Jan 24th 2017

Donald Trump’s “Big Con”

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
 
 
 
In 1973, Robert Redford and the late Paul Newman starred in the Academy Award winning movie, “The Sting.”  It was a story about how two professional grifters conned a mob boss – an exploit they referred to as their “big – or long - con.” You might remember “The Sting” because Marvin Hamlisch revived Scott Joplin’s ragtime classic, “the Entertainer” as its theme song.
 
But the movie also offered great insight into the modus operandi of our new President, Donald Trump – and his own “big con.”
 
A con man picks out a “mark” – in Trump’s case, ordinary working people who have not seen their incomes go up in decades.  
 
Then he “plays” the mark.  He wins the “mark’s” confidence – hence the name “con man.”  He creates a plausible scenario to get the mark to willingly part with his money – and in Trump’s case – their votes and then their money.
 
The “sting” itself refers to the moment when the con is successful.  And if he has done it well, “the mark” does not realize he’s been conned until the con men are long gone.
 
Great con men operate like magicians. 
 
Magicians generally employ several distinct phases of activity to create their illusions.
 
First, the magician tells you what he is going to do – so you begin to expect to see what will actually be an illusion.
 
Second, the magician creates an elaborate preparation for the illusion – one that begins to convince your subconscious mind that it just may be plausible.
 
Finally, the magician directs your attention away from the site of the actual trick -- usually with something you can’t ignore.  The dove flies out of the hat. Or the magician uses comedy because, it turns out, recent neuroscience has found that humor suppresses attention.  Or maybe he separates the actual trick from the illusion in time, by completing the trick during the apparent preparation.
 
Then the magician – or the con man – presents you with an illusion that you believe.
 
We pay to see magicians because we want to be deceived and made to believe.   A magician convinces you that her assistant has been made to disappear – and you can’t prove it isn’t true until you see her walk out of the stage door after the performance – and you love it.
 
The con man is a different matter – with the con man, you’re furious to learn, often well after the fact, that you have been defrauded and scammed.
 
I’ll give him this: by winning the Presidency, Donald Trump showed himself to be one of the greatest con men of all time.  He conned many ordinary Americans into electing him President of the United States because they became convinced that he is on their side, when nothing could be further from the truth.
 
The good news is that, as President Obama said in his farewell address, reality has a way of catching up with you. 
 
Of course, winning the White House was not Donald Trump’s first con.  Like Henry Gondorff, Paul Newman’s character in “the Sting”, there were many and varied dotting his career.  Perhaps the most notorious was “Trump University” – a scheme so transparently fraudulent that he was forced to settle a lawsuit by paying victimized “students” $25 million before he assumed the Presidency. While he was busy trying to convince working people that he was on their side, he made his ties, his shirts, his perfume, his cuff links, his furniture and many of his other goods in low wage countries like Bangladesh, China, and Honduras.  And his hotels were using every tactic in the book to resist allowing his workers to unionize and negotiate over their wages and working conditions.
 
The ordinary working people who were conned by Trump in the big “presidential con” will not realize they were conned simply because people like me tell them they were duped.  Nobody wants to believe they were conned and telling them so will not be convincing.
 
But many of them will come to believe it on their own as they watch what he does rather than what he says in the months ahead.
 
In his dark inaugural address, Trump said that his administration would transfer power from the “elites” back to the American people.
 
But between that speech and the inaugural balls, Trump was busy signing an executive order aimed at beginning the process of taking health care away from what the Congressional Budget Office says would be 32 million ordinary Americans.
 
And he signed another order that would raise the cost of mortgage insurance by $500 per year for many first-time middle and lower income home-buyers.  Now Donald, that doesn’t sound much like standing up for ordinary Americans on the very first day of your presidency.
 
Meanwhile, Trump has appointed the most billionaire-laden cabinet in memory.  After promising to be a champion for ordinary people as an outsider, he has appointed the most insider cabinet imaginable -- what Senator Claire McCaskill referred to as a “three G Cabinet” – “Goldman (Sachs), Generals and Gazillionaires”.   And it includes many nominees who want to destroy the missions of their Departments – from environmental programs, to public education – all to benefit big corporations and the wealthy. Really?  That’s looking out for ordinary people?
 
And speaking of benefiting big corporations and the wealthy, Trump has actually proposed a gigantic tax cut for big corporations and wealthy people -- like his family.  That includes eliminating the inheritance tax that only applies to the sons and daughters of multi-millionaires like his kids.  Of course we don’t know how much they would actually benefit, since – because he won’t release his tax returns – we have no idea what he is actually worth.
 
But none of that will stop his populist rhetoric – or his fake stories about bringing jobs back to this city or that.  Like the con man that he is, he wants us to be distracted by shiny objects like the “wall” on the Mexican border, not the money he takes from the pockets of ordinary people.
 
