Sep 30th 2010

10-2-10 Rally Gives Progressives a Chance to Stand Up Straight

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

This Saturday, a broad coalition of progressive organizations will hold a massive One Nation Working Together rally – actually kind of a revival – aimed at allowing Progressives to emerge from a defensive crouch, stand up straight and mobilize our forces to do battle in the decisive mid-term elections.

Due to a navigational error, the U.S. 4th Infantry Division landed on the wrong inlet on Utah Beach in Normandy on D-Day in 1944. For hours they were disoriented and pinned down by German defenders.  Then the only general to accompany the amphibious assault, General Ted Roosevelt (son of President Teddy Roosevelt), personally rallied his troops from the beach, over the seawall and established a beachhead that was critical to the successful invasion of France that ultimately ended World War II.

Saturday’s rally is aimed at energizing thousands of latter-day General Ted Roosevelt’s who can fan out across America and do the same for the progressive forces that can be successful on November 2nd if – together – we stand up straight, take the offensive  and refuse to be pinned down by constant attacks from the right.

The President’s speech to 27,000 in Madison, WI last Monday night fired up all present.  It was a great start.  But this weekend’s rally-organizers plan to communicate one central message to the thousands of activists that will gather in Washington Saturday: the President and other Democratic political leaders are not the only ones responsible for rallying our forces. We are all the Generals who will rally our troops off this beach.  It’s up to us to take the leadership to prevent the Big Business, Wall Street-dominated, Tea-Party-Republicans from reclaiming right wing domination of American politics.

For forty years the right was on the offensive in America.  At least when Bill Clinton was President, Democrats had a team on the field, but in so many respects the right wing offensive continued until their crushing defeat in November 2008. 

For the last 18 months, the progressive forces have once again been on the offense.  But the entrenched corporate interests didn’t roll over and play dead.  They fought tooth and nail – they lied, they bit, they poked eyes – they did everything in their power to stop change.

Progressives won a lot in the last 18 months.  We stopped the Great Recession caused by the Republican’s policies from turning into the Great Depression.  Over the intense opposition of the insurance companies, after 60 years of trying, we passed health care reform that will finally make health care a right in America – and begins to hold those big private insurance companies accountable.  We passed landmark legislation to rein in the recklessness of the big Wall Street banks that collapsed the economy and cost eight million Americans their jobs.  We created a consumer agency headed by Elizabeth Warren – a true progressive champion for the middle class.

Along the way Congress passed the Lilly Ledbetter Act to ensure women get equal pay for equal work.  It expanded the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.  It completely reorganized the Student Loan Program to end wasteful bank subsidies and guarantee that every kid can get financing for his or her higher education.  It passed a budget that massively changed the spending priorities of the Federal government.

We did all of this in the face of constant, unrelenting fire from corporate interests.

But as any Progressive can tell you, there is so much left to do.  We can’t stop now.  We can’t let the furious, intense opposition from Wall Street, the insurance companies, big oil and the far right fringe discourage or dispirit us.  We can’t allow them to successfully take over one or both Houses of Congress.  That would bring any opportunity for serious progressive change to a screeching halt.

We have to get off the beach and get back on the offense.

Sometimes the day to day back and forth of politics can cause us to forget what’s really at stake – and the massive gulf between Progressive and Right Wing values – the difference between our vision of society and the vision of the other side.

We have to remember the fundamental difference between the right’s belief in unbridled pursuit of individual interest and our commitment to the common good; selfishness versus commitment to others; division versus unity; fear versus hope; that we’re all in this together, not “all in this alone.”

For the first few years after my wife, Jan, and I were married in 1980, her Great Aunt lived with us during the week.  Jan and I both worked, so Aunt Sylv looked after the house and was very involved in raising Jan’s two kids and my daughter.

Sylvia Lazar was a warm, wonderful woman who by that time was in her 70s.  She’d come to the United States as a teenager from the Ukraine, and still spoke with a thick accent.

Silvia had grown up in a Ukrainian schtetle –– a small peasant town where the family purchased water each day from a salesman who carried two buckets from the river on a yoke over his neck.  Oxen and horses were the principal means used to transport goods and people.  Life in her schtetle was very much as it had been for hundreds of years.

Her family moved to the United States by way of Canada in the early part of the last century to escape anti-Semitism and find a better life.

By the time she died in the mid-1980s, the world around her had been completely transformed.  In the place of oxen, she had flown on jet planes, lived in air-conditioned homes with running water and indoor plumbing.  She lived to see the development of antibiotics that changed forever the treatment of infectious disease.  She watched a television as men landed on the moon.

Worldwide, life expectancy had skyrocketed.  The standard of living in the developed world had exploded.

But Sylv had also lived through two great world wars that had killed tens of millions.  She had seen six million of her fellow European Jews systematically slaughtered in the Holocaust.  She’d seen pictures of the explosion of the atomic bomb and lived through an accelerating arms race and cold war between America and the USSR that included her old homeland.

She watched with all Americans as the world approached the edge of the nuclear precipice during the Cuban missile crisis.  And she had cheered on her niece Jan, who become active in fighting the growing environmental crisis brought on by exploding human economic activity.

Over the tiny span of one lifetime, Sylvia Lazar had been witness to the qualitative transformation of society its culture and technology.  She had seen both the breathtaking possibilities and the horrific dangers unleashed by the accelerating march of technology and human history.

