Sep 21st 2011

Obama Isn't Trying to Start 'Class Warfare' -- He Wants to End the Republican War on the Middle Class

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

History will record that on September 19, 2011, the Republicans made a huge political miscalculation -- a miscalculation that could potentially doom their chances for victory next year.

If I were a Republican, the last thing I'd want to talk about is "class warfare."

For 30 years -- whenever they have been in power -- Republicans and their Wall Street/CEO allies have conducted a sustained, effective war on the American middle class.

Much of the success of their war has resulted from their insistence that it didn't exist. They have talked instead about how the economy needs to reward all those "job creators" whose beneficence will rain down economic prosperity on the rest of us.

They fund right-wing organizations that divert our attention by whipping up worry that gay marriage will somehow undermine heterosexual relationships. They start wars that help pad the bottom lines of defense contractors but do nothing to make us safer.

And all the while they quietly rig the economic game so that all of the growth in the Gross Domestic Product goes into the hands of the top two percent of the population -- while they cut our pay, destroy our unions and do their level best to cut our Social Security and Medicare.

There has been a "class war" all right -- a war on the middle class. And the middle class has been on the losing end.

Today the truly rich control a higher percent of our wealth and income than at any other time in generations. Income inequality is higher than at any time since 1928 -- right before the Great Depression.

According to the Economic Policy Institute, "the richest five percent of households obtained roughly 82 percent of all the nation's gains in wealth between 1983 and 2009. The bottom 60 percent of households actually had less wealth in 2009 than in 1983... "

Today, 400 families control more wealth than 150 million Americans -- almost half of our population.

American workers have become more and more productive -- but they haven't shared in the income generated by that increased productivity, so now they can't afford to buy the products and services they produce.

The success of the Wall Street/CEO/Republican war on the middle class rests, in part, in the old frog in boiling water story. If you put a frog in a pot of boiling water, they say, the frog will jump right out. But if you put a frog in a pot and gradually turn up the heat until it boils you end up with a cooked frog.

Republican policies have gradually shifted wealth, income and power from the middle class -- and those who aspire to be middle class -- into their own hands and for obvious reasons they haven't wanted to focus too much attention on "class warfare."

So now if the Republicans want to talk about "class warfare" -- in the words of George Bush -- "bring 'em on."

In fact, President Obama isn't proposing to start a "class war" -- he wants to end the war on the middle class.

Among other things, he has proposed that America live by the "Buffett Rule" -- by Warren Buffett's suggestion that he and his fellow billionaires should have to pay effective tax rates at least as high as their own secretary's.

Obama pointed out yesterday that requiring hedge fund managers to pay effective tax rates as high as plumbers and teachers was not "class warfare." The choice is clear: either you increase taxes on the wealthy -- or dramatically cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits. It is, as the President said, "simple math."

Whereas Republican proposals to rein in the deficit by cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits are intended to continue this war on the middle class, the President's plan -- in stark contrast -- addresses the three factors that actually caused the deficit in the first place.

From 1993 until 2000, Bill Clinton had successfully pushed back much of the Republican anti-middle class agenda. When he left office, America had a prosperous, growing economy, increasing middle class incomes, and budget surpluses as far as the eye could see.

Bush changed all that. The anti-middle class warriors were back in power, and they took the offensive. They passed massive new tax breaks for the rich, and set out to break unions.

Three Bush/Republican policies led directly to today's deficit:

• Giant tax cuts for the wealthy;
• Two unpaid-for wars that will ultimately cost trillions;
• Trickle-down economic policies that did not create one net private sector job and ultimately caused the financial collapse that led to the Great Recession.

The Obama deficit proposal reduces the deficit by directly addressing these three factors -- that actually caused the deficit -- rather than demanding that the budget be balanced by taking even more out of the pockets of ordinary Americans.

A trillion dollars -- 1.2 trillion with interest -- is cut by ending the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those who argue that you shouldn't count these reductions toward deficit reduction, because Obama already planned to end these wars, are ignoring the fact that they were a big reason why we have a deficit in the first place.

Second, Obama's proposal eliminates the Bush tax cuts for the rich -- and demands that millionaires, billionaires, oil companies, and CEO's who fly around in corporate jets, pay their fair share.

Finally, the Obama plan includes a robust jobs package to jumpstart the economy and put America back to work. The Republicans have no jobs plan at all -- none whatsoever. In fact, their plan is to simply let the Wall Street bankers and CEO's continue to siphon as much as possible from the pockets of ordinary Americans.

The combination of Obama's jobs and budget plans have set the stage for a clear, sharp battle for the soul of America. They have posed a stark contrast that is not framed as a battle over conflicting policies and programs -- but as a struggle between right and wrong.