In his inaugural address, Trump said, “The wealth of our middle class has been ripped from their homes and then redistributed across the entire world.”
 
Another con.  America’s trade policies often have not benefited the middle class.  But it isn’t because they so massively advantaged other countries.  It’s because they enhanced the power of huge corporations, CEO’s and the wealthy, relative to ordinary workers, in the U.S. and around the world.
 
In fact, America is wealthier today than it is ever been – wealthier than any other country on earth. America’s gross domestic product per person has increased 48% over the last 30 years.  That means all of us should be 48% better off than we were 30 years ago.  But ordinary people’s incomes have stagnated.  That’s not because all that money has flowed to foreign corporations.  It's because it has mainly been siphoned off by America’s billionaire class – people like Donald Trump.
 
Oxfam recently released a study showing that eight men control as much wealth as half of the world’s population combined.  Six of these are Americans. 
 
An Oxfam study also found that one percent of the world’s population now controls as much wealth as all of the other 99% combined.
 
The famous bank robber Willy Sutton said he robbed banks because, “that’s where the money is.”  When you want to know the reason that ordinary people’s incomes have stagnated, look at who got the money.
 
It wasn’t immigrants, or poor people, or people who don’t look like the belong in a Norman Rockwell painting who got all of that money.  Those Trump targets are nothing more than " shiny objects" intended to district us from what is really going on in Trump’s big con. Trump wants us to pay attention to them, while he and his billionaire pals that now run the government make off with all the loot.
 
Luckily, it isn’t taking long for people to begin to figure this out.
 
In the 45 years I have been working in progressive politics, I have never seen such a massive popular mobilization as the ones we have begun to see since the Trump election.  There were major mobilizations in the Civil Rights movement, against the wars in Viet Nam and Iraq, but never the kind of spontaneous energy that has exploded over the last several months.
 
A week and a half ago, it was a massive outpouring at rallies across the country demanding that Congress prevent Trump from taking way their health care coverage that has been made available by the Affordable Care Act.
 
This last weekend it was the astonishing mobilization of millions of women and their male supporters at the Women’s March in Washington, D. C, all around the country – and all over the world.
 
I attended the massive 250,000 person march in Chicago.  My wife, Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky joined the half million marchers in Washington.
 
Among the slogans on the thousands of homemade signs were:
 
“Never underestimate the power of extremely pissed-off women.”
 
“ I no longer accept the things I cannot change – I’m changing the things I cannot accept.”
 
“GOP: If you kill the ACA – you will all have hell to pay.”
 
“ My kitchen cabinet is more qualified than your presidential cabinet.”
 
“Fight like a girl.”
 
Respetar mi existencia o esperar mi resistencia” (Respect my existence or expect my resistance).
 
"Love not hate makes America great.”
 
“ Grab them by the emoluments – resist Trump”
 
“Nyet Trump”
 
“Yes We Can.”
 
From the Statue of Liberty: “Give me your tired, your poor – I lift my lamp before our golden door.”
 
And my favorite – was a mutation of failed GOP Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater’s famous 1964 slogan, “In Your Heart You Know He’s Right.”: 
 
“In Your Gut You Know He’s Nuts.”
 
But of course Trump isn’t nuts at all.  He’s crazy like a fox – like a great con man who has just made the sting of a lifetime.
 
There is of course one thing.  Most great con men are cool as a cucumber.  Trump’s Achilles heel is that he can’t let any slight pass.  He is a pathological narcissist.  That may be one of the reasons why Trump’s “marks” wake up to the fact that he intends to empty their pockets well before he and his billionaire friends have finished the job.

 
Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the book:  Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available on Amazon.com. He is a partner in Democracy Partners and a Senior Strategist for Americans United for Change. Follow him on Twitter @rbcreamer.

