction. Pressed about why his country would not do more in Glasgow to help save the planet, China’s chief negotiator pointed to the commitments in the Communist Party of China’s current Five-Year Plan. So, our future now depends on the CPC’s program. The tragedy for the world is that the Party cannot be phased down, much less phased out, despite the fact that it is a huge threat to the future of all of us.” ------ “To save the planet, robust democratic leadership must be phased up – not phased down, let alone phased out. Rather than merely keeping our fingers crossed and hoping for the best, we should start by calling out the appalling behavior of dictatorships such as China and Russia.”
Nov 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "The transitory inflation debate in the United States is over. The upsurge in US inflation has turned into something far worse than the Federal Reserve expected. Perpetually optimistic financial markets are taking this largely in stride. The Fed is widely presumed to have both the wisdom and the firepower to keep underlying inflation in check. That remains to be seen."
Nov 14th 2021
EXTRACT: "S&P projects that companies are planning to install 44 gigawatts of new solar in 2022. The year 2020, despite the onset of the pandemic, saw a record-breaking 19 gigawatts of new solar capacity installed in the U.S. So given the bids out there already, it appears that in 2022 solar installers will more than double their best year ever so far. The U.S. currently has 100 gigawatts of solar electricity-generating capacity, so in just one year we are poised to add nearly 50% of our current total. A gigawatt of power can provide electricity to about 750,000 homes. So the 44 new gigawatts we’ll put in next year have a nameplate capacity that would under ideal conditions allow them to power 33 million homes." ----- "Not only is there a lot of good news on the green energy front but there is good news in the bad news for fossil fuels. S&P finds that coal plants are being retired way before the utilities had expected. Some 29 gigawatts of coal retirements are expected from 2020 through 2025. "
Nov 3rd 2021
EXTRACT: "Zemmour’s way of thinking stems from a tradition going back to the French Revolution of 1789. Catholic conservatives and right-wing intellectuals, who hated the secular republic that emerged from the revolution, have long fulminated against liberals, cosmopolitans, immigrants, and other enemies of their idea of a society based on ethnic purity, obedience to the church, and family values. They were almost invariably anti-Semitic. When Jewish army Captain Alfred Dreyfus was falsely accused of betraying his country in the notorious scandal of the 1890s, they were on the side of Dreyfus’s accusers. ---- Germany’s invasion of France in 1940 gave reactionaries of this kind the chance to form a French puppet-government in Vichy. Zemmour has had kind things to say about the Vichy regime. He also has expressed some doubt about the innocence of Dreyfus. ---- None of these views would be surprising if they came from a far-right agitator like Jean-Marie Le Pen. But Zemmour is the son of Sephardic Jewish immigrants from Algeria who lived among the Muslim Berbers."
Oct 27th 2021
EXTRACT: "performed strongly in last month’s parliamentary and regional elections. Officially, Communist Party candidates took 18.9% of the popular vote for the State Duma (parliament), compared to nearly 49.8% for the Kremlin’s United Russia party. But the Communists refused to recognize the results, insisting that the vote was rigged. And, indeed, some experts estimate that they should have gotten around 30% of the vote, with United Russia taking about 35%."
Oct 22nd 2021
EXTRACT: "Powell was charismatic in the true sense of the term. Nowadays, this description is too often used to indicate an ability to attract supporters or generate celebrity interest. Internet lists of those who are regarded as charismatic include characters as varied as Adolf Hitler, Bono, Donald Trump, George Clooney, and Rihanna. But the ancient Greeks and Saint Paul used “charisma” to describe values-based leadership infused with a charm capable of inspiring devotion. The Greeks believed that this quality was a gift of grace, while Christian theology regarded it as a power given by the Holy Spirit."
Oct 17th 2021
EXTRACTS: "But property-sector woes are not the only economic danger China faces in 2021-22. The Chinese government’s mounting crackdown on the country’s burgeoning tech sector may pose an even greater threat." ---- "According to a recent study by McKinsey & Company, the share of Chinese urban employment supported by private enterprises more than quadrupled between 1995 and 2018, from just 18% to 87%. The share of exports generated by the private sector more than doubled over the same period, from 34% to 88%. And private-sector fixed-asset investment jumped from 42% to 65% of the total. The message in the data is clear: clamping down on the private sector and threatening innovators is not the way to ensure sustained rapid growth. Chinese entrepreneurs can read the writing on the wall. They understand that their political and regulatory room to maneuver is shrinking, and that the balance has shifted in favor of state-owned firms and public officials. And they understand that this uneasy atmosphere is likely to persist."
Oct 16th 2021
EXTRACT: "We designed a programme that incorporated data from over 300 million buildings and analysed 130 million km² of land – almost the entire land surface area of the planet. This estimated how much energy could be produced from the 0.2 million km² of rooftops present on that land, an area roughly the same size as the UK."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "Britain in the 1950s was wedded to the US, acting as a partner rather than leading the charge. Now, while the UK continues to support the US, the influence it has seems negligible. While it may bring comfort to the UK to feel it is a partner to a superpower, being its stooge or subordinate is an unpleasant place to be, no matter how much you tell yourself it values your opinion."