That battle will continue throughout this fall -- and into next year's elections.

These proposals, coupled with the President's urgent, passionate advocacy, have transformed the political landscape.

The major iconic fights that will dominate American politics over the next 14 months will be the President's jobs proposal, his call on millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share, and the Democratic defense of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

Democrats and Progressives have the high political ground on every one of these defining issues -- and I don't just mean slightly higher political ground -- I mean political ground like Mount Everest.

By huge margins, Americans prefer to raise taxes on millionaires and billionaires rather than cut Social Security and Medicare. The choice is not even close -- in most polls something like 8 to 1.

And who can possibly question that the number one priority of voters everywhere in America is jobs?

The Republican policies that led to the Great Recession did more damage than anyone knew. Many Republicans actually thought they would benefit politically by the long, slow economic slog that ensued in its aftermath. After all, no sitting President had won re-election in a century when the economy was not good or materially improving -- except one.

Harry Truman won re-election in the midst of a bad economy in 1948 by running against the "Do-nothing Republican Congress."

President Obama's jobs and budget proposals have set the stage for just that kind of battle.

His proposals have simultaneously energized the progressive base and appealed to middle class swing voters -- especially seniors -- who agree entirely that the government should keep its hands off the Social Security and Medicare benefits they have earned, and turn instead to taxes on millionaires and billionaires to close the budget deficit that the Republican "class warfare" policies have created.

And it won't hurt that these proposals have prompted the Republicans to turn the spotlight on the subject of "class warfare" itself. They should be careful what they wish for.

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the book: Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available on Amazon.com. He is a partner in Democracy Partners and a Strategist for Americans United for Change. Follow him on Twitter @rbcreamer.


Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Mar 27th 2009

BBC headlines reports" Banned Dutch MP held at Heathrow -A Dutch MP who called the Koran a "fascist book" is to be sent back to the Netherlands after attempting to defy a ban on entering the UK.

Mar 25th 2009

Today (Editor's note: March 16) is the sixth anniversary of the death of Rachel Corrie. On March 16, 2003, in Rafah, in the Gaza Strip, she was run over by an armor-plated Caterpillar bulldozer, a machine sold by the U.S.

Mar 24th 2009

"And were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without government, I should not hesitate to prefer the later."

Mar 23rd 2009

WASHINGTON, DC - Iran's presidential race just got more interesting, with former Prime Minister Mir Hussein Mousavi throwing his hat in the ring and former President Mohammad Khatami withdrawing his.

Mar 21st 2009

High-handed treatment of depositors by big banks has guaranteed them a disastrous showing in any popularity poll-down below dentists and journalists. The global financial crisis has done nothing to help their score.

Mar 20th 2009

LONDON - I was in Jordan, that beautiful oasis of calm and moderation in a difficult and dangerous neighborhood, when I first heard the news about the murder of two British soldiers and a Catholic policeman by dissident republican terrorists in Northern Ireland.

Mar 19th 2009

In his State of the Union address, President Obama noted that although America invented solar energy technology, we have fallen behind countries like Germany and Japan in producing it. He is right of course.

Mar 17th 2009

WASHINGTON, DC - The decision of former Iranian president Mohammad Khatami not to seek the presidency again has revealed how muddled Iranian presidential politics now is.

Mar 16th 2009

When reports spread that insurance giant AIG would give top executives huge bonuses after a $170 billion taxpayer bailout, you could feel the anger rumbling in Middle America like boiling magma before the eruption of a volcano.

Mar 14th 2009

NEW DELHI - With the world's most developed economies reeling under the incubus of what is already being called the Great Recession, India at the beginning of the year took stock and issued a revised estimate for GDP growth in the 2008-2009 fiscal year.

Mar 13th 2009

NEW HAVEN - On April 2, the G-20 will hold a summit in London to discuss what we may hope will be an internationally coordinated plan to address the world economic crisis. But can such a plan really work?

Mar 13th 2009

"The Obama administration must remain unequivocal in its pursuit of the two-state solution" 

and

Mar 12th 2009

The laughs grate, the performances seem grotesque.

Mar 11th 2009

BEIRUT - On February 24, violent confrontations between Shia pilgrims and the Saudi religious police and security forces occurred at the entrance to the Prophet Mohamed's Mosque in Medina.

Mar 10th 2009

The film "Fitna" by Dutch parliament member Geert Wilders has created an uproar around the world because it links violence committed by Islamists to Islam.

Mar 9th 2009

BRUSSELS - There is no shortage of analyses of what went wrong in the world's capital markets over the past 18 months.

Mar 7th 2009

The way we view banks is conditioned by their key role in keeping the economic wheels turning. The unwillingness of banks to lend seems to go against the natural order, as if teachers were to stay at home on a school day.