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Mar 3rd 2022
EXTRACT: "Although Ukraine’s armed forces are outnumbered by those of Russian President Vladimir Putin invading our country, we take heart from the growing support we are receiving from friends abroad. Nobody should forget that this is not just an unprovoked invasion of Ukraine; it is an assault on the free world. ---- Putin has been at war with the free world for decades. "
Mar 2nd 2022
EXTRACT: "Moreover, with China sharing the Kremlin’s interest in containing the advance of liberal democracy around the world, Putin could count on the Chinese to provide an additional economic lifeline by purchasing Russian gas. But this new relationship will not be costless. As the world continues to divide into separate technological and economic blocs, Russia will become even more dependent on China, implying a loss of strategic autonomy. Russia may have a powerful military; but with a GDP similar to that of Spain and Italy, it is far from being an economic power."
Mar 1st 2022
EXTRACT: "The financial measures just announced against Russia are unprecedented for a country of its size. This of course means it’s impossible to predict exactly how their impacts will reverberate around the Russian – and global – economy. And we still need to see the exact details of the plan. But on their face they threaten the collapse of the Russian ruble, a run on Russian banks, hyperinflation, a sharp recession and high levels of unemployment in Russia, as well as turmoil in international financial markets."
Feb 26th 2022
EXTRACT: "Putin apparently assumes that China will back him. But while he launched the invasion just weeks after concluding something akin to an alliance agreement with Xi in Beijing, Chinese officials’ reactions have been very distant with calls for “restraint.” Given Putin’s near-total reliance on China for support in challenging the US-led international order, lying to Xi would have no political or strategic advantage. That is what is so worrying: Putin no longer seems capable of the calculations that are supposed to guide a leader’s decision-making. Far from an equal partner, Russia is now on track to become a kind of Chinese vassal state."
Feb 25th 2022
EXTRACTS: "Russia’s ascent to global power in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries resulted in numerous tragedies not only for the neighbors it subjugated and gradually absorbed, but also for its own people. China’s current leaders, in particular, should be mindful of this history, considering that imperial Russia seized more territory from China than from anyone else." ----- "Putin is taking Russia hurtling back toward the nineteenth century, in search of past greatness, whereas China is forging ahead to become the defining superpower of the twenty-first century. While China has achieved unprecedentedly rapid economic and technological modernization, Putin has been pouring Russia’s energy-export revenues into the military, once again cheating the Russian people out of their future."
Feb 18th 2022
EXTRACT: "........ Xi did what was needed to lock Russia into a vassal-like dependency on China. And Putin chose to walk straight into his trap, thinking that partnership with Xi would help him in his confrontation with the West. ---- What could be better for China than a Russian economy completely cut off from the West? All the natural gas that does not flow westward to Europe could flow eastward to an energy-hungry China. All Siberia’s mineral wealth, which Russia has required Western capital and expertise to exploit, would be available only to China, as would major new infrastructure projects in Russia." ---- "Putin seems to be ignoring that China’s leaders and people view Russia as a corrupt country which stole more Chinese territory in the nineteenth century than any other."
Feb 14th 2022
EXTRACT: "Russia’s large-scale military mobilization on Ukraine’s border has grim historic precedents. But should the Kremlin pull the trigger, it will encounter a hazard that no invading army has ever faced before: 15 nuclear power reactors, which generate roughly 50% of Ukraine’s energy needs at four sites. The reactors present a daunting specter. If struck, the installations could effectively become radiological mines. And Russia itself would be a victim of the ensuing wind-borne radioactive debris. Given the vulnerability of Ukraine’s nuclear reactors and the human and environmental devastation that would follow if combat were to damage them, Russian President Vladimir Putin should think again about whether Ukraine is worth a war."
Feb 11th 2022
EXTRACT: "Yet Putin gives Xi precisely what he wants: a partner who can destabilize the Western alliance and deflect America’s strategic focus away from its China containment strategy. From Xi’s perspective, that leaves the door wide open for China’s ascendancy to great-power status, realizing the promise of national rejuvenation set forth in Xi’s cherished “China Dream.” "
Feb 10th 2022
EXTRACTS: "It has become abundantly clear that the United States has an inflation problem. What is not yet clear is how big the problem will turn out to be and how long it will last. ---- "Alarmed observers point to parallels with the 1970s, when commodity prices shot up,..." ------ "Today, in contrast, inflation expectations remain firmly anchored. The Michigan Survey of Consumers shows that respondents expect inflation to approach 5% over the coming year, before falling back to just above 2% in the subsequent four years. The inflation rate implicit in the price of five-year inflation-indexed Treasury securities shows basically the same thing: inflation averaging 2.8% over the next five years."
Jan 26th 2022
EXTRACT: "Over the past three decades, bonds have offered a negative overall yearly return only a few times. The decline of inflation rates from double-digit levels to very low single digits produced a long bull market in bonds; yields fell and returns on bonds were highly positive as their price rose. The past 30 years thus have contrasted sharply with the stagflationary 1970s, when bond yields skyrocketed alongside higher inflation, leading to massive market losses for bonds."
