May 14th 2018

Two Hares and a Tortoise

by David Galenson

David W. Galenson is Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago; Academic Director of the Center for Creativity Economics at Universidad del CEMA, Buenos Aires; and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. His publications include Old Masters and Young Geniuses: The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity (Princeton University Press, 2006) and Conceptual Revolutions in Twentieth-Century Art (Cambridge University Press and NBER, 2009).

During the first century of modern art, Paris was a magnet for ambitious artists from all over Europe. Remarkably, the current exhibition at Paris’ Petit Palais tells us that “Between 1789 and 1914, over a thousand Dutch artists traveled to France.” Prominent among these were Ary Scheffer, Johan Jongkind, Jacob Maris, Kees van Dongen. But of course most prominent were Vincent van Gogh and Piet Mondrian.

It was not until 1886, when he traveled from Antwerp to Paris, that the 33-year-old van Gogh discovered modern art: thus he reported from Paris that “In Antwerp I did not even know what the Impressionists were.” But once in Paris, he quickly absorbed the brighter palette and freer touch of Impressionism, as well as the color theories and pointillism of Neo-Impressionism, and peinture a l’essence, a technique he learned from Toulouse-Lautrec. Van Gogh didn’t simply experiment with these new techniques, he mastered them, and within barely two years in Paris he used them to produce successful paintings.

DG Piet Mondrian
Piet Mondrian, Flowering Apple Tree (1912). Image courtesy of the Gementeemuseum, The Hague, Netherlands.

 

Mondrian moved to Paris in 1912, at the age of 40, and living there allowed him to study the foundations of Cubism. He was inspired but not satisfied, for he believed that Picasso and Braque had not fully developed their research. He began by applying a form of Cubism to the landscapes he had painted in Holland, but slowly and gradually his style evolved beyond this, and unlike the Cubists he came to eliminate all traces of visible reality from his art. Mondrian prized his independence: he admired Picasso, but refused ever to meet him, fearing he would be dominated by the Spaniard’s strong personality. He studied all of Paris’ modern movements, and late in his life he wrote that “I admired them. But nonetheless I had to find the path myself.” He would develop his art gradually and independently for three decades, and it never ceased to evolve until his death in 1944.

DG_van Gohg
Vincent van Gogh, Boulevard de Clichy (1887). Image courtesy of the Google Art Project.

 

The contrast in the speed with which van Gogh and Mondrian reacted to Paris’ advanced art stems from their radically differing approaches. Van Gogh was a conceptual innovator, who had always privileged conception over execution: in effect, he already knew what he wanted to express, so he could rapidly determine which parts of the modern vocabulary would allow him to do this most effectively. In contrast, Mondrian was an experimental innovator, who was uncertain of his goals as well as his technique, so he could only progress slowly and tentatively, as he discovered his artistic aims visually, in the act of working.

Across the street, the Grand Palais celebrates the impact of Paris on another artistic hare. Frantisek Kupka arrived in Paris in 1896, at the age of 25, after studying art in Prague and Vienna. He was interested in symbolist concepts, but his art was very conservative in form. In Paris, he discovered the colors of modern art, and in rapid succession experimented with the novel forms of Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. Very quickly he began to create a new and distinctive art of his own, blending his love of color with a pure geometry that broke with representation altogether. By 1912, he had plunged into a radical abstraction that synthesized elements drawn from all the advanced artistic movements of the time. He imagined his colorful geometric forms floating in an outer space of his own creation. Kupka had friends in all of Paris’ groups, and he exhibited with the Cubists and Futurists, but he was not a member of any movement. He was a classic example of a conceptual innovator, who quickly and decisively combined previously unrelated elements to make a beautiful new art that was distinctively his own.

DG_Kupga
Frantisek Kupka, The Cathedral (1912). Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

 

Van Gogh and Mondrian were giants: one inspired generations of 20th-century Expressionists, the other was followed by generations of artistic rationalists, in architecture as much as in painting. Kupka’s impact was much less, but the comparison is a stringent one, for few can have as great an influence as van Gogh and Mondrian. We are fortunate in being able to see the careers of all three, and to marvel at the enormous effect that Paris had on advanced art, and Western culture, for the first century of modern art.

Link 1: http://www.petitpalais.paris.fr/en/expositions/dutch-artists-paris-1789-1914

Link 2: https://www.grandpalais.fr/en/event/kupka

 

 

 

Browse articles by author

More Essays

Jul 5th 2016


"Wiesel’s greatness was to have remained, under all circumstances, one of those humble Jews whom he considered the crown of humanity."

Jul 1st 2016

During the 1960s, three great artists used nature as their canvas: Yves Klein painted the sky, Robert Smithson sculpted the earth, and Nicolas Garcia Uriburu painted the water.

Jul 1st 2016

That any voter would support Donald Trump to become leader of the free world seems beyond comprehension to many, a phenomenon outside the realm of understanding. That voters in the U.K.

Jun 29th 2016

BERKELEY – Several years ago, it occurred to me that social scientists today are all standing on the shoulders of giants like Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, Adam Smith, Alexis de Tocqueville, Max Weber, and Émile Durkheim.

Jun 24th 2016

Around the world, people are living longer than ever before, with a recent report from Public Health England revealing tha

Jun 20th 2016

 

We woke up last Sunday morning to news of the senseless slaughter of 49 innocents at a nightclub in Orlando, Florida. Because many of the victims were gay, it appeared that this had been a hate crime.

Jun 18th 2016

We have been hearing predictions for decades of a takeover of the world by artificial intelligence. In 1957, Herbert A. Simon predicted that within 10 years a digital computer would be the world’s chess champion.  That didn’t happen until 1996.

Jun 16th 2016

"Despite all the talk about Republican unity, only 11 of the party’s 54 senators have endorsed Trump. In the House, just 27 of 246 Republicans have done so."
Jun 13th 2016

 

Jun 7th 2016

“I mean, all us lot, we fucking caned the fucking art world. Absolutely totally phenomenal. We caned the art world as fucking kids.” Thus spoke Damien Hirst in 1999, in one of a series of interviews that were to be published as a book.

Jun 6th 2016

While Americans never have, and probably never will, agree on most things, the Constitution is the one statement on which we all agree. It sets forth what “We the People” believe, and what it actually means to be an American.

Jun 6th 2016

You hear a lot of commentary about how American Presidents are consistently prone to stretch the bounds of their constitutional power.

Jun 6th 2016

"....everything in moderation, especially ultra-processed foods."