Whenever I think how hard it is to make social change, I think about Aunt Sylv.

In the thick of political battle, it’s often difficult to see the qualitative change.  But all you need to do is back up a little distance from the everyday struggle to see how quickly our world has been, and is being, transformed before our eyes.

Only 155 years ago, America was ending its great Civil War.  Human slavery was abolished in America a mere eight generations ago.

That century-and-a-half represents .002% of the seven million years of human evolutionary development.  It represents only 1% of the 13,000 years since humans made the critical evolutionary advance –– agriculture.

Politics is fundamentally the means through which human societies make choices about their futures. 

Radical conservatives like to argue that the world is a dangerous place – that the tough, hard-nosed, survival-of-the-fittest, individualist values are necessary to protect our survival.  They claim that only by standing up fiercely for our own individual self-interests will we be successful at defending America and the values of “Western civilization.”  They claim that radical conservative values are tough, and that progressive values are soft.

But progressive values are the farthest thing from “pie-in-the-sky,” “soft,” “unrealistic,” “head-in-the-clouds” precepts for action.  In fact, right wing values are mainly rationales for allowing the rich to become richer and the powerful more powerful. In fact, progressive values allow us the best opportunity to survive and succeed in the future world that is simultaneously bristling with unprecedented danger, and beckoning with undreamt-of opportunity for our children and future generations – if we go there together.

Time for us all to remember that there is a lot more at stake this fall than who gets to wield the big gavel in the House of Representatives.

For everyone who was inspired and energized by the 2008 campaign, who believed that they were making history: you were right. We took a lot of ground, but the war is far from over. Now it is time to saddle up and report for duty once again.

 

Robert Creamer's recent book: Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available on  Amazon.com.

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Feb 14th 2009

Anyone who believes that anti-Semitism is a thing of the past needs to consider the case of Bishop Richard Williamson, the cleric who denies that the Holocaust occurred and insists that the murder of six million Jews is "lies, lies, lies."

Feb 14th 2009

NEW DELHI - Indians haven't often had much to root for at the Oscars, Hollywood's annual celebration of cinematic success. Only two Indian movies have been nominated in the Best Foreign Language Film category in the last 50 years, and neither won.

Feb 13th 2009

NEW YORK - A year ago, I predicted that the losses of US financial institutions would reach at least $1 trillion and possibly go as high as $2 trillion.

Feb 12th 2009

You'd think that the results of November's election -- coupled with the collapse of the economy -- would begin to make Republican lawmakers question the consequences of their blind commitment to right wing economic orthodoxy.

Feb 12th 2009

In the end, it does not matter all that much that Bibi Netanyahu is going to be Israel's next prime minister. I don't see much (if any) real differences between him and Ehud Barak or Tzipi Livni.

Feb 11th 2009

TEL AVIV- "The voters", said Binyamin Netanyahu in his strange victory speech, during Israel's bizarre post-election night, "have spoken." And so they have, in a multiplicity of self-contradictory voices.

Feb 11th 2009

War and violence always have a direct effect on elections. Wars account for dramatic shifts in voter preferences, and radical leaders and parties often poll much higher after a round of sharp violence than in normal times.

Feb 11th 2009

JERUSALEM - Israel's election is a victory for centrism and national consensus. Indeed, that is the key to understanding not only the vote count, but also Israeli public opinion, the next government, and its policies.

Feb 10th 2009

CAMBRIDGE - Two years ago, Barack Obama was a first-term senator from a mid-western state who had declared his interest in running for the presidency. Many people were skeptical that an African-American with a strange name and little national experience could win.

Feb 10th 2009

To make serious progress toward a final status agreement between Israel and the
Palestinians, George Mitchell must first work on restoring confidence in a peace
process that years of havoc and destruction have all but destroyed. To that end,

Feb 8th 2009

Peter Berkowitz's essay in the latest issue of the Weekly Standard provides good insight into what I think is the strategic irresponsibility of those in Israel's leade

Feb 6th 2009

The crisis in journalism has, during the past few months, reached meltdown proportions.

Feb 5th 2009

When I got stopped by the police in downtown Bordeaux for running a red light last week, I was thinking "Don't you cops have anything better to do ?" But the words that came out of my mouth were a lot more conciliatory, something like "Sorry, I thought it was green."

Feb 4th 2009

NEW YORK - For 15 years, I have attended the World Economic Forum in Davos. Typically, the leaders gathered there share their optimism about how globalization, technology, and markets are transforming the world for the better.

Feb 4th 2009

From his first Middle East tour as President Obama's special envoy, George
Mitchell must have found that not much has changed since his 2001 report. During
his previous mission on the origins of the Second Intifada, Mitchell concluded

Feb 3rd 2009

JERUSALEM - Europe's vocation for peacemaking and for international norms of behavior is bound to become the base upon which Barack Obama will seek to reconstruct the transatlantic alliance that his predecessor so badly damaged.

Feb 3rd 2009

Sunday's enthronement of Russia's first patriarch since the fall of the Soviet Union, Patriarch Kirill, was a moment of some reflection for those present.

Feb 2nd 2009

BERKELEY - When an economy falls into a depression, governments can try four things to return employment to its normal level and production to its "potential" level. Call them fiscal policy, credit policy, monetary policy, and inflation.