Oct 6th 2021
EXTRACT: "That was then. Now, the Chinese government has doubled down, with President Xi Jinping throwing the full force of his power into a “common prosperity” campaign aimed at addressing inequalities of income and wealth. Moreover, the regulatory net has been broadened, not just to ban cryptocurrencies, but also to become an instrument of social engineering, with the government adding e-cigarettes, business drinking, and celebrity fan culture to its ever-lengthening list of bad social habits. All this only compounds the concerns I raised two months ago. The new dual thrust of Chinese policy – redistribution plus re-regulation – strikes at the heart of the market-based “reform and opening up” that have underpinned China’s growth miracle since the days of Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s. It will subdue the entrepreneurial activity that has been so important in powering China’s dynamic private sector, with lasting consequences for the next, innovations-driven, phase of Chinese economic development. Without animal spirits, the case for indigenous innovation is in tatters."
Oct 5th 2021
EXTRACT: "Wartime nostalgia plays an important part in Britain’s instinctive fondness for the special relationship. Like former Prime Minister Tony Blair in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some British politicians might believe that the United Kingdom is the only European country with serious armed forces and the political will to use them. Prime Minister Boris Johnson, like Blair before him, seems to fancy himself a modern-day Churchill. Unfortunately (or not), Britain’s military power is insignificant compared to what Churchill could command in 1944. Wartime nostalgia has drawn Britain into several foolish American wars, which other European countries were wise to avoid."
Sep 24th 2021
EXTRACTS: "We have found that 47 million American adults – nearly 1 in 5 – agree with the statement that “the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.” Of those, 21 million also agree that “use of force is justified to restore Donald J. Trump to the presidency.” Our survey found that many of these 21 million people with insurrectionist sentiments have the capacity for violent mobilization. At least 7 million of them already own a gun, and at least 3 million have served in the U.S. military and so have lethal skills. Of those 21 million, 6 million said they supported right-wing militias and extremist groups, and 1 million said they are themselves or personally know a member of such a group, including the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys." ----- "..... the Jan. 6 insurrection represents a far more mainstream movement than earlier instances of right-wing extremism across the country. Those events, mostly limited to white supremacist and militia groups, saw more than 100 individuals arrested from 2015 to 2020. But just 14% of those arrested for their actions on Jan. 6 are members of those groups. More than half are business owners or middle-aged white-collar professionals, and only 7% are unemployed."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACT: "That long path, though, has from the start had within it one fundamental flaw. If we are to make sense of wider global trends in insecurity, we have to recognise that in all the analysis around the 9/11 anniversary there lies the belief that the main security concern must be with an extreme version of Islam. It may seem a reasonable mistake, given the impact of the wars, but it still misses the point. The war on terror is better seen as one part of a global trend which goes well beyond a single religious tradition – a slow but steady move towards revolts from the margins."
Sep 11th 2021
EXTRACTS: "Is it not extraordinary that in a country that claims to be as enlightened and advanced as ours, the combined wealth of three individuals – Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and investor Warren Buffett – exceeds the total wealth of the bottom half of Americans? One has to return to the days of the pharaohs of Egypt to find a parallel to the extreme wealth inequality that we see in in America today." ...... "The top tax rate remained above 90 percent through the 1950s and did not dip below 70 percent until 1981. At no point during the decades that saw America’s greatest economic growth did the tax on the wealthy drop below 70 percent. Today it is somewhere around 37 percent. President Biden’s American Families Plan would increase the top tax rate to 39.6 percent – a fairly modest alteration, albeit in the right direction. It is true that there was a time when the top marginal tax was even lower than it is today: in the years leading up to the Great Depression it hovered around 25 percent."
Sep 7th 2021
EXTRACT: "But Biden can’t be blamed for the rise of the Taliban, or the fragile state of a country that has seen far too many wars and invasions. The US should not have been there in the first place, but that is a lesson that great powers never seem to learn."
Sep 4th 2021
EXTRACT: "The world is only starting to grapple with how profound the artificial-intelligence revolution will be. AI technologies will create waves of progress in critical infrastructure, commerce, transportation, health, education, financial markets, food production, and environmental sustainability. Successful adoption of AI will drive economies, reshape societies, and determine which countries set the rules for the coming century." ----- "AI will reorganize the world and change the course of human history. The democratic world must lead that process."
Sep 1st 2021
EXTRACT: "Although the Fed is considering tapering its quantitative easing (QE), it will likely remain dovish and behind the curve overall. Like most central banks, it has been lured into a “debt trap” by the surge in private and public liabilities (as a share of GDP) in recent years. Even if inflation stays higher than targeted, exiting QE too soon could cause bond, credit, and stock markets to crash. That would subject the economy to a hard landing, potentially forcing the Fed to reverse itself and resume QE." ---- "After all, that is what happened between the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, following the Fed’s previous attempt to raise rates and roll back QE."