Jan 26th 2022
EXTRACT: "The idea of a conventional force attack by Russia on Poland, the Baltic or Black Sea states is fanciful. But it is rendered near impossible in the minds of the Kremlin leadership by the sure knowledge that Nato would take a stand. In response to events around Ukraine, the credibility of the alliance is being affirmed through a set of coordinated measures...." ---- "The forces Moscow has assembled on Ukraine’s borders are clearly intended to intimidate the government in Kyiv. But as the weeks drag on Russia may be losing the military advantage. It has already forfeited the element of surprise essential for a swift land grab (as was used during the seizure of Crimea in 2014)."
Jan 25th 2022
EXTRACT: "By now, it is passé to warn that the Fed is “behind the curve.” In fact, the Fed is so far behind that it can’t even see the curve. Its dot plots, not only for this year but also for 2023 and 2024, don’t do justice to the extent of monetary tightening that most likely will be required as the Fed scrambles to bring inflation back under control. In the meantime, financial markets are in for a very rude awakening."
Jan 25th 2022
EXTRACT: "As it is, Germany has made strides in getting off coal. Coal provided half of power production in 2000, and is now down to about a little over a quarter. And Germany has done more to put in renewables, with its “Energiewende” or Energy Switch, than any other large industrialized nation. The new Social Democratic government, which is in coalition with the Greens, plans to put enormous amounts of new renewables in every year until 2030, projecting that by that date, 80 percent of Germany’s power will come from renewables."
Jan 21st 2022
EXTRACTS: "The fear is that Moscow is backing itself into a diplomatic corner where the use of force is its only way to remain credible." ----- "The Ukrainian population has also been mobilizing in support of the troops since the seizure of Crimea and the war in Donbas. And according to a poll taken in December 2021 by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, 58% of Ukrainian men and almost 13% of women declared that they are ready to take up arms. A further 17% and 25% more said they would resist through other means. In what would be a classic case of asymmetrical warfare, resistance from Ukraine’s population could therefore prove a serious thorn in Moscow’s side."
Jan 12th 2022
EXTRACTS: "While at the time of writing, the outcome of Djokovic’s visa troubles was uncertain, the double standard of rules raises a much bigger question about the philosophy of law: can the application of a rule be so unfair that we have no valid reason to follow it?" ------ "......a rule that doesn’t treat like cases alike can’t be a law at all. This is because a key requirement of a legal system is that it needs to be stable, which means that people need to know what the law is and when it applies. If a rule doesn’t treat everyone equally, then it does the opposite and increases doubt and uncertainty about what the law even is. And if enough rules exist that create uncertainty about what the law is and when it applies, the system will collapse. A rule that undermines a legal system in this way can’t really be law at all, and legal officials shouldn’t create or uphold them."
Jan 9th 2022
EXTRACT: "Novak Djokovic, the world’s top-ranking tennis player, has just been granted a medical exemption to take part in the Australian Open. Djokovic, who has won the event nine times (one more victory would give him a record-breaking 21 major titles), refused to show proof of vaccination, which is required to enter Australia. “I will not reveal my status whether I have been vaccinated or not,” he told Blic, a Serbian daily, calling it “a private matter and an inappropriate inquiry.” The family of Dale Weeks, who died last month at the age of 78, would disagree. Weeks was a patient at a small hospital in rural Iowa, being treated for sepsis. The hospital sought to transfer him to a larger hospital where he could have surgery, but a surge in COVID-19 patients, almost all of them unvaccinated, meant that there were no spare beds. It took 15 days for Weeks to obtain a transfer, and by then, it was too late."
Jan 9th 2022
EXTRACT: "The protests that erupted across Kazakhstan on January 2 quickly turned into riots in all of the country’s major cities. What do the protesters want, and what will be the outcome of the country’s most severe civil unrest since independence in 1991? "
Jan 7th 2022
EXTRACT: ".....one wonders how Chinese President Xi Jinping views Russia’s intervention in Kazakhstan, which shares a nearly 1,800-kilometer (1,120-mile) border with China, especially in light of Putin’s earlier comments diminishing the history of Kazakhstan’s independent statehood. (He has shown similar contempt for the independence of Belarus, the Baltic states, and Ukraine.)"
Jan 7th 2022
EXTRACT: "The problem with history as propaganda is not that it makes people feel good or bad, but that it creates perpetual enemies – and thus the perpetual risk of wars."
Jan 5th 2022
EXTRACT: ".....a scenario in which Trump (or one of his allies) is designated president by the House of Representatives after the 2024 election probably belongs in the realm of political-thriller fiction.  Now consider the unlikely event that Trump were nominated and won a clear Electoral College or popular-vote majority in 2024. Rather than establish the white-nationalist dictatorship of progressive nightmares, an elderly second-term Trump would most likely be an even more ineffectual figurehead in a party dominated by conventional Republicans than he was in his first four years. If Italian democracy could survive three terms of Silvio Berlusconi as prime minister, American democracy can survive two terms of Trump. None of this is to suggest that American democracy is not under threat. Populist demagogues like Trump are symptoms of a disease in the body politic. The real threat to American democracy is the disconnect between what the bipartisan US political establishment promises and what it delivers. This problem predates Trump by decades and helps to explain his rise. "